Stay tuned for a very important announcement regarding food poisoning.
All to this poison.
The carrot, the peas, the celery sticks.
The meat and the fish will make you sick.
All to this poison.
The apples, tomatoes, the sweet and the corn.
All the food is poison.
Don't eat the food, it's poison food.
All to this poison.
The onion, pickles and the melons too.
Even the pasta and the turkey are contaminated food.
Don't eat the food
Chicken
Barley
White rice baked beans got loud rocks
Sound flower seeds
Radicchio, pumice, oranges
Host avocados
You dance barbecue brisket
What's going on, everybody?
I hope everyone's having a fantastic evening afternoon, pre-noon, no matter where you are
in the world.
and this is the Hasan Ambrus has coming to you live from sunny California, Los Angeles.
Folks were live and alive in RFK juniors universe in RFK juniors.
United States of America and Donald Trump's United States of America. We are alive.
We're alive and I hope all the boys, girls and MBS are having a fantastic one.
It's today's a beautiful day. Today's a wonderful day. I'll just say a betrayal.
No, what what happened?
Um,
that for that video is made by a friend of the show, Tim Heidecker. Yes. Uh, on adult swim.
Anyway, ladies and gentlemen, boys, girls and MBS were live, were alive.
And I hope everyone's having a fantastic one because today's a beautiful day.
today's a wonderful day that Pinoy Banner didn't work, Oliver. Wait, sister soldier remarks.
You want me to do it June 1992 sister soldier remarks react rap artist response to Clinton
remarks anyway but yes I am wearing a spear collar shirt for those of you who are wondering
Most watch kai take off in a co-worker-in-law. I saw
This is kai gate 2.0
It's so funny. She has no idea. Watch Qt Micaiah, Briceman and IU. Honestly, I'll take it.
Are you rocking QT's train cuffs? No, this is not a cuff sleeve shirt, so not yet.
Has she never heard of Let A Sleeping Dog Lie? Yeah, the problem is she's always sleeping.
If a son did this and posted this, it would be a two week news cycle.
Experts would be brought on the Fox News panels.
The label is dog abuse.
Every political candidate in the nation will be asked to condemn it as a first question in
every interview.
Yeah.
I wish that was a joke, but that's low key where we're at.
Kai should be a ring bearer.
Yes.
Kai is a ring bearer.
My best friend Nick Mullin talked about you on Stobby's podcast today.
Wait, really?
That's funny.
Anyway, um, we'll take a look at that and more.
Oh, I saw the, I saw this dude.
What the fuck is this?
Congratulations.
I'll dwell said on winning Michigan Democratic Senate primary Philippines is proud of you
and it's just a photo of me.
Did what?
Who did this?
How did this happen?
Okay.
Yes.
This is something that they do in Swagapino land.
Okay.
This is something that they do in Swagapino land.
I just don't understand like why they thought it was I, it was me running for office and
not Abdul.
I fucking love it though.
I love it.
Hold on.
I gotta post it on my fucking Instagram
because I have the original too.
They do this with everyone, it's hilarious.
I know it's very, very funny. Millie mini splits on top. So you know,
the certified Hassan Abbey approved. Yes.
This is hitting all of my interests as a HVAC business owner.
Um, what is this? Oh, the condom Hassan,
the condom Hassan rally has started JD Vance is currently stomping in
Michigan. Uh, a person who is far worse to me,
obviously we'll be watching that rally cause there's going to be some
condom Hassan Abbey moments there for sure. Uh,
the vice president by the way, but um, uh,
Hasan yesterday I need to get off Twitter man,
proceeds to three, three grillion times. Oh,
actually I deleted Twitter from my phone.
Republican Lisa McCain begins her speech on Hasan Piker in front of a
MAGA crowd.
Right. Hasan Piker, y'all heard of him.
He's trying to say, oh, he's some just podcaster. Really?
He was attached to your hip during the primary. Now he's just some podcaster, nice friend you
are, right? Be proud of who you are. I'm a proud American and I'm gonna share with you.
That's so awesome that no one, no one gets crickets, crickets. If this audience, okay,
it's official. It's official. It's not even the Republicans that hate me as much in spite
the Fox News coverage, the endless Fox News coverage is just establishment Democrats.
I'm not even kidding. I think the only group of individuals on the internet that have gotten the
Hassan Piker brain rot are Twitter power users, the handful of Democratic Party consultants that
are still on Twitter, and the handful of Democratic Party adjacent content creators that want to
become DNC consultants. That's so funny. That's it's an extremely online brain disease.
You know, that's awesome.
Yes, so it's not worth covering anymore. As you can see, I mean, I'm gonna have some
fucking fun. Great comments on the YouTube video for your interview with some of four.
Yeah. So there has been a, we'll talk about all this stuff. We'll talk about all this stuff.
We'll get into all of this and more in a second. Personal news wise, there's not really much going
on in my life other than just like incest and slander hour. I deleted tweet. I deleted Twitter
off my phone. Finally, I'm going back to, I'm going back to the basics. I'm going back to
being normal. I'm going back to mental sanity. And yeah, no, the breakfast club interview actually
banged as well. Shout out to Charlemagne who posted it. Shout out to Charlemagne who posted
it two months later, but right at the right moment. And it has been gaining tremendous
views on there too. I think it's because people are just like, I want to see more of this guy.
Like, I want to see more of what this guy is about. We keep hearing about this guy because my
YouTube views have also exploded. Obviously, it has not actually led to a lot of new viewership
here on Twitch because most people, I mean, it's impossible for most people to figure out
you
Because I get excited every Monday morning, I get excited to go live every Monday morning
to talk about the news and do some reading beforehand.
And I know that that is an experience that's not shared by many and I hope that one day
You will also be able to have some autonomy in your workplace, some real emotional fulfillment
that you gain out of your gainful employment and therefore are also looking forward to
your Mondays.
Anyway, so, in any case, personal news-wise, what's going on in my life, not really
much.
I'm a chud ass loser
I
went to
I
Went to bed early as always
JD Vance condoms on rally, Michigan. All right, we'll put that in the title but
I
Went to bed early last night. I've been watching madman
Shout out check out the spear collar by the way. That's also low key part of the whole thing
I am before I did that obviously I where I went to sleep. I did the fear and podcast
It's already readily available. You guys can go watch it if you have it. So really it's a banger episode as always
and
What was I going to say
Other than that not much is going on
I worked out this morning. Your boy's still kind of weak. It's fine.
And
Sobby talks to Nick Mullin about your suit. Okay, we have this.
If there's something that starts getting you thinking, let me put on one of those little
Chinese collars and fucking.
You know what I mean? The shit fucking Mao was up to.
Oh, like Hassan's clothes.
Yeah, it is so funny.
Now, he's like, I just have normal ideas and every eighth suit
he puts on is fucking.
He's doing chairman because he's saying I have normal ideas.
Nobody's talking.
You know, he's trying to wear a suit so that like
public and grandmas accept him and shit.
And then is he after that?
He is for sure.
He's wearing suits now.
I've never I've not seen this.
He's wearing suits like a fucking pussy.
Yeah, he dresses.
He's oh am I how he looks to me is like how Bart Simpson looks on shirts that a guy like Hassan would wear
Yeah, he's like he's gone from that to wearing suits like plastic suits and you know, that's a much better look obviously
Yeah, I'm a good looking, you know overgrown like a teenager. Yeah, but he dresses like now and everyone loses their mind
But when Hillary Clinton does it? Yeah
Oh, that's true. Yeah
It's messed up. It's messed up. It's fucked up. Yeah. Yeah. I got the Bernard response
to what a puzzling headline from ZBS. Oh yeah. We're going to talk about that as well. Let's
just blast off real quick because, uh, you know, JD Vance condoms on Valley AS apologizes.
CBS Insane 9-11 article US strike on Iran oil rises manufactured outrage continues the war wages on Canada Canada tariffs
War continues. Spear collar is sick. Now you need to get a collar clip. Yeah, I know.
Imagine a world where that's the worst of it. Like people are ops and they you didn't have
the shit storm for me. Those people are not my ops. Those are friends of mine who might as well
be my motherfucking ops. And yeah, there's a lot going on today. Obviously, we'll be talking
about it all. And you know, shout out to the Swagapinos for today's blast off meme, of course,
Pinoy Gang. Shout out to the Swagapinos. Shout out to Pinoy Gang. I love you guys. You are the best.
I love that Pinoy Gang is supporting Senator, hopefully the next Senator from Michigan,
Abdul al-sayed
Damn Kai about to break the debt damn bed all them treats treats
Oh, she she left she's like no I'm good
Good afternoon nephew. Yeah
They gave you the skin of a k-pop star. I mean it's fine
Um, I'm trying to get more tan out here, but they're making me, what is this?
You should post on blue sky.
They're attacking their people are defending you from the race attacks.
You're getting from the capital hunters account.
I think you would do numbers on there and there is no Nazis on there.
Oh yeah.
That's the other thing.
Okay.
That was the last, that's why I deleted Twitter from my phone, by the way,
because I was like, why am I fucking responding to this?
Why am I seeing?
Why am I seeing this unbelievably dumb tweet on my for you page like this is not good for my brain
This is not good for my mind. So this is not good or healthy for anything really because it's for you dog
It's lit is quite literally what is going on. What's taking place on Twitter? Okay?
It was it's it's so ridiculous like look at this guy
Let's consider Hassan's motivations. One, if he wanted Dems to win, he'd lay low till
after the midterms. He's a liability now too. If he wanted power for himself, he'd lay low,
let Elzad win, then call in favors for helping him win the primaries. So why can't Hassan
shut up? What else is, uh, he says, why can't Hassan shut up? What else Hassan could be
motivated by money and needing the views of nurses who needs to hear himself talk
at dedicated record like his uncle, Jake, we were too dumb to understand general
election politics. If people are going to talk about them, let's ask which. I said,
you're right. I'm shuttering my operations because APAC Dems and the GOP are falsely
leaving me anti-Semite. We are done from here on out. No more organizing. I'm going on a 65-day
vacation. No more news coverage. No more tweets. What do these guys think I do?
Like, do these guys, like, does this guy capital hunters account? Does he think that,
like I don't have a job. Like what I'm doing is just like I'm a surrogate. I just popped up out
of nowhere and I'm a surrogate for campaigns. Is that what this fucking idiot thinks?
Like he literally said, hey man, people are slandering you too much. You should just stop
covering the news. You should just go radio silent. And it's like, that's not how anything works.
Do you think I just materialized the one day in front of you? Is this how it works?
Do you think I'm choosing for Fox News to turn me into their number one op?
Wear a suit with writing so when they complain you can get your message out. Sure.
Capital Hunters is legitimately not bright. I smacked him down in two posts and he gave up.
Yeah, he goes to some we're saying that America's want democracy and your juvenile grandstanding
is fucking it up for us.
Why don't you take a little vacation in Turkey where you grew up and advocate for the genocide
victims there like the Armenians and the Kurds go help them out for a while.
And there it is.
It always goes back to some racist as nonsense.
I didn't even see this response until, uh, until this very moment, but it's like,
that is a not so subtle, not a being like, why do you care about Israel's genocide
too much?
single one of these guys. Every single one of these guys. You pull the fucking rugs, okay?
You scratch the surface a little bit. Underneath it, you got a guy who is very upset about
Israel. Very upset about my coverage on Israel. Very upset about the attitude shift that
is taking place on Israel. It's always the same. You pull the mask off and underneath
that there's a guy who's going, maybe you should just stop doing your job, actually.
You should just shut the fuck up.
Have you thought about shutting the fuck up?
Yeah, because you're just, you're harming our chances.
You're harming our chances of winning elections.
That's why I'm upset, not because I absolutely despise the fact that Israel has fallen
out of favor because it did a genocide and I am foolishly blaming you for it.
It's so funny.
Also, yeah, he does the, you know, go back to where you came from. That was another one.
Or take 65 day vacations and read this book about truly heroic, brave and tough activists
who fought and suffered and died from civil rights and conditions you've never experienced.
No flabby winding on live streams from them instead of rootless strategizing until they
won the prize. Or you could go back to your uncle show and help him promote Marjorie
Taylor Greene and Tucker Russell for a while. I just don't understand like none
One of this stuff is relevant to what, you know, what I'm doing, my uncle's show is utterly
irrelevant to what I'm doing.
It's not just the white people calling you a terrorist, there's a literal Samoan guy
I know that continues to repeat all the white supremacist talker boys and Islamophobia
and follows nothing but white supremacist streamers, conservatives are cooked.
Yeah.
No, no, I know.
But it's so funny that these guys are, they, I don't understand how these guys literally
do not recognize that they are in the minority.
Like they're in the unbelievably tiny minority, not even just, not even just on the Democratic
Party side where they are definitely in the minority, but just like in general, right?
Like people who are looking at the current predicament and saying, yeah, you know,
You know what this country needs more aid to Israel?
There's like 12 people that remain in the country that feel this way.
And all 12 of them are constantly on television, okay?
It's crazy.
Like, there's, like, obviously I'm exaggerating when I say 12, let's say 12,000, okay?
They're all in Congress, they're all in the media, and that's it.
And also on Twitter, it's so crazy to me that they are just like, this is the
the most significant, most consequential position.
And yet they still have the audacity to try to claim
that their resentment actually comes
from democratic electoral performance.
Doug, you want the candidates to take
on the least popular position of all time.
You do not care about electoral performance.
You've never cared about electoral performance.
It's very clear what you actually care about
and you deep down inside recognize
that that position is so unbelievably unpopular that you can't even outright say it anymore.
That's why if you search for many of these accounts that have spent like the last six months now,
since third way started attacking me, constantly going,
chirping about, uh, chirping about Abdul, chirping about me, chirping about Israel.
If you, if you actually go back to like, you know, post 2023 during 2024,
during 2025, like what their perspective was on Israel, you very quickly,
Unfortunately, you very, very quickly recognize exactly what's going on.
Huh.
Dr. Amber explains their hate for you.
So unfortunately, we are doomed to continue to have discourse cycles about Hassan Piker
because none of these conversations are actually about Hassan Piker himself.
Because in all of these conversations, Hassan Piker is a proxy, an avatar for an insurgent
left-wing movement in this country that seeks to challenge-
Yeah, I before I continue with that by the way, sorry. I'm I'm silencing black women. I apologize for doing that
but
the the the expectation that I just like
Lay down and eat it is so funny
Because that's just not how anything works, right?
Like obviously I'm not gonna shutter my operation because people are fucking slandering me
but it's
It's it's it's very it's additionally funny because like they just I guess fundamentally don't understand what I'm doing
Or they do understand what I'm doing and they think like this is a slick way to
This is a slick way to potentially get the goal across because like
APAC would love nothing more than for me to shut up
You know what I mean establish your Democrats would love nothing more than for me to stop
Stop streaming, stop live streaming, stop trying to organize people around these issues.
Stop trying to get people that are more responsive to the demands of the majority elected in the
office.
They would love that.
So it's very funny when these guys are like, oh, I don't really like APEC, but you should
really shut up and you should also go away.
Like, what are you doing?
What have you done?
What are you up to?
How about you organize and fight back against the misinformation?
How about you go?
Abdul to win, then attack the Republicans that are constantly trying to foment instability,
constantly trying to divide the base of the Democratic Party. This is not about me at all.
This is about the left, broadly speaking, and I'm glad that there are other people who understand
exactly what's happening, right? Adam Johnson is obviously one of them. He's always been one
of these guys who's very, you know, very good with his media analysis. He says,
very silly that nominal liberals and nominal liberal networks keep indulging in Pipergate,
as if it's a good faith concern dividing Dems, rather than the world's most obvious Zionist
discipline and campaign designed to drive up El Said's negatives until he duly capitulates on
Israel. We're just gonna do thinly veiled variations of the Corbyn Playbook every six
months until the end of time without anyone in our media pointing out the obvious thing
that's obviously going on, namely in this instance he's being piled on for something he
very clearly didn't say. Just nonstop smoke and no fire. All smoke all the time being
fanned by the most shameless cynics on earth and everyone is compelled to comment on the
smoke without they or the dopey script reading anchors ever establishing the existence and
validity of any fire. Yeah. Like the Republicans have already moved on from it. We'll not move
down necessarily, but like the Republicans already are like, yeah, we have decided this
guy is a dangerous anti-Semite who has no place in American politics, right? But the
Democrats, the Democratic voters in particular, don't see it that way. Most of them don't
know who I am. And the ones that do obviously like me. And the ones that do also understand
why these attacks are coming. These attacks are coming in my direction. It's because of
our shared values on this issue, on the issue of genocide, right? So it's not working. But the
establishment Democrats and establishment media that are obviously working alongside
establishment Democrats to continue this ridiculous smear operation, they just
Reviews to recognize that there's no appetite from the base for this shit. And if anything it's on a it's unironically
boosting my profile on a 90-10 issue
That's part of the reason why I think like there is a lot more
Like the the the algorithm has started favoring the YouTube videos the same with like the breakfast club interview
Like it's not working
It's not working at all because most people are sick and tired of not only Israel's actions and its violence and its endless demand for
American munitions endless demand for American tax dollars
But also they're sick and tired of people who are pro-Israel constantly fucking chirping about those who are not
Then I saw this guy's like a Bugatti text the tech bro besides mom daddy and I saw you they're great
I love them. But John Ossoff, Cory Booker, all this motherfuckers coming after Hasan Piker.
Like this is the, this is not the profile of a guy who I ever expected to defend me. Okay.
Dude sitting in his Bugatti dude who loves like, you know, tech stuff coming out. He's got chrome
hearts on and he's like, yo, I'm sick and tired of these goddamn establishment Democrats
coming after this Hasan guy. On Piker is the most influential Democratic boys yet.
You may not like him because he's Marxist you may not like him because he's too far left
However, he is literally the left Joe Rogan and you are not using his platform to try to win for the fucking party
Because daddy a pack has come to you and said hey, let's all come den him at once James. Hello Rico is streaming to third
Yo Jason the ween is out. Jason the ween is out. We got new nephew
Eric ooh
Jason the ween you're done
You're done. New nephew unlocked. Old nephew is out. New nephew is in.
Eric U is a woke youngster. He's been dope. Hell yeah.
Teen people for an hour. If I go to the town square with the bucket busking for change,
I will have a bigger audience than 13 fucking viewers.
Maybe I thought too much of John Ossoff. Maybe I'm wrong. Alright, maybe the man
who goes out to Trump super fucking hard, the man who was rising up and pulling rankings
and odds of becoming the president, John Ossoff.
Maybe I thought way too much of them
because at the end of the day, he is a fucking bootlicker
and no Democrat can acknowledge the fact
that Hassan Piker is a great voice.
And yes, many people hate him,
however many people love him as well.
He is truly the most influential political voice
all right now for the younger people
and you are not using him?
Why?
Why are we not using Hassan Piker?
Not using Hassan Piker during the primaries
and two years before a major general election
Is like not using Marshawn Lynch on the fucking one yard line in the Super Bowl. It's stupid and idiotic you have a weapon
Dude
On the beer post you put up there here's some Iowa soldier commandos making the same exact comparison. What is this?
These generals offer Israel now they see Jewish terrorism as the threat
Rashida's calling out the hypocrisy
Yeah, to all who have attacked Sampire, I'm going to check back to see if you said anything
about lower-loom or calling a black woman running percent in Florida, represent a Angie
Nixon, a ghetto bitch, and said that she should tug on her leash.
I stand with Angie Nixon, yeah.
You should know that YouTube views are up for everyone, 50 to 80 percent due to some
technical changes.
No, it's not 50 to 80 percent up.
up 10% chatter. It's 8 to 10%. The algorithm change made it so that YouTube now gets 8 to
10% more viewership. 80% is insane. Chatter is right. No, it's not 80%.
400% actually. Anyway, I know they change how they count viewership. I know.
Chatters 100% right, a double for most channels. I work in marketing their way up. Well, in any case,
we happen to also take control over the Hassan ibn Qlips industrial complex at the same time frame.
And we have seen decent success in that process alongside the YouTube viewership going up
Okay
They went to the bank and 10x that shit
Yeah
So let's get back to the to the original tiktok that I was watching
Let's get back to the original TikTok that I was watching titled,
Hassan Piker Discourse Isn't About Hassan Piker.
The US's relationship with Israel and American Empire more broadly that seeks to challenge wealth
inequality and really ask questions about how our money is being spent. It seeks really to
disrupt the status quo in terms of how we have done electoral politics in this country.
And Hassan is the easiest target through which to level all of that criticism because he
one says stupid shit sometimes and then two the things that he says that aren't stupid or that
aren't problematic it's easy to clip them to make it seem as such and so you just you just then make
him the scapegoat for all of those um critiques you have of the insurgent left and so then you
don't have to critique the actual politicians you can just level it all at him. There is also
an important subtext to this which is that the people who make these criticisms of of
Hassan are relying on you to make the association that says Hassan that sounds
like Hussein. Saddam Hussein. Osama bin Laden, 9-11 terrorists, you hit Muslims. That like that is,
that is. It's not even subtle, bro. It's not even remotely subtle. Okay. It is the least subtle
exercise of all fucking time. Okay. I mean, they did it today. They did it today. They did it again.
CBS released an article, right? With the headline or with the subtitle for Michigan Democrat,
Abdul Al Sayed, September 11th, Commemoration Invites Scrutiny. CBS News reports, as the nation
prepares to mark 25 years since September 11, 2001, Abdul Al Sayed, the Democratic nominee for
US Senate in Michigan, may be facing the risk of renewed scrutiny and fresh political attack.
Like, there is a way to title this.
The way to title it is, Abdullal Sayed, American under unjustifiable attacks, you know, under
Islamophobic attacks, right?
The reason why they're covering the article, the reason why they're highlighting the article
this way is to associate another Muslim man with 9-11, okay?
9-11, the thing that every Muslim is responsible for, including but not limited to Zoran Kwame
Mamdani, Abdul El Sayed, Hassan Piker, who did 9-11, right?
And it's not even remotely subtle yet. This week on 60 Minutes, scary Michigan Islam,
9-11, terrorism, Muslim al-Qaeda, frightening election, 9-11 election, election on 9-11
the Michigan election about doing 9-11, legalizing 9-11, that's literally what they're doing.
Is not slick. It ain't fucking slick.
At this point, it is becoming increasingly clear to me that the only time 9-11 is actually
seriously discussed in the media is to shit on a Muslim American or to shit on all Muslims
or to shit on the entirety of Islam.
No one actually talks about the Zidroga bill, no one talks about the first responders, no
one talks about the global war on terror that came after, the surveillance state that
we created that Americans are increasingly more frustrated with is just about how can
When we use 9-11 cynically against the entirety of the religion of Islam, against all Muslim
Americans is so fucked up.
It's crazy, it's crazy.
And I guess that kind of is going along with the tradition of how the American government
Responded to 9-11 because that is what the American government ultimately did, right?
Don't worry blue collar workers are finally opening
Yeah, remember remember who you're fighting for remember who you're working for it's for
parasitic capital, it's for Israel, it's for weapons contractors, it's for the
defense industry's executives, it's for the politicians who are doing inside
trading. Isn't that nice? Isn't that cool? We all get the work day in, day out,
nine to five tirelessly sucking the man's dick all day every day, just so
some fucking executive can generate better returns on their initial investment.
What is this? You got radio host defending you now? Law of Radio DJ at my university defending you
to his boomer liberal audience and explain how it's about Israel Palestine and Islamophobia.
He even played the whole clip in context. People are going after you for hell yeah.
That is a lot of what this is it is trying to make it scary brown Muslim man
terrorist scary dangerous not American it is very much if you can't beat them
call them a terrorist type shit I think then through that lens it's very easy to
understand this question of like well why are they beefing with a live streamer
it's like well because it's not actually about the live streamer it's
about what he represents as a part of the insurgent left-leaning movement
Particularly for black and brown people who they don't see as part of the fabric of what it means to be an American
Yep
I'm glad they're on it
But of course no matter what there will always be this there are better examples in a song
Yes, yes, and no, okay. Are there much better communicators than myself out there? Of course there are are there much
More intelligent people out there. Of course there are okay
but you're kind of stuck with me. That's number one. Number two. Number two. No matter how thoughtful
someone is, no matter how careful someone is, no matter how brilliant someone is, because I would
say Zoran fits that archetype, that stereotype, that perfect communicator that is very good at
Speaking the language of liberalism
And yet he is still attacked mercilessly as well
Okay, that's it and there's also limitations to what you can say and what you can do
There's a different role that different groups play
Okay, Zoramumdani is the mayor. He's got mayor interests. He's he needs to be a good mayor. That's his number one
responsibility. All right, let's just listen to JD Vance first.
I'm going to make a fantastic judge on the Michigan Supreme Court, Michael. I got to give
a great shout out to Lisa McClane, who's one of the great warriors that we have in
Congress. We love you, Lisa.
I don't even know if I want to watch this. Honestly, he's so wack. There's 69 people
watching this.
Without Lisa, we would not have no taxes on tips. We would not have no tax on overtime.
would not have taxes yeah he's got zero risk dude I can't I can't do it
he been hitting the ozampic heart he looks like shit regardless
yeah he is so riskless I can't I can't even I can't do this um I'm not gonna do this all right
I'm not going to do this to you. The point I was making is this. The point I was making is this.
One. You got to work with what you got. Okay. I'm sure that, I mean, I know, not I'm sure. I know
that there are far better communicators than me out there. There are far more brilliant people,
far more thoughtful, far more kind, far more empathetic people out there, right?
Zoramumdani is one of those people. But the problem is, once the media puts the beat on you,
once you're in the crosshairs, it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter. They will rip apart
every single person as they are doing to me, as they've done in the past to Bernie Sanders,
as they've done in the past to AOC, as they've attempted to do to Zoramumdani as well.
well. And you have to understand like, I mean, this is happening side by side with Mark Rovellow.
They're doing it to Mark Rovellow. Mark Rovellow is the most inoffensive guy out there, simply
for his opposition to genocide and its defenders. They did this to Jeremy Corbyn in the UK
as well. This is what we like to call Corbynization. They're doing this to Miss Rachel, okay?
And they will continue doing this, especially if you are asleep at the wheel, especially
if you don't understand what the purpose of this smear campaign is, what the purpose
of this disciplining operation is.
So you are under no obligation to try and become more appealing to those who are in
opposition to you, to those who despise you, to those who hate you, everything you
stand for to those want to destroy this country. Okay? Republicans want to destroy this country
and are destroying this country. They are currently destroying this country. They're ripping the
social fabric apart piece by piece. They're basically stealing everything at the tippy top.
And anyone and everyone who's in opposition to that gets destroyed. They get yelled at.
and establishment Democrats lean into that as well.
So the question is, which side are you on? Do you want to oppose the Republicans?
Or do you want to maintain a petty agenda? Do you want to oppose the Republicans or are you so
easily duped and so easily manipulated by mainstream narratives that you go, you know what,
this guy is too toxic. There will never be a figure that is perfect, okay?
Okay? You are not perfect. I am not perfect. No one is perfect, and there will never be
the perfect communicator. That person does not exist, okay? Because no matter how great
someone is, no matter how kind someone is, no matter how they carry themselves, and
again, I keep going back to Zoran because I would say that we're on the opposite ends
of the spectrum as far as like, we're very aligned when it comes to, you know, our visions,
but we're on the opposite ends of the spectrum in terms of how we carry ourselves. And also
I obviously have a lot more allowance on what I can and can't say.
Meanwhile, look at the way the media is covering it. New pain for some 9-11 families as New
York's mayor finds himself in commemoration controversy. They also found one of his
9-11 tweets from like 2023 and they're yelling about that. They're yelling about that implying
that he's not like careful enough in his language around 9-11. So they can always find that they
will always find something to generate controversy around because the point is not to have a
sincere conversation. It's the exact opposite. The point is to focus on drama. That's
the point. So the question I have for you, and not just you in here, because many of
you don't even care. Many of you are obviously aware of what this, what this disciplining
operation looks like. But when you're communicating this to your friends who maybe come to you
and you're like, why are you watching this guy is fucking crazy or whatever. You should
be able to explain to them that they're being duped. That outrage can be farmed and it's
all about how you receive it. So I ask them a simple question. If they're already propoused,
I'd be like, this entire media apparatus that has spent the last three years lying
to us about what Israel was doing. Do you think they're being honest in this very
moment? It's also not like anyone is saying you should be a spokesman for every single
race. Everyone has a role to play in the capacity to reach different people. There
some races where someone like you can be helpful and somewhere it might not be helpful, for instance,
very elderly districts. Exactly. Exactly. They will always design leaders of a movement
so they can destroy them, okay? I've never said I am the leader of this movement in any way,
shape, or form, in any capacity. I've never said that, but they're propping me up to be the
spokesperson for all things left, and they're doing that so they can endlessly attack me and the left.
Some on the left think, oh, maybe we'll find someone else. Maybe we can find someone else
to be a spokesperson for the left. This guy is, he's a, he's a bad apple. He's, he's spoiled
already. He's been attacked far too much. For them, I say good luck because whoever else
that will take on this mantle, and hopefully there are more and more spokespersons for this movement regardless, and there are plenty of them and they're growing, and I'm very excited about the prospect.
But to them I say good luck. Look at what happened to Gustavo NYC DSA. Look at what happened to Megan. The DSA co-chair, National DSA co-chair.
The media is never going to find an appropriate, perfect spokesperson that they treat seriously.
Because the goal is not to say, oh, well, you're a good spokesperson.
This guy was a bad one, and that's why we were attacking him.
Now we're going to actually appreciate your feedback.
Now we're going to actually appreciate what you're doing.
not. Every single person that has been disruptive to the status quo with their commentary, with
their advocacy, have always been consistently tarnished, consistently smeared. Whether it be
uh, whether it be Bernie Sanders, whether it be Linda Sarsour, whether it be Yinhan Omar, Rashida
Tlaib, no matter what happens, do you think it's an accident? Do you think it's an accident
that every single left adjacent and left person has routinely been ripped apart
with coordinated and sophisticated smear campaigns over and over and over again every single time
one of them reaches a level of prominence a level of popularity.
Do you think that is an accident or do you think that is by design?
That's why I always say we have to be a little bit more disciplined about this and we have
to be a little bit more aware of what's going on and I think I'll be honest I think we are
we're there I genuinely think we're there from what I have seen so far I think a lot
of even boomer liberals who see the endless coverage and go enough I don't care. I think they recognize
what's going on. I think they understand that a big part of this smear campaign is Republican backed
and is deliberately created as a distraction deliberately created as a way to divide the base
and to also tarnish the credibility and reputation of yet another outspoken critic of
Israel. A lot of people hate Israel. A lot of people hate that envoys of Israel,
defenders of Israel, will regularly yell about anti-Semitism to all of its critics.
So they're used to that already for the past three years. So I don't think liberals are
actually falling for it. I don't think liberals that are, you know, outside of our sphere of
influence are falling for it at all. If anything, we're only seeing one group of
individuals who already had this intention, already had this intent to destroy its left flank,
taking advantage of the Republican media strategy and using this to generate leverage in a factional
battle. So I think we're going to come out on the other side of this far stronger. I think
I think our movement is going to be far stronger, but only if we learn the valuable lesson to
not put up with these ridiculous smears, ridiculous smear campaigns, and ridiculous distractions,
and we focus up, and we continue fighting for what truly matters.
Okay?
of the
but it is a perfect analog
it is a perfect analog
what's taking place right now is perfect for what labor did
what labor did the Jeremy Corbyn
and I want to talk about that a little bit
Paul Holden wrote this thoughtful post on it
Because I said this is what 90% of self-identifying liberals on this platform's politics are pure resentment against the left and a singular political pundit
They spend most of their days making it seem like they have any political opposite opinions beyond opposing a twitch streamer
This guy's genuinely insane. He's another one of those like election Twitter autists. I think
who is
Truly unwell there was another one. He's he is now in the halls of the other
you know
The one with the Kamala Harris post on his header
I many of these guys are like destiny orbiters sex best any orbiters and they are so fucking unhinged
They're so unbelievably on hinges like I think the average person sees the way that they post and go okay, dude. You're
Maybe you're a little rich for my blood, you know
Yeah, 784 articles to close out the month of August 784 articles
That's on no offense to 22 year olds, but he's 22. Yeah, I know I that makes a lot more sense when you realize like
half the people that you're arguing with on the internet are just like little kids
but
Paul Holden
Right. There are so many parallels between what's happening with the Dems and Piker in
the US and what happened with labor under Corbin. Like so much of the Demostation, the
labor right and the labor together project were far more animated by their total hatred
and intolerance of the left. It was visceral. They, literally, and with premeditation, worked
to undermine the labor party under Corbin so that the labor party would lose to
the Tories. Their internal strategy documents listed a labor government as a threat
to their political project. So they set about working with the press to undermine
Corbyn's Labor Morgan McSweeney, Steve Reed, and fellow traveler Imran Ahmed, now at CCDH,
worked covertly in coordination with the media and Jewish communal organizations to foment
the anti-Semism crisis often based on tendacious evidence.
They did so precisely because the 2017 election showed that the public wanted social democracy
and end to the wars in the Middle East, no, not more reheated, blairism at home and
neoconservatism abroad.
He's talking about me now.
Who says that 9-11, we're about to celebrate the 25th year,
or commemorate the 25th year of those terrible terrorist attacks
and celebrate all the brave heroes
who made it, frankly, as terrible as it was,
it could have been so much worse.
We're about to celebrate those heroes
and commemorate those that we lost.
And he campaigned, Abdul El Sayed,
one of his main campaign surrogates
suggested that America deserves 9-11.
And, you know, I was trying to understand what would motivate a person to say these things,
what would motivate a person to do these things.
And I realized that there's something about Abdul El Sayed that is very, very evil and
on the rise in the United States of America today.
He's Muslim.
And it's people who see themselves not as citizens of a combination fighting for every
single person, whether they're Jewish or Christian, whether they're white or black or brown, but
see themselves as fighting for one group at the expense of others.
And that is how, ladies and gentlemen, you destroy the United States of America.
I see in this crowd, people from all walks of life.
I see white people.
I see black people.
I see Jews and Christians.
I see people who are united by their love of the United States of America, tired
to give all of our children a better life.
I just want to address that.
Well, I'm going to make this clear.
But when you have people who start to say,
my ethnic group deserves something and yours doesn't,
or that ethnic group is good and this other ethnic group is bad,
that is how you erode the very foundations of commonality
and common citizenship that we need to continue to have
the United States be the most powerful and prosperous nation
anywhere in the world. So when I see Abdul El Sayed talk about white supremacy being the
root of opposition to Sharia law. When I see a guy like Abdul El Sayed empathize not with
the innocent children at Temple Israel or the security guards, but empathize with the
person who committed that atrocious crime. When I see Abdul El-Said campaigner
campaign around the state with somebody who said that America deserved 9-11, what
I see is a man who has sympathy and compassion for people who share his
religion but have nothing for people who don't. A person who will apologize for
a murderer so long as he looks the right way but will not understand the
the plight of an innocent child.
I think one of the craziest parts about this kind of commentary is that they're literally
doing white identitarian politics and claiming that their opposition, Abdul in this instance,
is doing Muslim identitarian politics.
The opposition is obviously not doing that.
You're doing that.
And that's the most insidious way that people do white supremacist politics in this
goddamn country.
People who would defend a killer rather than the school children.
the people who would cast aspersion on the heroes of 9-11 and say that those
attacks were justified or defensible. Ladies and gentlemen, today you have an
opportunity to speak loudly and in defense, you have an opportunity to speak much more loudly.
Everything they say is a fucking lie.
Rise in the United States of America, reject Abdul Sayed and send Mike Rodgers to the US Senate.
I think it's really bad. Now that I've done some of these speeches, it's
It's actually remarkably bad. I've been in a room like this already, right? With a very
different audience demographic, of course. But like, J.D. Vance is really bad at delivering
speeches.
He's going to fight for this country. You have a guy who's going to fight to make
your life better every single day. I looked up a statistic and this pains me to say
as a buckeye because I know you all, how you all feel about Ohio State.
Anyway, god damn his eyeliner is horrendous. Yeah, he's always delivering a lecture. It's
never a sermon. It's always a lecture. It's always condescending. I think, why do you
think both Trump and JDF so far avoided naming you directly in these rallies? I don't know.
I don't know. That is an interesting question. And I genuinely don't know what the answer
is maybe it's because like it would negatively polarize liberals and galvanize liberals to whip
up support in our in in our direction that could be part of it
I think they're smart enough to know most yeah I think that's probably this though yeah
they're smart enough to know most people have no idea who I am and they don't feel the need to
boost my profile. You know what I mean? I think it's because nobody knows who the fuck
you are. I know, look, look, this lady did my name, uh, mentioned my name and this was
the crowd reaction.
He's trying to say, oh, he's some just podcaster, really, he was attached to your hip during
the primary.
Now he's just some podcaster, nice friend you are, right?
Be proud of who you are.
I'm a proud American, and I'm going to share with you, I'm a proud Trump supporter.
that's so funny. Oh God.
Yeah, hold on, hold on. Got to hit him with the classic. You are who your friends with
And then boom
Boom
Gotta hit him with that
Yeah, gotta hit him with the counter the reverse who know baby you gotta hit him with that reverse who know
Oh, you are who your friends with that's interesting interesting take. Okay. That's good to know
Bro's been covered for a month straight on Fox and CNN.
There were like three people who reacted to your name.
Yes.
If this crowd doesn't immediately light up to the mention of my name, it's fucking
over.
Okay.
Let's be real.
If this crowd, because this is the target demo that has been primed, this is the
The target demo that's been primed, all they've seen in their news coverage, every single hour,
every single hour of every single day, twice on a Sunday, it's always, the Sompiker is bad,
the Sompiker is the number one enemy of America, we have to kill Hassan Piker.
And if this crowd, which are so invested in the Republican agenda in Donald Trump,
invested right now that they are taking time out of their day on a Monday afternoon to go listen to JD Vance
If that crowd is not animated by the mere mention of my name
This has been a spectacular failure
That's it
Boomers on both sides trying to fade outrage over a guy. They don't know. He just found out. Yeah
Yeah, this the other thing the old guard is going to lose the Dems in 2028 because they cannot fucking see an opportunity
What it presents itself? He just found out what chat GBT is last week
And you cannot convince me actually knows who was some pikers yet. Jim Clyburn says I support Abdul's election
He is apologized. He says he will not campaign with piker anymore
I think that's worth taking him at his word all of us deserve second chances like as though
So, campaigning with Piker was so horrifying, was so horrifying, that, you know, he's glad,
he's glad that Abdul has apologized and promised he won't see me ever again.
That's awesome.
I mean, look, if that's what it takes, it's great.
Yes, you're right.
Thank you, Mr. Clyburn, for endorsing Abdul Al Said.
trying so hard to make AOC and Bernie scared of you. Yeah, I think that's part of the process here.
It's clearly what the intention is. This is a 2028 play, for sure. It's a 2028 play. It's a play to
to try to make our side and our media platforms less favorable in the eyes of the Democrats,
in the eyes of independents, in the eyes of conservatives, I don't think it's working.
I think they're just, this is a, like every attack that I'm receiving is not just about
me. It's not about me at all, actually. I'm just secondary. I just happen to be
standing in the way of the true attacks. The attacks are actually met in the direction of DSA and
left flank candidates. And it's not just about DSA and left flank candidates either. It's more so
about democracy, right? Because what are DSA candidates doing? What are left flank insurgent
candidates doing? They're just simply presenting an alternative vision. One that the established
Democrats have refused to entertain. A vision that focuses on the needs of the masses
rather than the profit centers of corporations, right? And that's precisely what this is.
That's why they're attacking me. They're not, I'm just a random dickhead. You know what I mean?
I am this, but this is for the first time ever real. In reality, they're not after me,
they're after you. I'm just in the way. It's actually true. Because Donald Trump never
represented the needs of the masses in any meaningful capacity. Donald Trump never did that.
He was the swampiest of the swamp creatures. He said he was going to drain the swamp. He made it worse.
Said he was going to be the peace candidate. He started new wars. He said he was going to tackle the inflation crisis. He made it worse.
Now your food is poison. Now we're embarrassing ourselves on the global stage. All of our allies are running away from us.
China is more popular than the United States of America for the first time in the history of the People's Republic of China.
republic of China. Donald Trump did that. Donald Trump did that. So he was never
actually fighting for the American working class or the working class in
general. He just lied about it. And he was only able to present himself as a
true champion to at least enough people, specifically non-college educated
white people, let's be real, demographically speaking, because the
The Democrats came across as elitist smog out of touch and disinterested in the needs
of the masses.
And Democrats are, once again, establishment Democrats, are once again showing that that
is how they will present themselves in this midterm season, leading into 2028 as well.
By constantly leaning into the Republican smear campaigns, because they think they
They can take care of a factional media outlet this way.
They are hurting their own chances in 2028.
They're hurting their own chances in generating, creating a democratic Senate majority right
now.
It's very clear they would rather lose than allow victory with left-flank insurgents.
Victories that will give more legitimacy to left-flank insurgents and our politics.
that puts your needs first, a politics that puts the needs of the working class first,
not the corporations. And that is what they despise. That is what they oppose. That is
what they are fearful of. They are doing everything in their power to stop that from happening.
At least someone who has been on the receiving end of these ridiculous smears, ridiculous
attacks Bernie Sanders understands exactly what's going on. So I want to start off
there. I want to start off with Bernard Sanders. Okay, before we get to these other videos,
Dave McCormick takes aim at what not. There's an exclusive interview with Bernard Sanders
with Politico from Will Steakin, where they talk about everything that's going on.
Today on the Playbook podcast, we're bringing you an exclusive interview with Senator
Bernie Sanders, where we get into the midterms 2028 and the future of the Democratic
party will give you the highlights and our analysis of that conversation and that's a story
driving the day. Plus we'll dig into some other stories circulating Washington this morning
including some political football literally in Michigan and an NBC anchor who's the latest name
in Trump's burn book. And finally on this Monday morning the three things you need to look out
for in the week ahead. Good morning playbookers I'm Dasha Burns it is Monday August 31st
And with me now, I have Adam Wren and Will Steak in the core Playbook crew.
We are the co-authors of the Playbook newsletter and your hosts of this podcast.
And before we get into the news, we have some personal news.
We've been with you guys for a while now, but today is the official
relaunch of our bright and shiny new Playbook.
Adam, Will, it's going to be all right, guys.
Yeah, it's been a super fun month or so behind the helm officially of Playbook.
we've had a lot of fun scoops that have been driving the day. Whether it's been detailing
the donor conversation that Abdul El Sayed had about putting Senator John Federman up as an ogre
on a pike before the contested Michigan primary or revealing Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro's
efforts to lure LeBron James to Philadelphia or even his bromance with DHS Secretary
Mark Wayne Mullin, has been quite a news-filled ride.
Yeah, I couldn't be more thrilled. And yeah, like Adam said, it's been really great for the
past month or so. And more and more exclusive interviews, reporting, like we've been doing.
Okay, okay. All right, let's get the birdie and we'll speak in.
Results. And their warning, it feels like a lot of momentum in that wing.
There's some, obviously, doubters. There's, you know, Third Way is a group that, I see you smiling,
Third Way is a group that, you know, they're looking at the results and they're warning
Democrats, quote, don't follow the siren song of the left. They will steer their ships into the
rocks. What is your response? Let me ask you this question. Where does Third Way get its money
from strong grassroots support.
I don't think so.
Look, you've got a lot of these groups out there
who get money from the billionaire class,
whether it's whatever it may be, crypto, AI, APAC,
whatever it may be.
And their job is to protect the interests of the wealthy
and the powerful and maintain the status quo.
And then they come up with all kinds of theories
why supporting candidates who really are not interested
bringing about change is the right way to go. Let's elect candidates who have nothing to say about
the crises facing America, who are not proposing any serious changes, who take money from, you know,
super PACs. Those are the guys we want. That's really the future of the Democratic Party.
What I think you're seeing all over the country is ordinary people say no, that it's not the
future of the Democratic Party. And what amazes me, what amazes me, whether it was Angie
Nixon in Florida. She got out spent 16 to 1. Abdul El Sayed had, what was it, $60 million
in super PAC money spent against him? 10 to 1. Peggy Flanigan, 5 to 1. The billionaires
are pouring in all this money and yet we are winning elections. So no, I don't take
what Third Way has to say terribly seriously in terms of policy or in terms of day-to-day
politics.
You mentioned El Sayed. After his primary win, you called it, I think, one of the most extraordinary
political wins you've ever seen.
Correct.
It feels like a lot is writing on him in terms of progressive movement heading into November.
What is a piece of advice you would give to him heading into November for him?
Well, I think, again, in all due respect, I think it's a good friend of mine. I think
He is running an extraordinary campaign to, the reason I called his victory extraordinary
is you tell me of a candidate in a major race who was outspent the kind of way he was outspent.
He took on not only money, took on the democratic establishment in Michigan, national Democrat
body, and he wins.
That's pretty unheard of.
So I don't have to advise a bill.
He knows what he is doing and he's running a very good race.
And I think what he understands, and what I would say to him when I talk to him as I
will shortly, I'm sure, stay on the issues that impact working families in Michigan.
He is a doctor.
And one of the reasons I really hope very much that he is elected to the Senate is
we have nobody in the Democratic caucus who is a doctor.
And he wrote a book called Medicare for All.
So he understands how dysfunctional and broken the consciousness.
Yeah, literally wrote the book on it.
to use his help in the fight to guarantee health care every minute like Medicare for all
And an opposition to Israel are the two like the top two election winners. Okay
They have wide cross-party support
And Abdullah al-sayed wrote the book on one of those things
And has been getting sniped
For his opposition to israel non-stop
Raising his credibility enough on that front
Okay, yes data centers are the new meta block cameras are the new meta
But you have to understand these two things are are currently like, you know, very high priority and have been
And have been impactful in previous election cycles as well Medicare for all has been a
Major major policy demand from the base of the Democratic Party for longer than a decade at this point
So that's huge and as far as Israel goes it was one of the biggest it was one of the the biggest issues
In 2024 and it's been an ongoing issue that Democrats refused to address
So this is pretty I mean, it's pretty good. You'd want to be in his shoes and
Woman and child under a Medicare for all system. So I I do when I speak to him talk about
what you're going to do to guarantee health care to all people. Talk about
raising the minimum wage to a living wage. Talk about the climate change and how
we can create millions of good paying jobs, transforming our energy system.
Talk about the needs of low-income and working families. Through that you're
going to win and I think he will. At least the past few days it seems like
there's still some work to do in terms of you know consolidating
coalescing Democrats to unify the party behind him. How concerned are you right now, wherever
you stand, that the party hasn't fully coalesced behind him?
All right. See, when you talk about the party, all right, what do you think you're talking
about? There's a lesson I learned when I ran for president. The party was like millions
of people at the grassroots level who are saying loudly and clearly they do not want
Abdul Al-Sayed as the next senator from Michigan. No. What are you talking about?
What you're talking about is the establishment. Right? You're talking about a small number of people
who are at the head of the Democratic Party. You're talking about the donor class, people who
contribute large sums of money to the Democratic Party. Are they less than enthusiastic about
Abdul-Al-Sayed? Yes, they are. Will they come in line? I think they will because you know why.
Whether they like Abdul or not, they want to win that seat because you need that seat to
in the majority. But it is no great secret, look, that there is a division within the Democratic
party between those of us who are fighting for progressive ideas that take on the oligarchy
that stand with the working class and another part of the party that looks at the world a little
bit differently. You mentioned like specifics. In the last few days, folks like Hakeem Jeffries,
Ken Martin, you know, a handful of Democrats in Congress have come out and, you know,
kind of blasted one of Elsaiad's surrogates, Hasan Piker. You know, I'm curious if you have any
thoughts on those comments. Do you think Elsaiad needs to take more
sense to distance himself from Hasan Piker? Look, I think he is running a great campaign.
he will make his own decisions. It doesn't need my advice.
Piker is a podcast that was on the air, I guess, every single day, saying all kinds
of things. Like every other podcast in the world, he says dumb things that people should,
you know, reject. You got a president of the United States and senators who talk about
Muslims as terrorists, jihadists. I mean, outrageous things. You're seeing people
the Republican Party saying, you know, the most racist kind of things you could
burn a
he says some things sometimes he says things that people need to reject it's
fine he's a terrible person this is something I'm kidding no no norm comes
after you for not reading enough now Bernard rakes you through the calls I
I know all the, all the boomers.
Yeah. He knows better than anybody else what this looks like.
Okay. I think that's part of the reason why he, he, you know,
has a, he doesn't play by these, uh, by these rules,
like the disavow rules where he's just like, yeah,
this is dumb. It's a distraction.
Imagine, uh, I hope that people will focus on that as well.
But in my view, Abdul is running a strong campaign.
I think he's gonna win because he is focusing
on the real issues impacting the people
of the state of Michigan.
I'm not gonna ask you a question.
This is the actual disciplining operation?
Not really.
I mean, he didn't say like Abdul should distance himself
from a Sompiker or anything like that.
He's quick to put out that he was smeared just the same.
Yeah.
questions about Hassan Piker's forgive me but I don't know but I want to get it
something because what I'm curious because Republicans clearly have a
strategy to turn him into a boogeyman right and I'm wondering are our
Democrats taking the bait here over what we're so I mean apparently it works
when you and others will talk about mr. Piper he is a podcaster last they're
putting out when they're putting out statements right so I understand what
And the other statements are that I'm a communist or that this person is what I mean
It's hard to keep up with what we are or that Muslims are terrorists, you know and
What that shows and I think the American people are gonna see through that look
When you are a political party from Trump on down
That has nothing to say about a healthcare system, which is broken and which is widely
expensive, whose function in the world is to make huge profits for the insurance companies
and the drug companies, when you have nothing to-
You know, people always point to Zoran for messaging discipline.
Who do you think perfected the messaging discipline? Always stay on message.
Immediately, he's like, look, they're gonna smear you. It doesn't matter.
It's because what are they gonna do? They wanna steal. They wanna steal your money.
They want to never give you health care. They want to
They they they want to continue this corrupt financial system
Like that's him. He'd been doing this for 80 years, man
He's been doing this for 80 years
It was a zaron that started the the message judo message jiu jitsu it was burning
Sounds like Bernie knows you only through fear and yeah, he's again
854 years old of course. He's been on the fucking show multiple times. He just doesn't
It's fine. He doesn't need to think about what I do or or who I am or what like
You know what my job is okay. I'm glad that he knows what a podcast is
say about the need to raise a 7 so he also elevated my status from radio man radio show
to podcast the $7.25 an hour minimum wage when you think the climate change is a hoax
when you're working with the big tech oligarchs to push data centers all over the country.
You know what you got nothing to say about the real issue. So what do you come over?
Bernie Sanders is a communist, you know, complete nonsense. Socialism is communism.
Mundani is a whatever he is lately, you know, you come up with these stupid charges because
you are intellectually bankrupt and you cannot deal with the real issues facing the American
people. Our job is to talk real issues, to refute their stupid, often bigoted charges.
I think we do that we're gonna do just fine. But from what you've seen over the past few days
Do these Democrats want to see El Sayed lose? Do you think there's Democrats that want to see that happen?
Well, you know, it's a funny thing
The answer is there are some who make I think most you kind of got your back on this one
Yes, of course. He has my back on this one. What are you talking about? He he?
Bernie is not a fool
This is what this is his lives mission
Okay, a lot of people genuinely don't understand like I have my disagreements with Bernie at times
But if there's one thing
If there is one thing that we unite on it is that America needs changes and needs to move in the direction of socialism and
And Bernie this is his lives mission
This is what he has been trying to do his whole life
And this is the closest he has ever gotten to achieving to realizing that goal, right?
And for years and years, for years and years, for basically demanding these necessary functions of the government to work at the behest of the citizens, he has been smeared endlessly.
So, so if there's one guy who understands what it's like to be in the spotlight and to have, you know, all of the things that you've said be filtered through the most negative lens for the entirety of the establishment.
the entirety of the the mainstream outlets and legacy publishers to like put the crosshairs on you and
smear you and tarnish a reputation
For wanting to fight for what's best for the American working class Bernie is the guy who knows that better than anybody else when he was
Doing this in 2016. He was a lot lonelier
than he is now a
lot of you are
On the younger side despite the fact that we just did the census
right and
and many of you are around my age or even older, but here's the reality, when
Bernie Sanders came out in 2016 against Hillary Clinton, we didn't have as robust
a movement. We just didn't have that. We didn't have the media for it. We didn't
have the independent outlets. There were some, but it was nowhere near as popular as mainstream
media was. We also didn't have the Democratic Socialists of America, the grassroots mobilization
capabilities. We didn't have any of that. And Bernie was out there pretty much alone.
establishment backing, no prominent Democrats to come out and help them. Every single person,
the same way that they're attacking me right now, every single person attacked him in 2016.
Over and over and over again, and they rat-fucked them. They did everything they could to steal
the election and hand the victory to Donald Trump, okay? They did it again in 2020. This
time the movement was a little bit bigger, but also Bernie's opposition was a more favorable
group of establishment Democrats. Not Hillary Rodham Clinton, who was a widely despised figure
in American politics, but this time it was a coalition of unique Democrats that were in
opposition. They coalesced behind Joe Biden and 2020 happened, but at least Biden won.
But in 2024, we understood why that was a failure. The warnings that I was delivering,
the warnings that we were delivering about what it would look like to put Biden as the,
to deliver the selection victory in the primaries to Biden would blow up in our
phases. We kept warning about this. Those warnings became a reality. By 2024, Biden was despised.
There was obviously inflation, one and a half years of negative real wage growth that was
massively consequential. The administration's inability to address those issues paired up with
the fact that Biden was not a communicator anymore because he was in he was just his brain
was leaking out of his ears it was incapable of communicating uh even the good stuff that his
administration was responsible for and then we swapped out Biden for Kamala Harris and Kamala
Harris ran to the center Kamala Harris pivoted to the center and then Donald Trump won again
It's important to understand that once that second defeat came, liberals actually, self-identifying
liberals lifelong, blew no matter who voters realized that the electability argument was
actually lying to them.
The electability argument that was presented was simply marketing to get those liberals
to vote for right-wing candidates, for centrist candidates who were still losing to the
Republicans.
So it destroyed the narrative that you have to pivot to the center to win against the Republicans.
It destroyed it.
There were a lot of liberals.
Maybe some of you actually realized that Bernie was right only recently.
The reason why I'm bringing all this up is because Bernie has gone through that process a million times over.
He understands better than anybody else what it's like to be in the crosshairs of the establishment to be attacked mercilessly
or simply fighting for the working class.
That's it.
So of course, even if he's not aware of everything that I'm doing, he's tangentially aware of
it, and he's aware of his own experiences at least, that he can empathize with the situation
that I'm in.
Anyway, let's see what the majority report had to say about this class.
Like asking the question, do establishment Democrats want to all say had to lose?
And so that's kind of the context that he's speaking to Sanders here about.
We should say, when Politico is writing this, when Politico is writing this.
It shows.
If this is not conspiratorial anymore, this is what, if Politico is writing this, it means
that this is being spoken about in D.C. openly.
Of course.
Yes.
I'm not going to ask you a ton of questions about Hasan Fikers.
Forgive me.
I don't like people.
No, no.
but i want to get something is what
i'm curious because republicans clearly have a strategy to turn him into a
bogeyman
right
and i'm one of the ones that i'm sorry in the big let's be clear where this
started
this did not start with republicans
this did not start with the republicans
because republicans
are at least smart enough to realize like
nobody knows who this guy is
this started
with
the near attendance
with the bulwark people with the third way
that's who this started with
yet
they got real pissed off was all wrong
and that prop them
uh... that that uh... prompted them to take action
with the op-dual race ahead of time
right
you know it's ironic
another smear campaign that started with near-attending
the obama birtherism conspiracy
that is a nether
racist ass islamic phobias attack
initiated with the democrats the center's democrats and then
took on an entire life of its own
with the republican party
Yes, Hillary Rodham Clinton 2008 in the primaries near attendant and her team.
Took the, uh, the, the racist conspiracy, Barack Obama was a secret Muslim and sent it to the
drudge report and the drudge report reported on it.
And then of course, after Obama won, that took a life of its own on the Republican
party side. And then Donald Trump carried that as well. But yeah, yeah, Carl Beyer near a
hyping that Tikiya trope is reminding me of two things. One, it was popularizing us as
a way to suggest that Obama was a secret Muslim. And it was deputy campaign manager of Clinton
2008 when it was accused of spreading rumors that Obama was a secret Muslim.
Yeah, Clinton Aids claim Obama photo wasn't intended as a smear.
Yep.
near attendance strongly denies this claim but to be fair she might have been drunk off her ass yeah
anyway jonathan shate
uh david sorota the long time sanders aid and 2020 camp base beach brother spoke plainly if the
democratic leadership could find a way to win the senate and have obduluse i'm sure they would
take that bargain. Jonathan Shate is so hopped up on supremacist values in his own echo chamber
that he doesn't realize what this sounds like. And he takes ownership over this quote by saying,
why would a Democratic leadership take an outcome where they win the Senate but lose one particular
race. Why would the Democratic Party drop a race? What do you think 52 isn't better than 51?
It's basic math. Are you fucking stupid? Like, can you imagine openly taking ownership over this,
openly taking ownership over, like, throwing aside one race? Why would you not want to win
as much as possible jonathan are you fucking dumb
and watch hot ali obviously calls masses there you go folks right in the open
told you handicap l7 lou at l7 lose michigan to magamite rogers but means
weakening the majority that opposed corporate money apagin israel's genocide
i'm sorry this is israel first this is israel first politics that's precisely
what it is. And I'm glad, I am happy that Jonathan Shate is open and honest about it, okay? That's it.
He is saying the quiet part out loud. Now, will Democrats look at that and go,
all right, maybe we shouldn't listen to Jonathan Shate any longer. Jonathan Shate, who,
you know, famously wrote about how Donald Trump wouldn't be that bad.
Jonathan Shate, who famously wrote in 2024 about how Kamala Harris' pivot to the
center was actually going to be excellent and how she was certainly going to win the election
because she pivoted the center in the way that Jonathan Chey wanted. Perhaps we should stop
listening to these fucking morons. Seems to me the dem party should try to win as many
sentences as possible. Seems bad that corporate dems are fine with their party losing a senate
race and risking a narrower senate majority are actually losing congress just a sabotage
As a candidate, their donors don't like.
Now you might be asking yourself, why would someone like Jonathan
Shate openly say the quiet part out loud?
Well, there's two reasons.
One, because he's in an echo chamber and he's surrounded by people who also
are like-minded individuals, just like Jonathan Shate, that one,
I'll say I had to lose.
That's number one.
And number two, he knows he will never get punished for this perspective
because this is the only perspective in the Beltway.
This is the only perspective that is born out of the Establishing Media Smear campaign.
It's the only perspective that he hears from Republicans.
It's the only perspective that he hears from Democrats, Establishing Democrats.
It's the only perspective that you hear in Washington, DC.
And that's precisely the reason why he won't get punished for it, okay?
That's it.
it. There will not be news articles. There will, there will not be endless coverage on
Jonathan Shate's insanity here. Wait, did Albu Osebetrez? No, he did not. He did not.
Calm down guys. Anyway, let's get back to Bernie talking about how established Democrats
are actively trying to take Abdul's chances.
is we may not like El Sayed, we may not like Angie Nixon, but you know what, if we win
Michigan and if by some miracle we win Florida, you know what, we're going to control the
U.S. Senate.
And we would like very much to control the U.S. Senate.
On the other hand, are there some, I think a few, who will say, you know what, it's
not worth it.
These people are a threat to oligarchy.
are a threat to American foreign policy and our continued support for the extremist Netanyahu
government in Israel. They're a threat to the never-ending wars that have gone on for decades.
So, no, maybe we should let them lose. But I think that is a small minority because most
Democrats say, you know what, really would be nice to control the House and the Senate.
Over what we've seen over the primary with all these progressive DSA candidates winning, it's
kind of, you know, stirred up the establishment to come back. And there's a lot of like backlash to
it. We spoke to House Democrat, Jared Moskowitz, who told me, you know, basically, DSA, Dem Socialists,
they can't exist in the Democratic Party, called them anti-American to their core.
What do you think about that? And then also in terms of like the DSA?
I think it's really funny that these guys are constantly saying DSA has no place in the
Democratic Party when DSA is winning in spite of the money canon being deployed in their
direction because democratic voters are voting for our candidates or our movement.
Meanwhile, the people who are attacking us, unironically, don't have a place in the Democratic
Party. They don't. They're currently in charge, but they genuinely do not have politics that the
base likes, that the base desires. No one is running around going, oh my god, can I please
get a fucking Democrat in charge that will give more money to Israel? Can I please elect
more people that are going to stand in opposition to Medicare for all. No one in the base is
saying that. They're only winning because they deploy the money can in every single time
or they're in districts where they have decent constituent services and they're an established
name and they can move money around. That's the only reason why they keep winning. And
they're losing more and more even though the odds are the deck is stacked in their
favor, the odds are in their favor. The amount of
incumbencies that have been flipped in this cycle alone is
unprecedented, okay? Unprecedented in American
history. Do you understand? The Tea Party was backed by the
Koch brothers. It was an astroturf movement and they
were only to get like, they were only able to get two or I
think maybe four flips. I think they were able to unseat
two incumbents, two. That was back in 2010. Or was it four? Oh, yeah, they got four. We have 10 so far
in this cycle, 10. And we didn't do it. It was two incumbents and two open seats. Sorry.
We got 10 so far.
Do you understand how unprecedented that is? And we didn't do that with billionaire funding.
We didn't do that with billionaire funding. We did it against billionaire funding. So
of course the establishment is fucking panicking. Of course they're panicking because there's
a real appetite for change and we're delivering that change and they do not
want that change. They do not want to have to deal with that change in their
own ranks. And it's heading to Congress potentially next year like what what
would your advice be to them? My advice would be is to law dumb remarks like
like Mr. Muswitz.
And I hope that he does understand that his views,
and I don't wanna speak beyond what I know here,
but I assume he is very pro-Israeli government
is my impression that that is a tiny minority
of where the Democrats are.
I would say him, take a look at the polling
that's going on all over America.
You may have won your election, congratulations.
But take a look and the truth is
that a majority of the American people
do not want to continue to provide billions of dollars
to the extremist government in Israel
and among the Democrats, the number is off the charts.
So I don't quite understand how somebody like Mr. Moskowitz
could tell those people to hold that position,
not to be in the Democratic caucus
when it is the overwhelming majority position of Democrats.
I would say the same thing on issues like Medicare for all.
You may have seen a poll come out.
It was a few weeks ago,
64% of Americans now support Medicare for all,
huge majority of Democrats support the same.
So I think it is Mr. Moskowitz and his friends
who are way out of touch,
as to where the base of the Democratic Party is.
So that was the Bernard thing.
And then the rest of it is just them
talking about the interview.
There's a really good Abdul El Saad hit on here as well
from the breakfast club.
We'll take a look at that as well.
But here is the Republicans' real correlation.
Every day of week, come on, wake your ass up.
United States, United States,
Senator Ronald Reagan,
David McCormick.
Yeah, Dave McCormick takes aim
at Democrats for campaigning with the St.Pyker,
accuses Dems of anti-Semitism.
This was his, like, this was a big part
of his fucking speech, apparently.
Dave McCormick, Pennsylvania Republican, Pennsylvania Republican at the Republican Jewish Coalition
Leadership Summit, spoke extensively about this.
We're going to skip it.
We're going to, I just want to see where the opposition, where the opposition is coming
from what they're saying. Um, but yeah,
they McCormick is the only guy in PA politics hated more than Fetterman.
Yeah.
You may remember I was here last year and so when that call invited me back,
I jumped at the chance with you.
I would not admit says assessing out just a couple of months before such an
incredibly important midterm election.
I don't need to tell you that the stakes could not be high for our country, for our party,
and for the Jewish people, and if the other team can't even bring itself to walk away
from the Son of Piper, for Western civilization itself.
And that brings me to my personal, what a difference the year makes.
Last year I served here celebrating President Trump's victories on issues we all care so deeply about.
I sat on this very stage with Douglas Murray discussing the rise of anti-Semitism.
And since then, we've watched it move towards the mainstream on the left, and to a lesser degree
in the right. Now, I'm proud to stand with the RDC in condemning and ostracizing anti-submitting voices
with an armed movement. But we- and we-
Yeah. By the way, this is something that I noticed in this conference.
Remember how I said earlier, the MAGA crowd in fucking Michigan?
The MAGA crowd in Michigan is supposed to be the primary demographic that's supposed to
go boo when you mention my name and there's crickets?
This is actually the one crowd where it should literally lead to an applause break.
He doesn't even get it here.
at the Republican Jewish coalition, if you can't get a sufficient applause break, a crowd
pop from the, you know, from a Hassan Piker mentioned, you have to give up on this endeavor.
Okay. Republican Jewish coalition seminar attendees, like those are the guys who want
to actually kill me. They're MAGA, they're conservative, they already hate me for that
Reason the pro-Israel they hate me for that reason as well
No booze no booze even in this crowd it's cooked
Why did you do an interview with Horitz
What kind of fucking dumb question is this brother? I talked to every outlet including Fox News
I'll go on fucking channel 12. I'll go on channel 14 if necessary
Yeah, it was a good interview. I am trying to do Jewish outreach. I've given an interview to JTA as well.
I've given an interview to National Review as well. What do you mean? Is this the new meta? Are we just gonna yell about this too?
to? Oh, no, this is the reason why people are criticizing it is because they consider Haaretz
to be normalizing. Okay. Haaretz is an Israeli outlet. And they consider it to be normalizing.
There are a lot of people in the pro-Palestine movement. There are a lot of people in the
the Propel Sign Movement who have differences in opinion. They don't just abide by the Palsy
National Coalition's BDS list. They have their own BDS list. It's the attitude from people
Primarily in the western, in the western world, who, who have their own mindset.
Like Horace is not a good outlet necessarily, but it doesn't matter.
Like para power mapping is just fun.
It's fine.
Yeah, even, even, uh, Gatto Fomante, Queenie Ellis, I agree with a lot of this, but as
arguable, the Harris doesn't really qualify as complicit state cultural institution or
vehicle for state propaganda.
And moreover, journalistic engagements are generally excluded from the cultural boycott.
In fact, PAC BI itself has been interviewed by Harris several times.
Yeah, the argument comes from people saying, look, I don't even hate power politics or
whatever. I, you know, I don't really care to discuss this stuff as much because I feel
like it's, it's not, it's just going to invite additional negative attention their
way for no reason. I don't want anybody to go and like yell at these people. Yeah,
Clonopin is a good follow. I like his output for the most part, even though sometimes I obviously
disagree with, you know, shit that he's saying. But ultimately, ultimately, here's the thing.
Here's the thing. Just do, just say the truth. Just say what you mean. Obviously frame your
position to the audience that you are talking to without betraying your principles, without
betraying your values. And ultimately, if people are going to trip, they're going to trip. It doesn't
matter. Like of course I'm going to give an interview to Haritz. Of course, what are you
talking about? I've given interviews to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency as well.
The idea that we can't speak to otherwise Zionist newspapers and deliver an anti-Zionist message
is hilarious because every fucking news outlet is pro-Israel every news outlet in this country and
pretty much in the Western world and certainly in Israel is going to be pro-Israel to varying degrees
the New York Times broadly speaking is far more pro-Israel in its output than even how ours is
at times, okay? They're both pro-Israel, of course they are. But Zionism in Israel is a
bit different. Zionism in Israel just means every Israeli outlet and every Israeli party
with the exception of like one. No greater example of this focus on operation is failing
miserably than vote hub moving Michigan to lean D from toss up because of polls trending
towards Abdul after the smear campaign started people fucking hate major media yes my job
my job is to reach as many people as I possibly can with this message okay with our movement
the put us in front of as many eyeballs as possible.
This is what I do.
Yeah, the BDS guidelines are applied to the individual.
In your case, you didn't pay promoter deny the Palestinian cause.
You instead directly communicate about it. There is a category and exception you didn't
violate BDS. Countering normalization is all about providing ethical and political guidance
to join activities projects between Arabs, including Palestinians and Israeli individuals
and groups in order to protect our struggle and ensures that such joint activities are
not used to normalize oppression, but rather contribute to the Palestinian-led struggle
to end it.
From the BDS guideline.
I think at most people who have been critical of my horrid interview are critical because
I say that, you know, heinous acts of violence took place on October 7, which it did. And
I still reframe it within the context of 75 years of apartheid and occupation, which is
my position. So I guess at that point, you disagree with my position. There is no, there
is no, from my perspective, there is no reason to deny that, that heinous acts of violence
did take place on October 7. We've seen it. Like, what do you mean? You have to
Recognize the facts and then frame it within the context of a 75 year occupation the fuck
It's very dumb
Yes, that's why I think the the nap turner comparison is apt
The nap turner comparison the norm Finkelstein made in God's grave diggers is apt. It's a perfect comparison
Not the beheaded babies though. Yes, of course. I'm not talking about whatever made up shit that people are talking about
I always liked how Zoran put it. He described it as war crimes and not terrorism. It was a legitimate military action included many criminal acts
Yes
And it was not anchored it was not anchored by anti-semitism in the way that people
Claimed it was and I always contest that
Like this is the this is the problem
Also, none of it justifies Israel's retaliation. None of it justifies genocide
And if you're going to critique and parse through the individual war crimes that took place on October 7, you can't do that without criticizing the occupation that led to October 7.
That is the reason why people come after me so aggressively, because the expectation is, oh, Hamas bad, Israel good, October 7 bad, nothing else bad.
That is the the that is the disciplining operation is the purpose of the disciplining operation a lot of people don't understand this
Okay
When you say he decides to violence a lot of people will read that as well as the responses justified you don't pick your words well
Oh
Buddy I
Think you got duped by one fucking paragraph that you saw and you didn't even read because you saw you heard the word
heinous and you instantly locked in on it and you didn't see what came after that because I said exactly this you fucking idiot
Use your goddamn brain use your brain, please one of the biggest issues with those on the left
Whether it be the anti Zionist cause or whether it be the socialist cause is that we
understandably
Recognize that we're on the morally righteous side, but because of that
We have this inability to understand how to communicate with people who have differing opinions
Okay, people who have a difference in opinion. We just go no, we're right. So everyone should understand it
That's not how anything works. Okay. That's not how this works. You cannot
You cannot have the expectation that
People who have never encountered your worldview are automatically going to come to your side because you're morally correct
You have to convince people. Okay, it is one of the biggest problems on the left
Broadly, okay, we do this all the fucking time. We do it endlessly
It is our like our steadfastness is our biggest strength and that comes from our moral convictions
100% but also
Our demand for purity and our inability to understand that we must convince others
also becomes our biggest weakness. We come across as obnoxious, we come across as
smug, and sometimes we come across as insane. We still have to convince people.
It makes us look insufferable. It's not the only reason and it's far from the
the major reason as to why the left has been able to,
the left has had a significant inability to address
these crises and reach broader sub-sex of American society.
Obviously there are a million different structural hurdles
that we have to overcome, but why make it more difficult?
Why make it more difficult?
What war crimes are arms, this is not justified
They're no baby beheading nor evidence of military manatee rapes. See this is where we arrive at me going through each
Individual act in each individual crime dog. You've seen the footage. That's all I'm going to say
okay
This isn't to say God
This is when
Marxist Leninists and those to my left
force me into a conversation where I have to look like I'm shitting on the left.
I don't want to do it. I don't want to do this experience. I don't want to go
through this experience. Not because it makes me look bad. It's because it makes
you look fucking insane, okay? Please, I beg you, understand, understand those to
my left. The reason why I don't actively try to parse through what your
perspective is and what the problems are is because if we move besides the point
of like the excesses of Stalin or Mao Zedong it's going to come across like
I'm a reactionary that's a you know tackling my left flank in an effort to
appease the needs of liberals okay because by and large most people do
not have a positive opinion on the likes of Lenin let alone Stalin we're
not talking about Stalin now they don't even like Lenin okay that's why
I always laugh when people are just like oh dude you're just fucking hyping up
Mao Zedong in an effort to win support what support what are you talking about
what are you fucking talking about snap out of it you fucking idiot most people
think Lenin Stalin Mao these are worse figures than Hitler in America they
think these are worse figures than Hitler there is no broad base of support
for Vladimir Ilyich or Leonov in the United States of America. Get out of your fucking bubble.
What do you want me to do? Constantly fucking show the liberals how good I am?
By attacking my left flank, should I do that? I could do that. I don't do that.
Some of you are stupid enough to think that I don't do that because
some of you are dumb enough to think that I don't do that because it's too powerful.
Okay? That the spirit of Lenin will captivate the the uninitiated masses all of a sudden to engage in
proletarian violence or something to form a vanguard party. That's not the reason, dumbass. It's
because I think it's pussy shit to constantly talk about how normal I am. Look at how crazy these
guys are. Look at how crazy these guys are to my left. It's for you. Okay? It's not for me.
I'm out you're shitting on the left now. No, I'm not even doing that. I'm just shitting on the I
Hate this. I hate this practice. I hate this conversation. We're moving on. Fuck it. It doesn't matter. Let's get to Abdul El Sayed on the breakfast club. Okay
Please stop. We have to keep this movement together. Okay, please.
Please.
You understand?
If I wanted to win favor, I could be the near-attended of the socialism movement.
I could just spend every waking moment constantly shooting on Marxist Leninist,
Maoist, Anarchist, non-stop.
Look at me.
Look at how good I am.
Actually, I'm the normal one.
These guys are the abnormal ones.
Do you understand?
There is tremendous appetite for stuff like that.
But that is record behavior, ultimately.
That is record behavior.
Even if I, I probably would get a lot more positive.
uh... i would probably get a lot more positive ratings
from many of these like
socialist sympathetic liberals
who are terrified of the prospect of someone
who uh... will will talk about the nuances of our foreign adversaries
that immediately go all your tanky all your this your dad urn
authoritarian that's the reason why they write articles about me calling me a
fucking authoritarian and illiberal all the goddamn time is my refusal
to engage
in those sorts of conversations.
Okay.
Most people are unbelievably antagonistic to our position,
and they don't even know your position
if you are further to my left,
at least in the way that you want to communicate
on these issues.
Because I don't even think you're further to my left,
let's be fucking real.
Anyway,
Yeah, Tim Miller's his despicable anti-muslim woke right garbage from the house CBS account.
Yep.
I'm going to show the breakfast club DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, Shalemaine, the God Envy and
Jess are not here.
But Lauren LaRosa LL Cool Bay is Angela Rye is here as well.
So Angela Rye is here.
That means that somebody in the political sphere must be in the room.
And we.
She was the one who was a kind of cook in Tala Frico a little bit on the genocide on his refusal to say that Israel had committed a genocide. Angela Rye was that person.
Yeah, I'm not going to report on breaking news yet.
I
Abdul al Sayed got it. I nailed it nailed it. You're welcome. He helped me pronounce
It's one of those that my parents really did me a favor with that name. They're like you're gonna your destined for politics
I'm like couldn't have been like Pete
He's running for Democratic candidate of US Senate in Michigan and I like you Abdul because you're a disruptor
Hey, I like a good disruptor. We need some disruption 100%
I mean that's the thing about our politics right now is everybody looks at him like why are
Why is this like this? And people give you the same talking points, and then they
tell you, oh you should you should deliver with a little bit more charisma. So you
got people out here being like, healthcare. And you're like, what are you gonna do about
my healthcare? Like, healthcare. But this authenticity is not the style of the way
you said the word authenticity is about saying the same thing consistently
everywhere you go. And being willing to speak to the why of the thing, not
just the what of the thing, is I'm not supposed to run for office. I'm a
doctor by training rebuild health departments that this was my name is
Abdulrahman the whole thing Abdulrahman Muhammad say it come out of parts of people's throats
You don't know they have I
Mean that's a whole thing. I'm not gonna ask you to pronounce that I couldn't boss it all over you
But that's the thing about is that like you know at some point you get sick and tired of watching people
Get into this system that you train to be a part of
No, not to get the things they need except for to come out with a huge bill
Mm-hmm, and you start to ask, okay
Why is this like this and why is no one doing anything about it in the end of day?
You know, I think we'll probably get here in the in the conversation
But when you have a public consensus here getting the broader public believes one thing and a political he's truly mom Donnie's Wario
It's it's real. Hi, would you invite JD Vance except for maybe you got a Vance romance? I
Don't know like questions about JD Vance. They're Legion. We don't have more couches here than they have in Ohio
I'm just trying to figure out why he would come.
He called him a couch fucker.
Two very different styles coming from guys who are somewhat aligned on many issues.
Zoramumdani plays the role of the kind face, he's always smiling, he's trying to do his
very best to be like, see I'm unassuming, I'm not, I'm not violent, I'm not rat
political, please don't yell at me." Abdul, on the other hand, is like, no, liberals are
fucking pissed off. I'm a liberal and I'm pissed off. That's what he's saying, right? And he
carries that resentment that a lot of liberals have right now towards the Republican Party.
Now, I think one of the biggest reasons as to why there's this major difference, one
One of the biggest reasons is because Abdul was born in America, Zoran is not.
I think that's part of what it is.
Abdul grew up in an environment where he excelled as an American.
Zoran grew up in an environment where he was still somewhat of an immigrant, right?
He came to the United States when he was seven years old.
He has a very different attitude about everything.
In some respects, I take it one step even further than Abdul because I'm also white.
I was born here.
I love this country, but also I have I grew up in Turkey and then when I came to the United
States of America, regardless of my name, like I was socialized in an environment where
I never thought about being potentially being perceived as a second class citizen or anything,
but, you know, the majority population.
So when I came to the United States of America, I carried that attitude. So I definitely
take a lot more liberties in my language and my style of communication than even
Abdul does. Now part of that is because Abdul is also running for office. I'm not. Mike thinks
you should stop with the I'm White playbook dog. I think it's embarrassing for me to say
I'm anything but fucking a pasty ass white boy who is whose name is Hassan.
My attitude also Mike is white. The fuck does he know? He doesn't understand the nuances
of this. I'm sorry. This is literally one of those instances where like he's white white,
you know what I mean?
Also, consensus over here, meaning the politicians all believe one thing. The difference is usually
Somebody's money and health care. It's big pharma. It's big insurance. It's big med tech. It's big hospitals
inform policy
It's the
Weapons industrial complex military industrial complex. It's a pack right you can name any particular issue
And so at some point you're just like well, you know, I know what my family
never had
And I have but for the accident of history that I get to be born here unlike my cousins born in Egypt
We have democracy that's a precious thing and if it's not working we talk about that democracy not working because they're
Cycling freedom speech and and and taking away the one rights act and that's true
But democracy has been slowly eroding because it's not actually delivering on the thing people want
So at some point I'd be like how much let's let's move this
To see if we can actually do you think your Muslim background has kind of taken presidents over your white privilege as of late for your offset is yes
If my name was Hank
And I was from Kentucky born and raised
There would not be this conversation taking place right now. The conversation taking place right now would be very different
They'd be like oh, he's a radical, but the reception from the audience would be very different
Okay, come on. Yes. I know that I'm not oblivious. Okay
Whiteness in and of itself is an ever-changing concept. Okay
Whiteness just means you're a part of the in-group. Yes a guy by the name of Hassan is not a part of the in-group
I know that, but I'm also explaining like I'm white in the immediate reception.
I get many benefits from that.
I have privileges that others do not.
I have privileges that my uncle doesn't.
When you look at someone like Cenk, whose name is even harder to say than mine, okay?
Obviously he is not, he doesn't get to have the same exact benefits that I do.
i'll give you another example from another prominent turkish uh... fellow
prominent turkish figure in the media that plays ball
with uh... the the powerful entities in this country
doctor os
no one ever treats doctor os
doctor mihmet is
okay
as a foreign agent
Why do you think that's the case?
He's Christian, right?
No, he's not.
No.
See?
No.
No, he's not.
He's Sunni.
He's Sunni Muslim.
No, the reason why you think he's Christian
is because he's a white television personality.
Who is a part of the in-group?
No, this is first name is not Mohammed. It's Mehmet Mehmet is the same name as my dad
Get back to that ideal because democracy beautiful thing what actually works for people
So, you're a physician, so being in healthcare and seeing how unfair healthcare is, that most
people, that would lead you to pilot it?
So look, I went to med school not too far from here at Columbia.
And anybody who's been to New York Presbyterian knows that you've got the basement emergency
room.
That's where they refused to treat Dr. Malcolm X when he was shot right across the street
at the Autobahn.
And then you've got the ninth floor, the Milstein Pavilion, where you've got
International's who come in and pay full cash for whatever procedure
That's like American in quality right there and the difference is your ability to pay and so I had a patient my fourth year
Who exemplified this? I was doing a rotation a little bit further north
and
And this was a indigent woman who'd fallen in her head. It was February
it was slick she was inebriated and
And if she clearly had a well now if you were to go to the emergency right now room right now having hit your head with a
Well, they give you an emergency CT scan why because I got a rule out that there's no bleeding your brain that could kill you
And when I asked the resonance, I asked so what the CT show is I always didn't do one
It's like when I was like, oh, she'd be a social admin
Meaning I got to get her back on the street before she starts withdrawing growing up my Turkish friends told me
Mehmet is Turkish for Mohammed my bad. No it is it is Mehmet is the
Turkish version of Mohammed yes like Yusuf is the Turkish version or the Arabic
Yosef is the Arabic version of Joseph okay it doesn't matter he's just it's a
variant guys but it's not the same it's like there are there is also Mohammed
Mohammed is also a name in Turkey as well that's why I said it's not
entirely the same in my emergency room so I'm just not gonna give her the
standard yes Yusuf you know at the end of the day what's the point wow I
I took care of her for two weeks alongside my attending who was super supportive and
you know, we had this conversation.
I spent a lot of time, she was the kind of patient I got into medicine to take care of.
And then, you know, we had this last conversation.
She was supposed to go to the only rehab facility that took patients with HIV.
Long story short, we diagnosed her with full blown AIDS.
One of the things that HIV can do is it can infest your adrenal glands.
So she had her whole life high blood pressure and now she has low blood pressure.
She had an actively bleeding pelvic mass, diabetic and her blood sugars were everywhere.
Took care of her for two weeks.
Found the only rehab facility that would take somebody who was HIV positive.
And then found housing for her.
So she's entitled to housing because of her HIV status.
And we had the whole thing set up.
Last day we were having a conversation about the plan for like the fourth time.
She said, I'm not doing that.
I'm going home with my daughter.
I was like, man, you didn't tell me I had a daughter.
She said, we didn't ask.
We were like, to be fair, I did.
You know, you were in a state at the time.
She's like, well, you don't tell me what to do.
I said, you're right, I don't.
Two weeks later, I'm going downtown from Washington Heights
to get a meal I'm never gonna forget with my friend.
I step into the subway and she's laid out on the seats.
Wow.
And I go and I check on her, she doesn't remember me.
I go and have dinner with my friend, she's okay.
You know, she's out.
I go and have dinner with my friend.
I go up and I pull my residency application to train.
And at that point I was like,
if we're not serious about the reasons why people end up here, if we're not serious about working on this system
to make sure that it guarantees people health care, because she knew the script, she understood, she wasn't supposed to be there
by accident she gets there because people rush her to the emergency room, she understands what this is going to be
she understands exactly all of this, and at the end of the day, she was a patient, our system's not built to help
meanwhile people paying $30,000 for their heart procedure, flying in from wherever Qatar, right, and our system's more interested in caring for them
they got a pianist on the top floor.
And we can't take care of the most
indigent people who need this health care the most,
so that's what led me down this path.
I built my career in public health,
rebuilt Detroit's health department,
led Wayne County's Department of Health,
Human and Veteran Services.
We put glasses on kids, tens of thousands of them.
I took on corporate polluters to take on the asthma crisis.
We had every school day care and head start
tested for lead in the water,
eliminated medical debt,
built programs to provide free health insurance.
And ultimately at some point you're like,
Look the best I can do is deal with the funds
I've got to manage a department to handle challenges
But what does it look like to actually reshuffle the priorities because at the end of day
What's a budget but but a priority stick and our budget what they want to raise 1.5 trillion dollars of the 7 trillion dollars
That we have and they want to tell us we can't afford health care and childcare
You are I started naturally where you should as a physician and epidemiologist in health care
We're I want to see what the comments look like. It's a hundred K views in five hours is cooking
Please have Angie Nixon on the show breakfast club first out of song then tell Rigo now I'll duel y'all on a roll as a black progressive
I'm happy to see this. Thank you. Now you got Abdul on here. Thank you for amplifying the message
I've met Abdul and Percy was one of the most warm and kind hundred interviews I've ever encountered is true. He really is
He really is a fucking real one man
He really is a real one and right on cue you got this dodging again
I'll say it fails to denounce a song piker again
Yeah, we need engineers and on breakfast club for sure, for sure, for sure, for sure.
Would you go there?
I was on there.
I was on there two months ago right before the New York City primaries and
They just released our interview
They just released our interview and in two days has reached almost half a million views. So
What is this? Is this the first time that they've asked to argue on the merits of your
argument? Yes, it's never happened before. He added, so does Israel have a right to exist?
Deployment as a statement, as a question, as a technique to shift the conversation away
from Israel's crimes against the Palestinians? Make it seem like the opposition is actually
being crazy and they want like all Jews to be exterminated, all Israelis to be
exterminated, which is not the case. That's not a real point of advocacy. It's certainly
not my advocacy. The shimmer continued. UCLA Professor Benjamin Radd refuted Piker's
characterization of Israel in a statement to Fox News Digital.
Piker's comments about Israel as a settler colonial operation and its alleged objective
is seeking out the expulsion or complete extermination of one of the region's indigenous groups reflects
a profound ignorance of the historical development of the land and of the various ethnic religious
and colonial imperial powers, including the Ottoman Turks, that have traded control
over it.
If Piker were intellectually honest, he could hold two uncongruable truths simultaneously
that different groups, including Jews, have legitimate indigenous claims and that
the current Israeli leadership does not represent nor serve as an indictment of those claims,
Brad said. Hell yeah. Finally, this is the first time someone has actually attempted, an academic
has tried to, as has been asked to undermine or provide a counterfactual and failed to do
so. Progress. This is healthy. This is a healthy update. It's a bullshit argument. And that's
precisely the reason why they don't do it usually. Okay. The claim to be like, oh, well, Jews
were indigenous to the land 3,000 years ago is not going to actually justify the current
occupation, certainly. There is no justification for that at all. And last but not least, it
was an ineffective counter. At least there is someone trying to attempt to counter the
argument, right? But it's still an ineffective counter argument regardless. This was, this
This was what they were trying to do initially and very quickly realized is not a very good
argument at all, which is precisely the reason why they can't make the argument, and precisely
the reason why they go with the anti-Semitism smears instead.
It's a dog shit, Hasbrah talking point.
It doesn't deny, he doesn't even deny that Israel is a settler colonial operation.
Okay?
Because it is.
That's exactly what it was from the Balfour Declaration and onward.
And the only thing he tries to lean into is that Jews were indigenous to the region, okay?
Some of those Jews converted to first Christianity and then Islam, okay?
Some of them didn't.
Those are Palestinians.
Those are what you would call Palestinians.
This is such a ridiculous narrative, it's such a ridiculous claim because once again
to say that you have ownership over a land from 3,000 years ago is such a ridiculous
claim that it's become a rallying cry and a joke amongst the youth.
This was promised to be 3,000 years ago is such a stupid argument in and of itself
that people just use it as a joke now, like people literally have turned it into a fucking
mean, you know, it's also not how you, it's also not how you define anything and determine
anything. Like why stop at 3000? Who was there before? Like, you know what I mean?
just so stupid. And also, 3000 years ago gives you a claim of ownership over the land, but 80 doesn't.
Who determines this? Is this how we develop nation states?
The argument that Israel is a land-backed anti-colonialist initiative is a relatively
new one. It's a way to evolve on the Zionist arguments. It's new. It's a totally new argument
from Zionists in particular. Initially, all of the Jewish settlement operations into Palestine
was very open about its colonial ambition.
Jabotinsky directly wrote to Cecil Rhodes
about the colonialist operation that this was,
that Zionism was.
The early Zionist groups had colonialism in their names, right?
It was always, yeah, Zionists have won a Palestine for a very long time, the current
genocide is just the final stage. June 20, 1899, the elect delegates at their meeting in Baltimore
conference of Zionists, I mean, this is like when it was such a tiny miniscule movement for the
record that it's like somewhat irrelevant. But yes, early conference of Zionists openly
talked about how this was a colonial endeavor. Do you want to know why colonialism was in
the language of Zionist back then. Because back then colonialism was not seen as a negative
thing in the Western world. It was just the thing. That's it. It was just a thing that
you did. There was no wokeness back then that was looking at the term colonialism and going,
wait a minute, this seems kind of, this might be considered negative in the future.
destiny this was a this was a positive it was seen as a positive movement it's
just what people did
yeah as a Jew it makes me laugh when people use that argument the ancient
the greeks were there so why don't they get to say the Egyptians as well why not go forward
do the romans get to say as well it makes me laugh because one state that is secular works
solves these problems exactly
yeah there was a non-zero chance that the state of israel was going to either be settled
in Uganda or Argentina. So the idea that this was always a settled affair and that it was
always going to be historic Palestine is silly. Anyway, anyway, let's see. Abdul also has
a really good answer to the Hassan question here. He's asked about it. I want to see what
he says here. This is a recent interview too. So let's take a look.
But but I mean but they control a lot of the the food we have so all that is to say now
If we're serious about terrifying what we should be saying is instead of just having arbitrary tariffs
Because I don't like you and you made me feel small it would be saying where could we use tariffs in a thoughtful way
So we want to be building things in America. We want to protect and promote our auto industry
We want to protect and promote our agriculture industry
So we're gonna have very targeted tariffs with clear
transparent goals for those tariffs and we're gonna say for this time or so long
as we're helping our industry grow we're gonna tear off your goods so we protect
our own industry so people buy local and once this industry grows we want to be
able to sell to you so we're gonna bring those tariffs down and go from there
ultimately though right now this is a vanity project by Donald Trump to do two
things number one exert global control in other countries by saying we're
going to tear if you're good so you basically don't have access to our
market and to to get curry favor with the corporations because now all the
corporations who don't want to be subject to the tariffs know what they do they
come in and say hey what can we do for you so he's trying to grow his own power
like all things Trump it's hamfistic fisted it's chaotic it's self-serving
and it doesn't help us we pay the cost of it there's a world where tariffs
could be valuable this ain't it okay let's talk to Sampaikov you know
Hassan he supported you he campaigned with you he helped introduce you to younger voters and now you're distancing yourself from comments
He made about American Jews in Israel at what point do you have to say I've benefited from this person's platform
So I also have a responsibility to confront him when I think he's wrong. So I'll be honest
This is the this is the odd thing about the way we think about this it'd be like, you know
Come on your show. Let's say I invited you guys out to miss you
I hope you come machine's ready come out and you're like, hey, I'll do a talk to him. I like him
I think he's good. I think I think he cares about you
and then you let's say say something that I disagree with and I'm like I disagree with that thing does that mean that I'm
Condemning you no like not just disagree with the thing you said
So my point is that the way we do politics is like
Everybody thinks they learn the lesson from the 2020s where cancel culture doesn't really work
And now there's this massive effort to cancel Hassan
My point is that I don't do cancel culture. I go everywhere. I talk to everybody. I hang out with you guys
I hang out with a son. I hang out with Jesse Jesse waters on Fox
I'm gonna answer your question and the answer is yes, but it never happened and it never will but
Here's but the point that I'm making is I think we got to stop with the cancel culture
It's not about like where are you on this one individual?
It's more do you agree or disagree with the thing that the person said and the thing about it is that like when we play as if
The whole person can be reduced down to a single sound bite that you took out of context. You're not you're not dealing with real life
That's not how real life works. I love my wife deal dearly. Do I agree with her on everything? No
Do I agree with everything? I've always said no my opinions positions change
So the point that I'm making is is not about distancing from an individual. It's about saying
here's the thing I disagree with and also the attempt that they're using right now is to make
this entire campaign. Mike Rogers, who I'm running against, has nothing to say about anything. And so
his whole thing is, let me tie these two people together and then we'll try to push a cancel
war against the one to cancel the other. That's his whole campaign strategy. And here's the
thing about it. My campaign has never been about a streamer in California. He doesn't speak
for me. I don't speak for him. There are a lot of things he says that I deeply agree with.
People deserve healthcare. We shouldn't be fighting dumb wars. The war in Iran is ridiculous.
Donald Trump is a fascist. All true. There are things he said I disagree with. There
are things he said he now disagrees with. And so I just don't think about it as
the like, are you distancing yourself from a person, etc. The whole discourse is intended
to confuse and distract us from the actual issue. He never spoke for me. I don't speak
for him. He has his opinions. I have mine. There's a lot of them I agree with.
Some of them that I don't but the campaign for us is about getting money out of politics put money in your pocket passing Medicare for all
It's about what we can build together in Michigan and their attempting to distract us by taking us back to the cancel culture of the
2000s and trying to play that game again
And I'm just gonna say that remember the whole like Rogan discourse should have gone on Rogan
Yeah, do you know who was invited to campaign with Vice President Harris at the DNC a sump I
Who had said at that point all the things that they they're working to try and cancel more
So I'm against cancel culture and instead of playing the cancel culture gotcha game
I'm interested in parsing out the things people have said as they've said them and
Deciding whether I agree or disagree, but nobody speaks for me, but me right and I spoke to you
I agree with everything you said, but you know politicians
practice guilt by association all the time Democrats
Yeah, I think this is this was a a whopper of
of a narrative when the Republicans cynically deployed it to defend the
indefensible, but it was a successful one regardless, which is precisely the
reason why I think more people on the left should be deploying it when it's
defensible people who are being made out to be indefensible with quote-mining
clips out of context or even clips in context that come across as wild at first or vulgar
at first because I have plenty of that. And I will probably generate more of that in the
future as well because the format itself is so perfect for clips out of context, especially
because my fans, you guys have made compilations for years and years in a joking manner,
of which went viral back in the day. Nowadays, nowadays, those, those clues are being taken
sincerely.
Yeah, this is the joke that I saw earlier. Damson 23 is for we liberal Joe Rogan to
win back young men. Damson 23 is kill a Sompiger, even if it costs us Tennessee, kill him.
So here's the thing, will I have to restructure the way I do my commentary?
Am I more careful?
Absolutely.
I've been more careful since October 7, knowing full well what may happen, right?
Knowing full well what was going to happen.
If you recall, there were groups that straight up created a website called HamasAbi.com.
It had malware in it, it had a track or IP tracker on it, so don't even visit the website.
But that website had, that was obviously created on October 14th, 2023, okay?
October 7th, as in, these people saw October 7th happen and immediately went, how can
we use this against the song?
Number 14, 2023, they created a website called HamasAbi.com.
Many of the clips that you see, disseminated by the ADL, disseminated mainstream news,
many of those clips came from that community and came from that website.
And there are even more websites like that nowadays.
Okay?
You're pretty lead the voice of a movement, Taylor, your language is called being responsible.
Yes, but I have already tailored my language, is what I'm saying.
It is virtually impossible for any human being to operate in this contentious environment,
unless I, instead of tailoring my lives or unless I just change the format where I deliver this message
and stop streaming live on Twitch, stop using this platform as a vehicle for organizing in the
in the way that I have, and I'm not going to do that for the record, I'm not going to
do that, especially when this platform, this vehicle for change, has actually
bared fruit for the first time in the last 13 years of me doing stuff like this.
Even Fox News is clipping you.
Yeah.
This is not like a secret.
This is a common technique from the right.
This isn't a secret, but they're trying to create controversy around it, like Abdul is
running around claiming that he didn't do this.
There's nothing wrong with this.
That's the whole point.
Born fruit, not Baird fruit.
Sorry, born fruit.
The retaliation to this seems to be well Nick Fuentes, and then when you bring up how odious
a figure he is, they claim they're out of context too.
Yeah, Nick Fuentes is a self-identifying anti-Semite, a self-avowed anti-Semite.
If you can't make a distinction between someone like myself and Nick Fuentes, and you're
fucking idiot, you know, you're probably talking to an absolute moron.
One guy wants death, the other is the other guy wants Medicare for all, and it's just
terraced over and over.
How do you think it's better for us to argue against them?
How do we defend you better?
If you're talking to someone who turns around and goes, no, he's a, you're a terrorist, Nick
Fuentes is simply out of comics.
You're talking to a Nazi.
So you don't actually have to continue that conversation.
You understand that, right?
In any case,
that Republicans to the extremists on the right Republicans will now connect, you
know, you to contravoices on the left. What is the intellectually consistent
standard? I think if somebody's a political actor and you're associating
with that political actor, meaning it's not what they said, it's what they did,
then a, like you are signing on to that regime. So Mike Rogers, right, Donald
Trump is like immediately cancelable. Why? Not just what he's saying, what he
says is offensive enough. It's what he's doing. And so yeah, I think I think
I think taking Mike Rogers and being like, listen, Donald Trump is all that his stink
is all over you there.
I think when you're talking about somebody whose action is saying, parse them out by what
they say.
Joe Rogan's action is saying your action is saying Hassan Piker's action is saying these
are not people who are they have power by the platform, but they're not in a position
to have actual political power.
They don't control the levers.
They don't vote on things aside from their own individual vote.
But I think, yeah, like we're, we're delivering a higher standard to a Twitch streamer who
has never really had any political power whose movement, whose broader movement that he's
a part of has never really had any political power in this country.
And, and I'm supposed to sit here and everyone is supposed to sit here and be like, yeah,
that's the actual thing that we should be talking about a fucking Twitch streamer.
Let's say I'm an organizer.
I don't even, I don't even say that, right?
I don't, I don't claim to be an organizer.
I'm an advocate.
streamer, whatever. But even then, the idea that like, I am supposed to be, I am supposed to abide by
a higher standard than the fucking president, or even Mike Rogers himself, who was in Congress for
many years. Like, we're not supposed to parse through their legislative actions, and we're
supposed to hyper-focus on it. Which remember, you're an idiot, you're a delusional moron.
As far as affiliations goes, we're supposed to look at the affiliations of Abdul al-Sayed with a Twitch streamer,
but not look at the affiliation of Mike Rogers and Donald Trump.
It's crazy, but even stupid narratives can take root.
If it's repeated enough, repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth, and this is one of those moments.
Right?
I think the intellectually fair standard is to say, you need to parse those people out
based on the thing that is said, not the person, right?
And I think if you're talking about somebody who's in political power, it's a different
story.
I also think that you don't have to go and have a conversation with somebody and you
can say that the preponderance of the things that somebody says are off.
Take Nick Fuentes, for example.
The preponderance of the things that he has said is that he just hates people
who don't look like him.
you take a son and there are things that he said that I think were like not well
said there are things that he said that I just disagree with but I think if you
sat down with a son and you're like hey does this person hate certain groups of
people it's not what they're trying to turn them into be they're trying to
equate him and David Duke and him and Nick Fuentes and the fact that they're
working so hard to character assassinate him suggests that there is a
disjunct there between what he's actually saying and what people hear him
saying who actually pay attention if anybody starts to pick you apart
out of context it's never done a good faith. The funny thing is people use
nuance when it's people that they like. Hunter Biden can sit with Nick
Fuentes and say he likes Nick Fuentes and everybody's like well we still love
Hunter Biden you know me but let you do that. But isn't it the difference though
because he's running for a seat like Hunter Biden is just Biden's son.
I mean that's of course but also like. Yeah he's right.
Charlemagne is 100% right. There are a lot of liberties you get when
you're the son of the former president. There are a lot of liberties
you get when you're a white guy. Okay. And I say this is someone who's not like a hater,
Hunter Biden, as you guys know, I'm a lover of Hunter Biden, a defender of a voice that
has been by Hunter Biden's side. That's right. But let's be real, he does. I don't even think
he would disagree with that assessment. Yes, you, you get a little bit of, you get
There's no liberties
What can hunter Biden do to make decisions for people and if he's put in a seat he can make decisions for people so people want to make
It's not like it do
It's not what he can do
It's the fact that he has audience to influence and people want to make sure that
Your intentions don't align with his because of the things that they don't agree with that
He said and you said that there are some things you don't agree with also
But then there are some things that you feel like people misinterpret it. What do you think people misinterpret it?
I think so the you guys you guys speak on
on microphones for a good part of your day.
Whenever anybody tries to cut you out of context,
they're never doing it in good faith.
No. Ever.
And I, this guy streams for eight hours a day,
seven days a week.
You think there's not stuff he can say
that you could pull him out of context?
And so most of the time, you know,
when you give his, what he's saying, room to breathe,
right, and the fact that he has to fill up
eight hours of airspace, you're like, all right.
So what I'm hearing right now, the clip,
whatever the clip is,
going viral of him is usually being clipped out of context to say a particular thing and
it's usually being done specifically to smear somebody who's connected to him. And the funny
thing about me is that like, you know, I've been married to the same woman for 20 years.
Like the every attack that you give him on me is guilt by association is almost never
been like Abdul did Abdul said, I'm like, okay, so you're going to guilt by association
me into non existence. Let's see how that works for you. I just disagree with that
kind of politics. But to your point, you said something really important. And
I want to pick up on that the reason we go everywhere to talk to everybody is like you guys are a perfectly loving people
And I really enjoy the conversation
but it's also because there are a lot of people listening here and
As a practitioner of politics my job is to go and speak to those folks to say here's a pathway into our politics
That allows you to express a particular set of opinions through a leader that you might support, right?
That's what we're trying to do and represent a democracy in the first place and
And yeah, one of the interesting things I'll do also always is mention the start is
Like he talks to Republicans too
Right, like his job is to be in front of everybody and his job is to represent everybody, right?
So it's really funny he's like I'll go on Fox News. I'll go on a song stream. I'll do all of this, right?
and it's crazy that people just refuse to
to entertain this concept at all.
And it's so close to the argument that took place after 2024.
It's only been two years since the Democrats and the media
broadly had this debate.
And the side that I thought won this conversation was,
we got to be everywhere all at once.
We've got to be everywhere, we've got to talk to everybody, and we have to address their
concern.
So that's why it's so, that's why it's so funny to me that like now, Democrats just dropped
it immediately.
As they always do, they'll be like, we've got to stop being woke, quote unquote, woke.
And immediately, immediately when there's a left flank that they can dispose of, when
There's a left flank that they want to oppose.
They immediately bring it back.
I am reminded of Hillary Clinton's famous moment
of Medicare for All is not going to,
or breaking up the big banks is not gonna solve racism, right?
Was that the shameless line?
It's one of the best examples
of the hollowed out nature of like shallow id poll, right?
Shallow identity politics simply being,
uses a tool to oppose the left.
That was that when someone says woke 1.0
That's what I that is what I remember. Yeah, Matt. Leave also said it and called out Ari Drennan
This is why I'll never support Medicare for all in the US by the way
The NHS canceled all gender-affirming surgeries in Wales
This is what we mean when we say woke 1.0
That is woke 1.0. The argument that trans people would be under attack with any kind of nationalized healthcare system, it's totally ridiculous.
The argument that we oppose Medicare for All because we're protrains is an insane argument.
And it's an insane argument to to like the average person to the average result like that's that's psychotic
That's a psychotic thing that you just said
Yeah
Yeah, here it is Brianna who also doing it
This is why I no longer support Medicare for all Ari dren
This is why I'll never support Medicare for all in the US by the way Nick Frank and y'all want me to support Medicare for all
Yeah, no, I don't want to live in a constant fear every four years radical evangelicals will control all my health care decisions
Well, we don't have Medicare for all and trans people are still under attack.
So what kind of fucking argument is that?
Like we currently have a system of private health care.
Are trans people doing great currently in America?
Like two of the people that we're talking about are trans themselves by the way.
That's why it's insane.
saying argument to present. Yeah, if we broke up the big banks tomorrow, would that end racism?
That was the Hillary Rodham Clinton statement, right? And I think about that a lot. I think
about that a lot when I think about like woke 1.0 woke 2.0 whatever people want to talk about whatever
people are talking about like my my understanding of it is woke point 1.0 is just liberalism that's
it rad libs liberalism a defensive liberalism against socialism not even a defensive liberalism
against conservatism mind you because liberalism and conservatism are not at odds with one another
I'm talking about the political theory of liberalism. Corporate liberalism. That's what Woke 1.0 is.
Okay.
A defense of corporate liberalism, liberal capitalism,
against socialism and higher degrees of socialization.
performative wokeness that's why calling it woke is that a liberalism is flawed as a leftist no it's
good to it's it's good to lean into narratives to especially narratives that we started this
community is responsible for like 90% of that discourse before it became mainstream of the
The Woke 1.0, Woke 2.0 discourse, what are you talking about?
It's important to define certain things.
And yet, it is now a right-wing narrative.
The Woke 1.0 attacks have become a right-wing narrative.
It's a way to shy away from progressive values that you hold.
And I don't like that.
I don't like that either.
I don't think that's what it is.
i think that's what it should be
understand that that's not my intention it never was my intention and never will
be my intention i will always fight back against that
this ingenious framing
on the ground
from a manuals talking about me in the midterms
and that he and what he said the other day
i think i'm glad he said it
because it's out front
that somehow that we invited the violence against ourselves so to me we
We need to note he has just disavowed those comments that they were taking out of context.
My view, well how about his 9-11 comments?
Those comments are the ones I meant.
Yeah, okay, so my point is, we need to deal with this out front.
I'm not just going to condemn the rhetoric, put it out front.
75% of all religious hate crimes are directed at one religious faith in a country built
on religious freedom.
Any other group, appropriately, you are looking at a person, the first Jewish mayor
Chicago who held Ramadan dinners every year. When I was ambassador, I did it at the embassy
residence because that's how you build bonds of humanity. But everybody seems to get tongue
tied when it comes to anti-Semitism. And that to me is unacceptable.
Do you think that Jewish Americans are starting to feel not at home in the Democratic Party?
I think Jewish Americans, as I said in Israel and I'll say this, Jewish Americans
It's not about in the Democratic Party, given what Tucker Carlson is saying and given what
others are saying.
Well, you brought up what happened at the convention in Michigan and then the Democratic
State.
Yeah.
Well, I'm saying it's a larger issue.
Given what happened in Charlottesville, Virginia, and people chanting, Jews will not
replace us.
It's not a Democratic Party problem.
That's a convenient political, I know I'm on a political show, that's a convenient
political way of just kind of boxing it.
There is a larger threat when you have Governor Shapiro, whose house-
Don, you please.
Is Ramamannual comparing me to the Jews will not replace us guys on CNN?
That is so psychotic.
This is, you have Colorado, you have here in D.C. at the embassy.
How many more examples would you like me to give across the board?
So it's not a party problem.
This is a problem where you have 75%, according to the FBI, all religious-based violence is
based to 2% of the population.
And if you did...
Like Heather Hyer was an anti-fascist that died at Charlottesville.
Okay?
The left has always been in opposition to fascism and we still continue to oppose fascism.
We continue to oppose fascism no matter how costly it gets, and part of the reason why
we oppose Israel is because of our anti-fascist stance.
I genuinely think that this argument that Rahm Emanuel is presenting on CNN is not
reaching people, is not going to convince people.
The idea that this is a bipartisan issue that Democrats and the left also have a
significant problem with anti-Semitism as the right. This stuff is totally ridiculous.
I don't think Americans actually are in line with this argument.
In any case, this is now the second news program on CNN today that has mentioned my name
and refuses to have me on. Many people are asking the question. Why? We're telling
people when you try to cancel somebody that the people who listen to them are
not worth reaching out to. And I'd reject that on on its own terms. And then B,
what happens when you don't give people a pathway back into politics? Where do
they go. What do they do? If you believe in democracy, then democracy is about going and
talking to people and having a free exchange of conversation. Right? I got a lot of shit
for going on Fox News. People are like, why would you, why would you platform Fox News?
I'm like, I'm sorry. It's big. You already got a huge flat. Yes. They platform me. It
was great for you. Yeah. And the point that I'm maybe I'm misunderstood. You're saying
not to ever give it the wrong, but I think he was saying that a Democrat left issues
a Republican issue by pointing to Charlottesville. No, no, I think he was trying to say
that it's a this is an issue that transcends beyond partisan boundaries that's what he was saying
thinking is like look i'm gonna they're gonna disagree with me they're gonna try and pat me
the guy wanted to have a conversation about everything that was not gas groceries and health
care what do you think about transgenders in the wmv i'm sorry i don't think about it that
much it seems like you think about a lot but a core part of what you have to do um is get
voters. And that means you have to go everywhere to get voters, but I do want to get back to the
job you love to hate. I want to know the first bill you'd introduce. I have questions about
committees. Yeah, it's the Jonathan Shade argument. Yes. The first paragraph sounds a lot like the
argument you're accusing your enemies of making some forms of racism or more of a red line than
others. Democrats have little trouble understanding that the right wing infighting over Carlson
is about whether the Republican tent, which already includes racist, nativist,
and vicious Islamophobes, is also big enough to include anti-Semites. They have correspondingly
little trouble making harsh judgments about the moral compromises Republicans are contemplating in
the process. What many Democrats don't wish to admit is that they are entertaining a similar
choice themselves. Elsa, Adam, and Piker have professed their abhorrence of anti-Semitism,
but so has Vance, and so, for that matter, has Carlson. If your opposition to anti-Semitism
applies only to your ideological adversaries, and you excuse or ignore it from your allies,
It's an empty bromide. When Democrats dismiss the controversy over Piker and the movement he
stands for, they are treating the growing influence of left-wing anti-Semitism as
unworthy of concern, because it is unworthy of concern because it's fake. Okay, it's fake.
I will stay, I will say it. It is fake. It is the fakest, phonyest bullshit of all time.
time. The idea that there is a significant left-wing anti-Semitic movement growing in
this country is purely made up bullshit. Okay? Are there people who say that they're on the
left or are there people who are legitimately on the left who say anti-Semitism is not
a primary concern and we shouldn't be talking about it? Absolutely. There are. I'm not
one of those people. So if you think, and for the record, are those people large enough
to be a significant force? Do they have any political representation? No. Ironically enough,
many of those people on the left who say things like that are Jewish themselves. Again, utterly
irrelevant in the grand scheme of things, utterly immaterial in this conversation. Okay?
so we're clear. If you are presenting people like myself, people like Zoran Mamdani, people
like Abdul Al Sayed as representatives of left-wing antisemitism, then you're basically
shying away from saying the quiet part out loud, which is that your understanding of
quote-unquote, left-wing anti-Semitism is anti-Zionism.
Opposition to Israel is not opposition to Judaism or Jews.
Okay?
Opposition to Israel is moral and just.
Opposition to Jews, anti-Semitism, is immoral and unjust.
It is utterly unacceptable, and we don't do it.
It's that simple.
So this conversation is the same exact one
that Zionists have tried to present and have presented successfully
for many, many years.
Unfortunately, given that Israel's popularity is waning,
Israel has become a pariah state for very good reasons.
Genocide, apartheid occupation, these are very
normal reasons to oppose the state of Israel
and the underlying ideology
that has allowed this kind of violence to take place, that has motivated this
kind of violence to take place. To present that opposition as entirely anti-semitic is
a dangerous bargain. In the words of Ezra Klein, if you keep telling people to oppose
Israel is to be anti-semitic, eventually they will believe you. Ironically enough, I said
something along those lines as well, which is what started this last round of media.
last round of media frenzy.
Can you delineate between your anti-zynism and anti-zynism as the Jews rule the world
anti-semitic trope?
You are a bit of a firebrand.
I've seen TV prints where you get flustered and start bombarding your opponents with insults.
Even the obduse of capitalists.
I still love me some obdue.
Wait what?
Can you delineate between your anti-zynism and anti-zynism as Jews rule the world
anti-Semitic trope. Yes, it's very simple. Okay, my opposition, my opposition to Zionism
is an ideological opposition because Zionism is a fascist ideology. Okay,
my opposition to Zionism is what Zionism has created, which is death and destruction to
the indigenous inhabitants of the land formerly known as Palestine. Okay, and also me getting
flustered and bombarding my opposition with my opponents with insults are some of the best
moments, some of the most viral moments on the Piers Morgan show. That's what you're responding to,
right? There's only so much direct idiocy that I can contend with before I have to deliver a similar energy.
Anti-Zionism as the Jews rule the world anti-Semitic trope is not anti-Zionism, it's anti-Semitism.
You actually did something that is very disingenuous here.
There is no anti-Zionism that is Jews rule the world.
That's just anti-Semitism.
You substituted anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism and demanded that I address it.
Okay?
No, why is he reading me, yes.
There has been a pleasant byproduct of this mere cycle.
A lot of these fake progressives supposedly Israel critical potential 2028 candidates are
showing their ass and McMoring themselves early. Now, everyone knows when they talk about progressive
issues in Israel, they're full of shit, also, Ron Booker, he is such a showing. Well, many
of those people are, I don't even think they're trying to present themselves as progressive.
I demand you undress me.
Little Kate.
Here's the thing.
If I wasn't effective at converting people to anti-Zionism to see the truth
about Israel, I wouldn't be getting this many attacks.
Okay.
It's that simple.
That's it. Sometimes, sometimes it is that easy to understand. This is one of those times.
If I was ineffective as a communicator on this issue, then no one would be spending, taking
time out of the day to attack me. And I hope people understand that, okay?
Anyway, when Democrats dismiss the controversy over Piker and the movement he stands for,
they are treating the growing influence of left-wing anti-Semezons unworthy of concern
or worse still, or worse still, a fate at complete.
The Democrats imploring outside the renounced Piker want more than a generalized promise
to safeguard Jewish safety or a statement that nobody speaks for the candidate.
They're seeking some assurance from outside that he will speak out in opposition to
attacks against Jews by his own supporters.
Now, what they want from Abdel El Sayed ultimately is to say that he won't oppose funding to
Israel, but they will take a disciplining operation as a secondary price.
Some will, some will, not all.
Some will be happy if they can get a second place prize of, you know, we embarrassed Abdel
all say it, and we embarrassed his association with the Psalm Piker. We
embarrassed the Psalm Piker who is a prominent critic of Israel. So we'll take
that. And he's not conceding thus far on even the second place prize. He's
certainly not going to concede on the first place prize, which is for him to
be supportive of Israel, of course, instead of, you know, being in opposition
to Israel. And for the record, Abdullah also understands that many of these
people do not even want the second place prize as well.
Many of these people actually simply want him to lose because of his daring statements
on Israel from the start, okay?
You're talking of yourself in the third person?
I know, dude, because I'm the fucking subject of the intense media scrutiny and intense
media debate.
It feels weird.
I don't know how to deal with it.
I don't know how to talk about it.
Sometimes I do refer to myself in the third person.
I know.
No, why is he reading my understand, but do you think that's why cable news won't have
you on?
No, cable, do you think I know more than you do about why cable news won't have me on?
Do you feel like I have sufficient contacts at these news networks, including CNN, MS
now and many others do you think I might know a little bit more than you do on this and I'm
just simply not telling you the you know the full story but it but trying to help you trying
to lead the horse of water here trying to help you understand what it is no it's a fucking
blacklist. It's just very simple just apply a little bit of logic. These guys have literally
These guys, here's two things that you need to understand.
One, having me on Jake Tapper or Dana Bash would be a ratings boon, okay?
It would be good for ratings and television executives love ratings more than anything.
But there's only one exception to their love and desire for ratings, especially
considering that journalists and commentators, prominent reporters, prominent
commentators have had everyone on, especially when they are the subject of intense scrutiny
and debate. They will have anyone and everyone on to interrogate their views, right? They'll
have R. Kelly on. In the process of R. Kelly's court case, they had Max Miller on to yell
at Max Miller for good reason. Have I done anything as bad as R. Kelly or Max Miller?
Well, if you're Jake Tapper, the answer is yes, Jake Tapper thinks that my anti-Zionist commentary is far worse than Max Miller's alleged crimes against his wife and his two-year-old daughter.
Okay?
I'm not demanding that Jake Tapper have me on on CNN and then agree with me
We can have you know regular productive discourse a real back-and-forth on these issues to parse through what my beliefs are
These are people who gladly have Benjamin Ninyahu on.
Am I worse than Benjamin Netanyahu?
Am I a bigger threat than Benjamin Netanyahu?
If you were to make that argument sincerely, everyone would laugh at you.
Even supporters of Israel would laugh at you.
The reason why Fox News won't have me on even if I'm such a easily dismissible figure
is the same reason why Dana Bash and Jake Tapper, CNN and MS now, don't want to have
me on because they understand that if I were to go on these outlets, I would come across
as a far more agreeable person than the way that they want to depict me.
It would destroy the last month or the last six months of commentary, propping me up first
as a figurehead for the DSA and then also utilizing a barrage of clips.
It would entirely undermine the Republican midterm strategy.
And yes, of course it's been confirmed.
Wasampagatel said before he might have been blacklisted from appearing on CNN MSNOW, let's
just say this isn't speculation.
And I'm not alone.
There are plenty, there are plenty of media figures that don't get invited back on these
shows even if they were initially prominent anchors on these platforms.
that's it. Because if I were to go on Scott Hannity's show, for example, if I were to
go on Jesse Waters' show, that conversation would be a contentious one, but it would be
a difficult one to hold because ultimately it would be a difficult one to hold for the Republican side
because ultimately they would look silly. And the same goes for Dana Bash or Jake Tapper. You
think Dana Bash and Jake Tapper have the capacity to have a one-on-one conversation with someone
like myself where they look good on the issue of Israel in defense of Israel? Do you think
that conversation would look great for them? No, they understand that it would look horrible
for them, which is why they won't do it. It's much easier to just routinely smear, slander,
besmirch, claim that I'm this like dangerous toxic anti-Semite. This radical terrorist lean
into Islamophobia coming from the right in an effort to justify and legitimize this narrative,
have a million different guests on, to have endless back and forth about who I am, what
I represent over and over again, sometimes even lean into allies who are never going
to be able to put up a sufficient defense of me, whether it be FaZe or even Bernie Sanders,
to continue the fear mongering operation.
I'm also anti-Israel, but when you start taking, when you start talking about other Congress people being beholden to Israel via APEC and other lobbies,
this are sounding like your worldview of Zionism is equivalent to the trope.
Chatter.
Israel and APEC in many respects, or Israel is a foreign country, is still a foreign country,
but APEC is no different than when I talk about the big pharma lobby,
or when I talk about the gun lobby, the NRA, or when I talk about, because NRA is more partisan,
when I talk about the healthcare lobby, okay? What kind of trope are we talking about when I say
a lot of these Democratic Party politicians are terrified of pushing for Medicare for all?
I know you're clip farming, by the way. I know this is not a sincere concern.
You're just trying to get me to say something or even read out your comment out loud so you can fucking
Try to get a clip off with just my face reading your comment to say this is what this guy is about look see let's continue the cycle
I know what you're doing we know what you're doing chatter
Nobody says it's a dangerous trope when we talk about healthcare profiteers dominating
discourse, having all their consultants and lobbyists appear on news outlets to defend
how why health care must remain privatized. Nobody talks about the attacks against people
who are pro-medicare for all as a dangerous trope.
Okay? Israel is a satellite for American imperialism. And this is precisely the reason
why its lobby has been allowed to operate in the United States of America without much
restriction.
If Israel wasn't the most reliable Cold War ally in perpetuity, a satellite, an imperial
outpost that is a permanent destabilizing factor in the Middle East, a resource-rich
region, it would not have been allowed to operate on US soil in the ways that it has.
ever the U.S. has liberty and all the spying? No, that is an allowance that America has given
this for an ally. An allowance that is given this for an ally because they make the calculation
that even if they engage in these sorts of actions, they're still ultimately very reliable.
The most reliable. That's also the same reason why Israel is still being heavily
defended in the media, even though Israel is directly responsible for this current Iran
quagmire that we found ourselves in. And in some respects, you might even say,
a lot of these boomers don't know any other reality. They have no way, they have no
Middle Eastern men in policy without Israel. So they can't imagine a world where Israel is
anything but the most reliable ally. They've never known a world where, you know, they've
never known a world where that didn't exist.
McGurg is the zealot of the 21st century U.S. foreign policy catastrophes like all neocons,
No shame or apologies over the wreckage he's left behind, just more ra-ra-drivel.
Yeah, Brett McGurk's still pushing, new analysis on CNN, no, Iran is not winning.
In Act 4 of the war, it's losing his leverage in the hormones, oh my god.
Trump, this is a relatively little war for us.
This is not a big war.
You know where the money went as Ukraine?
The money was really taken out, the ammunition.
If you talk about low, we have tremendous amounts, unlimited amounts of mid-grade and
older stuff that's also very powerful.
They say we used it in Iran.
We used very little in Iran by comparison.
Joe Biden gave Ukraine over $300 billion worth of stuff.
I love this argument because the implication is we are not losing but winning in Iran,
But also, we are actually losing it around because of Ukraine and Joe Biden.
Interesting.
It doesn't make sense.
But Trump rarely ever does.
But because this issue is, once again, a uniparty issue, support for Israel, American foreign
policy, it's uniparty, nobody ever fucking turns around and goes, when are we putting
an end to this. Actually, that's not true. A lot of people are actually screaming about
the Iran stuff, almost with the same intensity as they scream about, you know, my position
as a prominent critic of Israel.
Yeah, we're winning.
But if we were losing, which we're not, but if we were losing, it's because of Biden.
Incredible take.
CBS, every dovetail today about 9-11.
We noticed that there were some resurface votes on 9-11.
And I was wondering if it's making it challenging to reach more Republican or more moderate
voters in this race?
Well, I mean, I think all of us look back and say 9-11 is an awful thing to happen
in this country.
And I think all of us also look back and say, think about all the wars that were
thought and how much safer do we feel like they made us? How many lives did they ruin it?
And my point is just to say that what happened on 9-11 is a disaster. It was a terrible
attack on our country. And our responsibility is also to think about how do we build an
America where we are protecting our service and our women from being asked to fight
We have no business fighters that ultimately end up doing harm to people and we're saying
that right now.
And we look at the consequences of this war that we have no business fighter, the billions
of dollars that are being spent to raise our gas prices, and we're in a five-mile we don't
know how to get out of and you'd think that after the disasters in Afghanistan and Iraq
that we would have learned a lesson but apparently not.
And so I just think it's really important for us.
line, by the way, the whole 9-11 was a horrifying tragedy, and what we did afterwards was also
horrifying and a tragedy. It was consequential both for Americans and the victims as well,
and you would assume 25 years after the fact that we would have learned a valuable lesson
not to do that, and yet we're still repeatedly doing it, which is meddling in the affairs of
the Middle East and consistently murdering people, asking a Jew who openly supports Israel,
why they support Israel as anti-Semitic, but asking a random Muslim about 9-11, isn't Islamophobic?
No, of course it is Islamophobic. Of course, everyone understands it's fucking Islamophobic.
They just, they're doing it for that reason. If it wasn't Islamophobic, they probably
want to do it. Let's be real. There's no such thing as blowback. Hurt people do not hurt
people. History started on October 7th. History started on September 11th. We need to deport
Arun Dati Roy. There was a really good tweet about this that I saw that I feel like I'm
I'm gonna be deploying in the future.
It's now in my arsenal.
It's explaining to a liberal what the cost of the blowback
is like explaining the theory of evolution
to a creationist.
They just don't wanna hear it.
They're like, nothing you say is penetrating
my consciousness right now, okay?
Nothing you say is going in,
in through one ear, out through the other.
La, la, la, la, I can't hear you.
I've never been able to hear you.
How dare you say such a simple concept?
No, our actions could never provoke reaction.
Our violent actions could never provoke violent reaction.
How dare you?
Our enemies are barbaric.
When we do the violence to them, of course,
we are doing it to tame the barbarians.
And then the vicious barbarians never understand.
The vicious barbarians never understand
that we're simply trying to tame them through our violence.
Our violence is good.
Their violence bad.
Our violence is not, uh, supposed to, to, uh, create any kind of reaction.
Our bloodlust, our bloodlust is good.
It's ultimately for good purpose.
Mike Rogers is so racist.
All in four trucks are racist.
He thinks his home of Egypt is beautiful, but our great Mackinac Island, he hates it.
All in four trucks are raised.
Such a nasty little pervert.
Nasty little freak.
Yeah, here's the tweet.
Less than 24 hours old and I can see it.
I can see this tweet is going to live forever.
Explaining blowback to a liberal is like explaining evolution to a creationist.
A lot of the outrage is you doing an alzory treat America's adversaries if they're human
beings that are responding to material realities that to them is the same as saying terrorism
is good.
Yes.
Exactly.
No, that's that's exactly what it is.
I also openly reflect on our actions as bringing about terror as well because if
If we're going to utilize the vague term terrorism, then, you know, we have to utilize it on ourselves
as well when we conduct it, because it is still terror to the victims, okay?
We are terrorizing those people.
We are terrorizing these people endlessly.
What is it, but not an act of terror when we triple tap Minnab, the school for little
girls?
We hit it once, and then we hit it twice, and then we hit it a third, uh, we hit it a third
time.
Is that not an act of terror for their families?
We killed these children.
Is that not terrorism?
People freak out about this kind of stuff, or they're like, how dare you say this?
It's ridiculous.
For a brief session, a brief stretch in the nineties, Israeli media ran the outreach
platform of people like Libowitz, Gideon Levy, and even the occasional passing of Intellectual,
only to scold them for insufficient Zionist spirit, completely unthinkable today.
Yeshe Yahoo, Libowitz was right.
I'm not going to watch that too much, I'm going to be learning the lessons of our history.
And I'm talking to Michigan every single day, he wonder when the era of all these wars
is going to end.
Because that's what Donald Trump said he was going to do, he said America first.
I'm America first.
There's not a day that goes by that I don't think about the destruction that 9-11
and also think about how do we build in America where we're not constantly
fighting wars we're in the business to fight. Both of those things are different.
Yeah, the difference between the liberals and the conservative fascists is that
liberals deny US atrocities and fascist Republicans say it was good that we did
the atrocities. Okay, one side recognizes them and says it's good, the
The other side doesn't recognize them at all, and yells at anyone who does.
Jesse Arm.
What neither Piker Abdullah said nor his top campaign surrogate to Sampiker understand is
that there are no relevant context in explaining why jihadists from Dearborn Heights via Lebanon
attempt to murder 140 preschoolers in West Bloomfield is some form of cosmic retribution
the grievance over conflict thousands of miles away. Most Michigan voters outside the campus
and campus in Ann Arbor. And the most radical Moss and Dearborn have no appetite for that
third world is logic. I'll do I'll say it wants to represent Palestine. Mike Rogers wants to
represent Michigan. Vice president of external affairs at Manhattan Institute says this.
Once again, it is a demand for thought termination, right? It's intellectual
in curiosity, it's a way to say, no, I don't want to even hear any explanation whatsoever
about what motivates people to do heinous acts that are condemnable, okay, that have been
condemned over and over again.
This is the Abdul El Sayyed Apologizes segment, by the way.
Abdul also had apologized for saying hurt people hurt people if you recall after the the temple attack
Abdul immediately came out and and
Disavowed it and and condemned it
And then
Uh, I think uh a couple like a week later a couple days later
He uh turned around and said
We also have to understand and interpret like why violent incidents,
condemnable incidents like this take place and it is a cycle of violence that we must break.
Something along the lines of it is a violent cycle that we must break.
At which point he also said, her people hurt people.
The point still remains. The point still stands.
He was not incorrect in this assessment.
Okay? He was right. But, much like what they do to me, they did to him. They chopped the clip down. They brought it down to its bare bones.
And although he was saying something even without context, that was totally understandable, he was saying it while being Muslim.
He was saying it while also being an opposition to Israel and therefore
It was used to endlessly smear him and attack him and say that he wasn't sufficiently
Sad
About the the attack that took place
My dad was worked on Wall Street for his entire life and is very sparsely political involved. Just ask me who is on piker is what the fuck's going on?
Yes, that what's going on is is an endless immediate smear campaign.
What is this, Jonathan Martin?
I do know anything that makes a race about him rather than Trump's a mistake and using
asshole shines the light back on him.
The folks who feel likewise are going to vote, yeah, that's the point, wait, what?
Jonathan Martin, a non-0% chance Schumer and his or his super PAC ask Obdol to say to
spend the rest of the cycle in deep Mackinac Woods at the Lodge Grand has while they
handle messaging.
Why?
Because of this.
Michiganers have been struck by yet another disastrous Trump policy. The
expansion of a trade war with Canada. Now we're here in Michigan, we all know
Canadians. Canadians are like the only people in the world who are going to
preemptively apologize for something they didn't even do. So if you're
starting a trade war with Canada is because you're the asshole. And here we
We are with Mike Rogers.
He has no choice but to rubber stamp, to Roger, a trade war that is now costing the Michiganders
that he says he wants to serve nearly $6,000 a year for the goods and services we did
not have to worry about.
Now, to what end?
There's a smart use of tariffs.
This ain't it.
This is a vanity war.
Don't want to be clear this vanity war is not a war with Canada
It's a war on Michigan
Because we have to pay the price and we pray it every single day for goods
That should not cost as much as they do
So Jonathan Martin senior political calm calmness at Politico heard this message and went oh, he's calling Trump an asshole
I'm pretty sure Chuck Schumer is gonna tell him to shut the fuck up
Adam Carlson responded with, I don't know, I think calling the guy with a net minus 23 net favorability rating and a
48% very unfavorable rating and asshole with respect to escalating an already super unpopular trade war with a crucial trading partner for the
state emits already high inflation is pretty solid messaging
Especially when it shifts the focus away from a certain online personality from California. Okay, Adam. Shut the fuck up. Jesus Christ
He's not wrong though. Anyway
To which Jonathan Martin replied with I do know anything that makes the race about him rather than Trump is a mistake and using
Asshole shines a light back at him. That's the point. I guess it needed spelling out
Adam Grozner said are you really clutching your pearls because he's swear to cuss in the year 2026?
And the answer is yes
But the reason why they're doing it the reason why Jonathan Martin is doing this is because he just fucking hates Abdul
So, anything they can, anything they can do to be like, well, you know, Abdul, I want to like the guy, but he's
sweared, he called Trump an asshole.
Ridiculous.
The Grasp in his straws, which once again speaks to the quality of the candidate.
I will repeat this over and over again.
Abdul is such a fantastic candidate that they have to, they can't attack him.
So they have to attack me.
Abdul is such a high quality candidate, well credentialed, great fighter,
meeting the moment so perfectly as a candidate that they have to engage
in pearl clutching.
Okay.
This is why I am confident that Abdul will win.
is why I'm confident that he'll win.
Can I get to.
It is that simple, folks.
Now, they try to do the same clips out of context and the smearing of Abdul directly as well.
You know, they do that regardless.
So, for the longest time, I at least thought, you know, it's good that they're hitting
me because every moment that they're hitting me, they're not hitting him.
You were confident with him against Stevens, but he barely pulled through.
more confident this time? Yes. The reason why I'm even more confident this time around
than before is because the entire Democratic Party, for the most part, is backing. It is
This is also because he won in spite of the $74 million of attacks that makes me even
more confident against Mike Roger in a plus seven national environment.
Anyway, let's do Fox News is Vice President J.D. Vance, Abdul said apologize for synagogue
attack comments.
Does anyone have the original statement that he made where he said hurt people hurt people
by the way because I want to go through the full quote to show you how idiotic it is and
to explain to you that this is literally another one of these like Hassan said Jews should
be under attack moment, but for Abdul directly now.
Thank you for your time.
Abdul El Sayed is working to clean up his mess.
The Democrat trying to distance himself
from anti-Israel streamer Hassan Piker
and explain some insensitive comments
that El Sayed himself made
following a synagogue attack in his state.
Watch.
To anybody who feels like my comments might have been hurtful,
I'm really sorry that was not my intention.
We condemned that terrorist attack.
We condemned it outright.
What I was trying to do was offer context
for why it happened,
but it wasn't the time for context
you don't ever want to trample somebody's pain.
We're in the state of Michigan.
If you want to make this race about a streamer in California,
I just think you're missing the vote.
This is about affordability in Michigan.
This is about being able to see a doctor in Michigan.
This is about Donald Trump's disastrous policies
in Michigan.
That's what I'm focused on right now.
The co-chair of the Republican National Committee,
Casey Crosby joins me now.
Casey, great to have you back on the program.
Shouldn't Michigan voters buy that apology?
Not one bit.
I mean, this was just in March where he is.
not one bit. After all, his name is Abdul.
It's a nationalizing an attack on a synagogue and it's okay here you want to read
Video, Abdul said, reflects on Temple Israel Tech.
Following yesterday's Temple Israel in West Bloomfield, US, and Canada, Abdul said, released
a video statement.
Abdul first issued a statement yesterday.
Let's do the first statement.
So this was as soon as it happened.
Okay.
I was horrified and heartbroken this afternoon to hear the reports of an active shooter
at Temple Israel in West Bloomfield.
I'm thankful that no worshiper students or teachers were harmed.
We all owe a debt of gratitude to temple security and law enforcement who act swiftly
to keep the community safe.
To my Jewish sisters and brothers, you have a right to worship in peace.
You have a right to send your kids to the synagogue in the morning and know they'll come
home safely at night.
And you have a right to know that your religious identity and faith practice are respected.
There is no room for anti-Semitism in America, so today and every day I am standing in
solidarity with all of us who value our right to pray and how we choose to pray
against anti-Semitism in all of its forms.
he released this video statement. It's four minutes long. It was a reaction to the temple
attack in Israel. And this is the transcript of some of the highlights.
Our state was rocked by news of a heinous attack on temple Israel, a synagogue in Musbloom
Field, Michigan. An armed assailant drove his truck into the building where there
are 140 children. Because of the heroism of temple security and law enforcement,
The assailant was disarmed and ultimately killed.
No teachers, children, or congregants were physically harmed.
I'm so relieved.
I grew up not 15 minutes away from Temple Israel.
Many of my childhood friends and classmates worshipped there.
I shudder to think through the emotions of the parents whose children were in the synagogue.
This attack will leave scars on the inside and will stay with the community for decades.
These scars will echo centuries of trauma on the part of the Jewish people, calling
back the memories of atrocities, including the Holocaust, against Jewish people that are
torn afresh every time something like this happens. To my Jewish sisters and brothers,
I want to reaffirm my commitment to your rights to worship, to learn, to practice, and to
celebrate your faith.
Dude, I want to repeat this one more time. This is the statement where they got the
hurt people hurt people from.
Semitism has no place in our communities, ever full stop.
Yesterday, we also learned that the attacker was a man was Ali.
He was Arab American and Muslim.
I condemn what he did.
There is never a justification for attacking innocent people
or houses of worship.
Never as an epidemiologist.
I've spent my career studying the worst things that happened
to people to understand how to stop them from happening.
And I'll never forget one of the simplest lessons I learned while on my psychiatry rotation
in medical school.
Hurt people hurt people.
Violence is a cycle.
Amen Huzali lost family, including two children in an airstrike in Lebanon last week.
They were innocent people.
And then in an evil act of displaced rage, he tried to take it out on innocent children
who had nothing to do with the loss of the innocent children he lost, except that
they share of faith.
Temple Israel is not the state of Israel.
Jewish people are not the state of Israel, and the people of Israel are not the political
actors who make direct choices for the state of Israel.
We cannot and must not conflate these and act rooted in anti-Semitism.
One can have righteous anger at the actions of the state of Israel while expressing solidarity
with the Jewish people, including Jewish people in Israel.
The conflation of these, whether in the dastardly way Amin Hazadi did, or in an
effort to use the specter of anti-Semitism.
This is where the statement comes from?
Yes.
I need you all to understand, this is what he is apologizing for, this 4 minute, unbelievably
thoughtful video.
To defend the indefensible, it sits at the root of our failure to stop this violence.
Aiman Hazadi hurt people.
There is no justification for what he did.
It was wrong and he never should have done it.
Hurt people hurt people.
A week earlier, an airstrike killed his niece and nephew.
Imagine if that had never happened.
Imagine there was no war in Iran.
Imagine if there were no airstrikes in Lebanon.
Imagine if his family had never died.
Imagine there was never an attack on Temple Israel.
That's the world that we want to live in.
That's the world we need to build for.
Violence always bigots violence.
Only peace can extinguish that.
Because hurt people hurt people.
In the coming weeks, a narrative is going to take hold.
It will be shaped in part by the very people who launched that war that led to those
air strikes that killed those children that drove this crazed attacker to violence against
innocent people at a synagogue in Michigan. They'll tell us that some people are inherently
evil. They'll tell us that the system of immigration that allowed him to come here should be dismantled,
and they'll use it all to justify the war that created this in the first place. When
the powerful pit us against each other, we all lose. When the powerful start wars,
we can't know what the consequences will be. When we fail to ask why, we miss the
opportunity to address the cycle of violence in the first place.
So what now?
We ought to grieve for the internal scars that the children of Temple Israel and their parents
and families will carry with them for decades.
We ought to grieve for the children who are dying at the hands of airstrikes.
We ought to grieve for the communities being told that we are powerless to show up for
one another's pain, and we ought to grieve for a world that so quickly forgets to
grieve.
And then, in our grief, we ought to do the thing that Aiman Razadi was too
too small to do. Rather than allow ourselves to be plunged deeper into the cycle of violence,
we ought to commit ourselves to work to ending it. We can and must condemn the attack on
Temple Israel, and we can and must condemn the violence 6,000 miles away, and we can
and must condemn the broken politics that allows leaders to make war that they pretend
has no consequences. Violence never ends violence, it only perpetuates it. May we
have the foresight, the courage, and the strength to stand in the breach.
Am I incorrect in thinking it was a bad idea to apologize for this? No, he's just trying to dog. He has to have more information than we do about how the Jewish Michiganders have reflected on the barrage of anti-obdual commentary, part of it revolving around the way that they clipped it.
He has two options here to constantly defend his contacts, to constantly fucking say, guys, go watch the video, go watch the formative video, it's not that long.
My statement in and of itself is not bad at all. Or he just goes, I'm sorry. I'm sorry for the timing and the contextualization.
Okay, I'm sorry for the timing and the contextualization, which is precisely what he did.
He apologized not for the statement and of himself, but for adding that on.
Here is his apology.
Let's take a look.
This is at the Michigan Jewish Democrats Conference.
Temple of Zero was attacked for children in that temple.
As a parent who desperately wants my children to be safe in their place of worship, I could
not imagine how horrific and horrified parents in the broader community were.
I've been in Temple of Zero.
I did, our embotments was there,
it was 15 minutes away from there.
And I did not appreciate that in the attempt
to offer broader context,
I was trampling the dignity that that fear
and that pain should have been for it.
And I could imagine that for a lot of folks
that would have read like,
he does not see our pain or weigh it equally.
And that was not my intention of the statement.
And if my statement caused pain, I'm sorry.
That was not what I intended to do.
And sometimes you can offer context or something, but not in the moment when people are feeling
any pain.
And, you know, I made a mistake.
I should have, I know we issued a statement, of course, condemning it, and it just
shouldn't be the full stop.
And in the fullness of time, I hope that we can have conversations that are about
context. But sometimes you can't really see context in the moment of a kill in Europe.
And so the intention for me was not to trample that pain. It was not to discount it. It was
not at all to justify any sort of domestic terrorism. That's wrong, full stop. And so
insofar as people interpreted that way, I'm sorry it was not my intention. And I want
folks to know that when the Jewish community is attacked, I'm going to be right there
to defend it.
the Republican candidate for governor brought you up in the first second of this interview
stunning the CBS anchor.
Yeah, because her girlfriend fucking hates me as John James, dude.
That's the least surprising event of all time.
So, do I believe Abdul al-Sayed should have done this?
Or do I believe rather that Abdul was in the wrong in any way, shape, or form he wasn't?
It's his decision to make.
He believes that it's an easier way to tackle the issue and sometimes concede to oppositional
framing.
I am not an advocate for such things, but sometimes it's easier to just exercise humility,
even if there is no reason to do so, even if you haven't said anything wrong, instead
of hoping that people understand where you're coming from.
Why do I say this?
Abdul El Sayed is a brown man. His name is Abdul Rahman Muhammad El Sayed. He's Muslim.
So for that reason, as I've said over and over again, sometimes you have to seed ground,
even if you're correct.
Sometimes you apologize, even if you're in the right,
because you want to mend bridges once again.
It sucks.
But such is the nature of life,
especially when you're running in a contentious race.
Now, will it work is another question.
I think it will.
I think that there are a lot of older Jewish voters in Oakland County, in Michigan broadly,
100,000 Jewish people living in Michigan is approximately 400,000 Arabs.
Abdul-Azid needs those votes.
He would be a fantastic candidate for every single person.
Jewish Muslim Christian doesn't matter. He is the best candidate for Michiganders.
I know that to be true, but if one particular community doesn't feel that way,
you have to make inroads with them.
It's no different than Abdel Ossad dancing in Taylor Swift,
partially because he enjoys Taylor Swift, but also partially because he has to show himself as not the scary Muslim.
Zoran does it all the time. Sometimes it's wrong. Sometimes what Zoran does is questionable.
In some instances, I think it's outright cowardly. But I have also given Zoran a lot more liberties
because of his background, because I understand that he has to present himself against 25 years
of Islamophobic racialized agitative propaganda.
You understand?
It's longer than 25 years, but especially in the past 25.
And a few months later, apologizing for it.
I mean, he's only doing this for one reason
and that's for votes.
He knows he's in trouble and he needs the votes.
And in fact, his biggest campaign surrogate
is anti-Jew communist who said America deserves 9-11.
I don't think Michigan voters are gonna fall for this BS.
Here's President Trump talking to Trey Gowdy
last night about El Sayed.
Watch.
I think we're gonna do very well
because we have communists.
have a party that's been infiltrated by bad thought, by bad policy. I used to talk about
socialism, but this is in socialism. This is largely communism. I look at the people running
like in Michigan. This man is out of it. This is very dangerous for our country.
I'm not saying good guy, bad guy. I'm just saying this is big, big.
I've never seen from so high def, bro, and I'm gonna be honest, I never want to see him
this high def ever again, throws trouble for our country.
But yet KC Republicans are trailing in eight of the major battleground Senate races, including
in Michigan, just two months out from election day that according to the real clear politics
aggregate of polling.
So is the president's warning there just not getting through to voters?
Now, I'm on the ground traveling the country, and they're getting the message loud and clear.
And listen, the more these people talk, the more people realize that they are lying about
their policy.
I mean, what we see right now is the left cow tailing to the socialist arm of their
party.
They are dysfunctional.
They are a complete disaster.
All you have to do is get online and look at their platform.
They want to abolish the police.
They want to get rid of prisons.
They want to get rid of the Supreme Court.
They want to get rid of the Senate.
They are against everything, except for increasing your taxes
and having to have corporations own private businesses.
I mean, their platform is insane.
People need to really educate themselves
on what we are fighting going into this midterm election.
OK, but KC, that said, are you
worried about states like Alaska, like Texas?
Which, I mean, let's face it, you kind of just
expect those to be red.
and the polling showing they're pretty close,
if not having the Democrat in the lead right now.
Yeah, we're in a midterm election
and we know what history tells us,
but we also know that we have the greatest messenger
and President Trump.
We are going to be going into these midterm elections.
Next week, we're heading to Dallas.
We're gonna be talking about how united our party is
and we're gonna talk about the results
of President Trump's first two years in office
and where we're gonna go over the next two years.
And so we are a unified party,
but yeah, we know we have a battle in our hands,
But we also know where we need to put them.
fight this battle and we have the resources necessary to go out and be on the offense with
the Democrats.
Casey Crosby, Republican National Committee Co-Chair, you've got a busy two months ahead
of you.
Thanks for getting up early with us here the last day of August.
We appreciate it.
Be sure to like and subscribe for all the Fox News latest on YouTube and catch full
shows streaming now on Fox One.
It's kind of a weird apology, he was offering context but he doesn't want to give context.
His opponent, Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers joins us now.
Do you accept his apology?
When someone says, you might have been offended by what I said, that's not an apology.
He has a long history, Brian, of anti-Semitic comments, inflammatory comments, he's angry,
he's aggressive.
And, you know, there's a time in politics when who you are is very different than who
you want people to think you are.
And so the polling said, hey, you needed to change this, mainly because we've had so
many Democrat Jewish people here in the state of Michigan ring up our phones, say, I can't
do this, I'm for you.
We've had big events.
That group is swelling by the day.
So that was his sad attempt, I think, to try to stem that bleeding.
But listen, you are who you are.
And we have, I mean, this guy is so thick with that angry rhetoric about anti-Semitism
and it is causing real problems around the state.
We talked to a Jewish woman the other day, Brian, a university of Michigan who has to
hide her star of David because she's afraid to walk to class because of the aggressive
behavior toward her because she's Jewish.
We've got to stop this.
duelists too extreme for this state and we're going to beat them in November.
Hey, you got the Michigan AG who is Jewish, skip the state democratic convention, saying
she did not feel.
I'm going to keep it above 50.
Given the American reactionary tendency, I don't think this is a good narrative for
electoral chances.
I think Americans don't like any inference of woke and I don't think they, I don't think Americans buy in large care about any form of bigotry including anti-Semitism.
Mike, I've said this before, I think it's not, I don't think this is a thing that is
going to work for many Americans, I think they're just going to be like, why should
I care about this?
I'm not saying this is a good thing, obviously I've opposed bigotry my whole life and will
continue to do so, bigotry of all forms, including anti-Semitism.
I just don't think that if you're a Republican, you're running on anti-DEI, anti-woke, except
for Jewish people, is going to be a winning message for many in your audience that have
been trained to hate everyone, including Jews.
You know what I mean?
I'm not going to be able to
hear.
Terrible pause on kill me.
No, it's good.
It was safe there. That's
astounding, and she does not
know if she's even going to
campaign for him or support
him, but he called you out.
for you, Mike. So I've challenged you to five debates. You've already dodged two of
them. September 15th, Fox two with Rup Raj. You're welcome to come out and explain for
yourself. Your reaction to his challenge to debate. Where do you guys stand on this?
Oh, we have debates where we've got one scheduled. We have another one coming up.
Listen, when you're losing, the only thing you have is this kind of, uh, I'm gonna
debate you, you can't debate me. When you're losing.
Brother.
What the hell are you talking about when you're losing?
Who's losing motherfucker? You're losing. It's all kind of nonsense.
We've been out talking to voters and I'll tell you why he's so
upset and wants to wants to change the narrative. We've
been out and had Democrats for Rogers in the city of Detroit. We had a big press conference
where Democrats of, of, uh, you know, all, all flavors came out and said, I can't vote
for this guy. This is really unprecedented in a race this big in a state like this.
So we've been spending a lot of time talking to Haley Stevens voters who can't quite
uh... get to a guy who is inflammatory anti-semitic
uh... hates mac and i-lan hates for trucks wants to ban gasoline engines
he wants to take the ua w's health care away from them
they are you bet he wants to change the topic we don't we're out there talking
to these people i would encourage him to continue talking
i see in october when people are paying attention we're gonna have a
couple of debates
uh... maybe three
and so we're we're working through all of those details now but i'll
I'll tell you what, we are swamped with people who are Democrats that are afraid of this guy
and Republicans who are fired up about what he wants to do to our state and to our country.
Congressman, are you concerned about this Canadian trade deal?
Dude, this is awesome. I'll tell you why I think this is awesome.
The more we actually present an argument,
As like, you know the anti-trump coalition and even as like Democrats, right?
The more they turn into old-school Democrats, oh
We're winning over we're winning over a lot of Democrats right now to our side. No, you're not
You're not you're literally not okay. It's not real
It's objectively not fucking real at most
The only aspect of this conversation that I will entertain is that.
The only aspect of this conversation I'll entertain is maybe you're like firing up some Republicans.
To potentially do a stochastic act of terror against like a mosque or something.
And also maybe you're firing them up to go and vote.
But you're not winning over Democrats, especially when Donald Trump is as unpopular as he is.
It's just so stupid.
Yeah, he's like, he's doing the Chuck Schumer narrative for every two young opener we close.
We pick up three Democrats in Mackinaw Island.
He is utterly devoid of policy.
He has no national platform to lean on because there are no successes there and only failures.
Israel supporters are basically not going to vote for Abdul.
All other Dems and Republicans are smart enough to want Medicare for all will vote
for Abdul.
Uh, yeah, I mean, there are, there are people who love Israel.
Okay.
There are people who love Israel.
Your numbers are not as great as you think they are.
As I said in my famous, now famous rant, just like with Abdul's statements that were
clipped out of context, mine were as well.
American Jews don't care about Israel as their top priority.
American Jews care about anti-Semitism in the United States of America as one of their
top priorities.
These two things are different.
So as long as Abdul makes a concerted effort to explain to Jewish Michiganders
that he is not an anti-Semite, that his frustration is with Israel and it's also shared by virtually
everybody else, then he will be fine.
And even American Jews who care about Israel are still American, okay?
They're still American.
Jews who care about Israel are American. They have American interests. They do not like Donald
Trump. Like that rabbi that came out, that rabbi that came out and was like, oh, I'm a
Democrat for Mike Rogers. Like that motherfucker is pro Trump. He's been pro Trump. That rabbi
was not like a lifelong Democrat or some shit. He was already pro-Trump. I saw his post from
like years ago, from a couple years ago. Yeah, I want to, I want the US government to subsidize
a missile defense shield for me. Next time I decide to vacation in a war zone, JTA Liz
Freight of Ann Arbor was one of the attendees who went up to speak to outside afterwards.
She told him that her children were soon to fly to Israel and asked if he would
support funding the Iron Dome defensive system. He wouldn't, she recalled the JTA,
A position he's held in public.
I was upset, Fried said.
He doesn't care about the safety of my children.
It's just such an insane demand to make.
Do you understand?
Like that, I'm sorry.
That's like, like that's crazy lady.
What the fuck are you talking about?
But what the fuck are you talking about dude? I'm a single issue voter on this is a crazy
is a crazy assessment to make why why don't you have why don't you take any ownership over your
own actions like do you have no agency? Do you have no agency lady?
Yeah, here's the rabbi by the way. Trump on Netanyahu. Keep going. I speak to him every day.
He's a good man. He's doing a good job. He's been very unfairly treated by his country.
Can Donald Trump issue a pardon for Netanyahu? Says Rabbi Asher Lopatin all the way back on
June 18, 2025. Does this strike you as a guy who made up his mind after Abdul? Do you feel
like this guy was a lifelong Democrat 2025? Asking if Netanyahu can get a fucking part
in Israel. What? Would they campaign with the son, biker Joe Biden, Kamala Harris? What
about backing a G? Kim Jeffries for House Democratic leader? What? Who the fuck is this?
Democratic congressional candidate Christina Hines of Michigan, Marnie Juan Hilpert of
California and Zach Dembow of Kentucky weighing on the party's biggest names.
Wait.
Raise your hand if you would be willing to campaign with Hassan Piker.
I thought that might be the answer.
Raise your hand if you would be willing to campaign with Joe Biden.
Why not?
He's the former president.
Again, I have a lot wait dog. You mentioned my name before the president
What are you saying? Why are you bringing up my name before the fucking president? Oh
My god
I guess I am now as toxic as a guy who did genocide, not that these people have an issue
with him doing a genocide.
I suspect there's another reason, it's because he's deeply unpopular, he's very old.
But okay, listen to me, listen to me, listen to me, okay?
Dr. Chirad promoted the president, yeah.
establishment media trying to commit suicide on purpose. I think that they're so singularly
invested. They're so hyper fixated on this one issue that like they don't realize how this looks
to the normal person who keeps fucking hearing my name, especially because many of them are
reading it as like, Oh, this guy's anti Israel. So you're just trying to kill him.
They're so out of touch.
They're so fucking out of touch
It's gonna be like this forever who is that
Assam Parker responds to Chris Papa's telling CNN who would he would not campaign with us on who is that wait I?
Didn't say that did I say that?
God this Chris Papa's guy is so
He's so not no thwart noteworthy that I don't even remember responding to this did Austin
Let's just make this shit up.
I'm a moderate Democratic candidate.
If I, if anyone I employ campaign with or even appear within a photo unit,
if they're just a civilian voter ever gets so much as a single downvote on a
Reddit comment, I will disavow them repeatedly on every national measure
media outlets until the election and thereafter.
That's us, two NOCs, don't believe they're misinformation, they're not reputable like
POPs to NOCs.
That's crazy.
Out of respect for the people who have served this country in many different forms, but
I am not focused on any of these people from outside of Macomb and Oakland County.
I'm not like all that I care about is actually serving the people there and I would be rather
going to do.
Bro, they're like dog.
It's crazy.
They're like, hey, Marnie, Vaughn, Wilpert and Zach Dembo.
Like you made this up.
These are not real people.
You're making up new names, names no one has ever heard before and being like these
guys are running for office.
Will they campaign with Hassan Piker?
like I don't even know who the fuck these people are man what the fuck Marnie Vaughn
Wilpert is my rep unfortunately we stan Zach Dembo and this community fuck you
Hassan
okay I don't know anything about these guys or why would you campaign with
Maddie Maroon.
For someone running in Macomb County for the house seat, that's a fair answer and less aggressive than I was expecting.
Oh yeah, first order of business for the Democrats is a pure slot meant to appeal to nobody besides 20 political commentators and a couple weirdos on Twitter.
a messaging bill against the democratic socialists of America.
They call this the Hassanabi edit. Welcome, DSA. Welcome. I no longer feel as lonely,
up here, glad to have you. Same guys are doing it, by the way. Moskowitz, Josh Gottheimer,
Skolton and Tom Suozzi.
The Problem Solvers Caucus, the Blue Dog Democrats that do nothing Democrats.
And of course, they hate everything.
They hate absolutely everything that could potentially yield success,
even if it is a mere accident.
Oh, my Lord.
Isn't that awesome?
How to move New York City and run for Senate against Chucky. Yeah, okay.
Amendment House Resolution 1490 offered by Mr. Gauheimer in New Jersey,
strike to preamble and assert the following, where a socialist ideology necessitates a
constitution of power that has time and time again collapsed in communist regimes,
the Soviet regime's authoritarian rule, whereas the United Soviet Socialist Republic's built on
Markson's doctrine subject is people to force collectivization of man-made holo holo to more famine
that stars millions of Ukrainians mass deportations and a sprawling network of gulag labor camps
whereas the people's republic of China under Mao Zedong carried out the great leap forward
whose force collectivization produced the deadliest famine and recorded human history
followed by the cultural revolution whereas Khmer Rouge in Cambodia in pursuit of socialist
to be a murder roughly one quarter of the nation population whereas the democratic socialist
of America. Dude, you can't say Khmer Rouge and then the DSA. You know, DSA, who could
forget some of their bold radical wait they're debating in committee right now
what I hope that I have the opportunity to serve on the rules committee and
perhaps I'll be sitting on that side and I can remind my colleagues of how they
squandered squandered totally squandered the waning days of their majority on
non-binding resolutions but in any event teach their own so mr. Stiles
this resolution condemns socialism correct I'd say so okay what is social I
in particular democratic socialists merrier they have a handy little print
out with the program socialism I'd go through their policies sir I'm noting
the democratic socialists America okay okay a green new deal and mass
incarceration for style I'll go back for all you get your copy it's clear to
me you can't define I'm literally handing you a document sir with all of the
let's write this all of the highlights that the what it sounds like such a nerd
me me me me me you're a nagging me there what is the American's platform what
is capitalism capitalism is the economic system rapper in the United
States that that's your right define it what is capitalism like these aren't
trick questions you're a very smart man what is capitalism to you free
market right or am I free market I'll go with you okay glad I could help you with
that define socialism what is socialism to you we can get a section a dictionary
definition of it you pull up you got it okay right ahead sir I'm offering to you
the entire platform of the democratic socialist of America egalitarian
economic and political theories or movements advocating collective or
governmental ownership and administration of the means of
production and distribution of goods that's Miriam Webster's dictionary
definition of socialism, right, is I trust that that that it is owning the
means trust you I mean you're here condemning it you said right you have
the definition I just said I assume what you read is correct I can't validate I
assume you're you're reading it correctly this seems absurd to me mr.
style if I asked the chairwoman to define socialism she's not going to
give this rigmaroo she's gonna say I'm terrible rigmaroo I'm actually
I didn't ask you a question, I didn't ask you a question,
the Democratic Socialist of America.
I did not ask you a question.
Got it.
Ben, perhaps I can...
Ben here for like 60 months and finally someone says
with socialism is Jesus.
Yeah, everyone in my chest like, wait,
that's what it means?
What the fuck?
I'm out.
I'm just trying to understand the definition of socialism
so that we're all operating off of the same understanding.
Sounds bad.
That's it.
And I thought...
I hate collective ownership over the means of production.
for condemning socialism I think very eager to get I think a hand selected few
baseless lifeless parasitic capital owners should actually continue
controlling the means of production I am a dumb drone I would never be able to
at that level of power over that level of ownership over my own productive
output would be devastating. I'm a dumb idiot.
People who are wanting to condemn socialism to define socialism. So, okay. So now, cutting
about five minutes of my question there. So, going back to you, Mr. Stile. Socialism,
owning the means of production, right?
That's a piece of it, yeah.
Okay. What would you call the Trump administration acquiring a 10 percent equity stake in Intel?
A 15% stake in rare earth producer MP materials,
and a 10% stake in lithium Americas and trilogy meals.
Madam, excuse me.
It's an American first policy
to make sure we cannot compete China.
Do you believe that the government
should own grocery stores?
No.
That would be socialist to you?
I think that would be a type of
overreach of the federal government, absolutely.
Would that be socialist to you?
That'd be a form of socialist, man.
Okay, and if Donald Trump announces tomorrow
that he's going to take a 20% equity stake in Kroger, would that be socialism to you?
I'd want to see the details. Oh, you'd want to see the details. No, but understand the
understanding. Understand the difference. You would 50% for the folks watching at home,
watch the sleight of hand. Because I think this is... Sleight of hand! I'm asking an honest question.
By the way, this is the most overpowered debate technique of all time, which is just
Most of these people don't fucking know anything. Most of these people are dumb as fuck. Most people
are dumb as fuck. Most people that are opinionated don't actually have a firm commitment or knowledge
over the thing that they are opining over. Okay? So it is a classic technique to just
be like, okay, can you define this term for me? What do you mean by this?
It's actually kind of shocking that these guys who talk a great deal about how socialism
is devastating and dangerous don't even know the basic fucking definition of it.
It's actually alarming.
How's the rare earth materials?
Sure.
Oil, right?
Okay.
These have national policy and national security interests at stake, which is why
we have the Defense Production Act.
Fine.
Which gives the federal government certain roles that are non-traditional in the
capitalists.
So let's talk about the resource.
And then the question is where on that dial?
And so the question then becomes, some folks on your side of the aisle would like to have
government on grocery stores.
I think that's nuts.
And if the President of the United States announced that the United States government
was taking a 10%, 20%, 30% equity stake in growth.
You're playing the hypothetical game.
If he were hypothetical, he's an equity ownership.
Mr. Kroger?
And when you asked this style of question, would you let him answer?
because he was trying to answer you when you asked a question. He tried to answer you and
you were talking over it.
Madam Chair.
So I'm just going to ask the two of you to let's get on with this, ask a question, let
Mr. Stile answer it, or Mr. Stile, if you don't want to answer it, say so. Thank you.
Please.
As I said, at the outset, I asked you a very simple question. You answered it, but
the government owning grocery stores would be socialists in your view.
I then posed the question as to whether or not the president announcing that
the United States government would take a 10 percent.
I'm not going to lie.
When the person presiding over the committee hearing remembers the October
revolution,
intimately,
it's not a wonder that so many of these people in Congress are probably
terrified of the prospect of socialism.
like she was probably there you know what I mean she was probably there she
like barely made it out alive came to the United States of America and now is
is terrified of the prospect you know what I'm saying you would agree you have
an opportunity to tell me no that if the president announced a 10 or 20% equity
stake in a national grocer that you would not support that you believe
socialist. I think there would need to be a national security rationale for the
action. I don't see any, you're hypothetical, I don't see a national security
purpose. Okay, that's a hypothetical. So you're we're entering.
Helpful answer. Silly season. Helpful answer. Okay. So the test for you as to
whether or not the US government acquiring a stake in any American
company or any American industry as to whether or not that is socialist is
Whether or not there's any kind of national security application and essentially the United States government can you know so long as they can put together this
Cogent rationale Donald Trump can take equity stakes in whatever companies he deems
Necessary US government. I should say taking equity stakes that he's initiating as long as that national security
Parockative is established that a safe. No, I think you're wildly overstating. I was off by 20 years Virginia Fox is literally
I mean, I was off by approximately 20 years. Virginia Fox is 83 years old.
That is pursuing this resolution. Can't define socialism, Madam Chair.
I did.
And if I'm not asked, this is, I'm talking to the chair very clearly. And if the chairman
of the committee cannot, in my view, distinguish between the socialist way in which this
president is currently operating, acquiring, on behalf of the United States government,
equity interests in company after company after company in an unprecedented way, a way that
no president in the modern era of our country has done that perhaps this resolution isn't
ready for prime time.
But in any event, I know that we'll probably not be convincing to the chairwoman.
So I will yield back to balance in my mind.
Thank you very much, Mr. Ngoos.
Mr.
So, Joe Ngoos is a Corpo Dem who's deeply backed by APAC, but he also comes from
progressive deep blue district in Colorado, it goes to show how mortified some of these
politicians are that they're posturing against this bill condemning socialism. They do not
want to mail like heroes to come to their district. It seems.
I think it will be very illustrative and I will just offer the chairman an opportunity
to close as it relates to what will happen when this vote happens.
How should voters look at that?
How should people receive that when they see the scoreboard for the vote on this resolution
later this week?
I mean, the resolution is incredibly straightforward.
It lays out the policy priorities of the Democratic Socialists of America, lays them out in actual
policies.
Not some abstract concept of what is like you're an academic professor.
It's what is socialism?
And it walks right through what the DSA supports.
And either you agree with that.
Wait, did they do the thing you said they would do?
they dropped the bill with Candice Owens and now they're just doing a Hasan bill. No, this
is the DSA bill. I was joking when I said they're going to drop Candice Owens from that
bill and and do a Hassanabi only bill. They still could do it. I could see Josh got Heimer.
I could see those exact four that are pushing for this bill, the Democrats that are pushing
for this bill do the exact same thing and just do it instead of a dual condemnation
bill, a single condemnation bill on just me, because they know Republicans will vote for
it. I mean, this is, this will probably pass too. Fuck a fuck ton of Democrats would love
to Democrats trip over themselves to vote for condemnation bills against socialism
and communism all the time. It's their favorite fucking thing to do. I've yelled about
for years. It's so dumb. The five talked about you again.
The Senate candidate is doing some mighty fancy footwork over two big controversies.
Bill El Sayed is now apologizing to Jewish Democrats for comments he made in March,
linking an attack on a synagogue to Israel's actions in the Middle East.
But that very same weekend, he still couldn't bring himself apart ways,
but the son, Piker, who just admitted it was El Sayed himself,
himself who personally invited him to do a campaign rally back in the primary.
What's this?
My comments might have been, uh, misconstrued to be justifying something I did not intend
to justify.
Right?
To anybody who feels like, uh, my comments might have been hurtful.
I'm really sorry.
I didn't just admit this.
This has been the case.
This is not like a shameful secret.
Why are these guys doing this?
It's the most annoying thing.
Oh God.
If this is literally slop tuber shit, okay, I said it in a press conference standing next to him
What do these guys think is going on do they think that it's like I just demand that I get invited to this stuff
Yeah, like look look at this
I
Went up to last me come on this journey with them. I said yes absolutely
So when Abdul asked me to stop for him. I was like sure. Let's do it from the frying
Fire moment
Like what is this argument I I know what they're trying to do here's what they're trying to do here's what they're trying to do
Okay. They're trying to claim, they're trying to claim that Abdul is trying to distance himself
from me and also saying that he disavows me. He just hates me, but, but we won't let him get away
with that because here's a clip show of him admitting on accident or secretly unintentionally
that like Abdul had asked them to to go and stomp for him it was offer context
for what it's all it's all to say like you know two Muslims doing taquitos okay
I'm the Muslim number one doing taquitos and Abdul is the Muslim number two doing
taquitos we're both doing taquitos we're getting together and we're doing
taquila okay if they don't get their a sufficient response they wanted they
just make it up and then they move along with the process like oh well he
delivered enough of a reaction he delivered enough of a reaction like he
distanced himself right so now we can hit him on how he's a fake friend and how
he actually secretly still loves him and and how you know he's just lying
he's a lying perfidious Muslim okay he is a lying perfidious Muslim he's lying
to everybody. He is not trustworthy at all. I want to remind people that he is Muslim. That's
what they're doing. Okay. And I called it ahead of time. Like this is why I said it's, it's a, I said
it for months. I said it for months that with these candidates, like if they were to turn around
and then, and then hit the distance button or be like, I'm so sorry for ever bringing this
demon to Michigan then they're just gonna keep saying look at this look at
this dummy look at this dummy he brought this like horrible monster to
fucking Michigan or look at this dummy he brought this horrible monster to
insert whatever state where there's a race right
I am not interested in a conversation about a social media person in California
Why did you bring me to Michigan?
Uh, alright, we already went to Fox News.
Who are you?
Uh, Fox News?
Uh...
Everyone I've talked to has been asking me to ask you.
I love that.
I love the uh, the, who are you, Fox News?
And then waving them off?
That's awesome.
Love it, okay?
I'm just telling you this is not a campaign that is about a single streamer in California.
It's not!
He didn't say anything wrong there!
It's not!
You're a fucking idiot if you think this campaign is about me, dude!
Yeah, but else I eat socialist godfather,
The one and only Bernie Sanders thinks all the backlash on Piker and the socialists is
just a stupid strategy by Republicans.
You know, you come up with these stupid char, I love this by the way because Republicans
are are being called out.
Republix are being called out of that moment.
Being called out for their strategy and the fox news. I was like and that's persistent what we're doing
We are fucking stupid and we are gonna continue doing this
Because you are intellectually bankrupt and you cannot deal with the real issues facing the American people our job is to talk real issues to refute their
stupid
It often bigoted
Charges and I think we do that. We're gonna be just fine
Hasan Piker, Greg, you like him, you dislike him, he's probably here to stay, at least with
the young Americans.
They like the fact he's a provocateur.
But the Democrats, they've embraced him pretty well, up until he gets into trouble.
I don't think he's here to stay.
I think that this is just, like with these influencers, they come and they go.
But Dems are doing this political version of, I don't even know that guy after pictures
Surface of them naked in a hotel room hand. By the way, oh Jesus Christ, Greg, but felt um, they're not even doing that
To this day there is yet to be a Democrat that has done that
Okay, and when they can't get that answer out of them, they just make it up like they did
Also, why is Greg picturing me naked, bro?
That's weird.
Not to the bed.
He's not some random gremlin, you know.
He's an unfiltered version of what much of the party believes, and it would help if they
offered appointed differentiation, but they're not.
Where did the anti-Israel, anti-COP, anti-American, I don't know, opinions come from anyway, all
from the same spot?
You can't say that Piker crossed the line if you didn't draw a line in the first place
and that's always been the problem with this tent.
So I'm just asking, where's the competing product?
Where's the Democrat who will actually say he loves the country thinks Israel can exist
and doesn't think that October 7th or 9-11th is a punchline?
Just saying we don't condone, that's this wussy talk.
The guy living in their basement, they didn't know.
It's like, I'm used to people distancing themselves from me.
I can understand it, I don't, it doesn't bother me at all.
But they're not really distancing them with,
cause they don't tell people what the difference is.
There are major issues that you lost on in 2024.
You've had a couple of years to say what makes you different
on trans, on crime, on the border,
and you should have figured something out.
So don't blame us because you wanna change the subject.
I wanna say, well, we could change the subject
to your policies, but there's nothing there.
So we're kind of stuck with him.
He's like a Somali pirate that like, you know,
took over the USS Nimitz.
They're not even putting up a fight.
A Somali pirate.
You know?
So it probably wouldn't be so, I guess, difficult.
I think they should just say slurs.
Controversial opinion,
I think we should allow Fox News to say slurs.
Because all this like dancing around this shit
is just annoying just say what you mean bro you want to call me the sand and
word go ahead you know
i already know what the fuck you're talking about
you might as well show everybody who you are
you know
is just
just say it
just say it big dog it's all good
He's an influencer. They just come and go read similarly to owe the internet thing. That's
just the fact. Give it some time and the whole thing will blow over. Yeah.
For Democrats to push back against if it weren't that he was running for Senate in Michigan,
not necessarily a progressive state, a blue state maybe, but not necessarily a progressive
By the way, it is very funny that an old crow of the dying corporate backed establishment media
whose entire audience is like 85 year olds in retirement homes
and people running in front of a treadmill stuck in the gym
are like, uh-huh. Yeah, this guy in new media. This is a media guy. He's fucking gone here
today gone tomorrow unlike us we are here to stay baby like all right dude yeah
no you're right you're so right you're so right big dog you are so right it's it's
over this twitch shit done aggressive state and I don't think he wins the
Democrat primary without those like Hassan piker embracing him and going
on the campaign trail with him so that speaks volumes for Democrats again
with. Which is precisely why El Sayed invited him to come and campaign with him
and fundraise for him and to be there the night before the election. That's that
photograph right there. That's precisely why he had him there. He was in a fight
for his life against Haley Stevens. She lost and he won. Okay, fair and square.
But it's also fair to point out that you did invite him and I admire
Hassan Piker verse 8. I admire Hassan Piker. Thank you for saying that.
Wait, is that Ainsley Earnhardt?
Is that is that Scott Hannity's wife? Did she just say she admires me? No. Oh, it's not her.
Is Dana Perino? Fuck. I'm sorry. Okay, don't...
Guys?
Am I wrong?
Am I am I wrong?
Connors as I emailed Gutfeld, the tip of your rich cracker, Connors from a furious bag is
over for you soon.
Don't do it Connors.
No, no, no, no, no.
You're going to pin this on me.
You invited me.
I did fundraise for him and he also said, I don't believe he's moderating at all.
I believe he believes all the things that he said.
And the other thing is at the-
Yes, he's not moderating on his foreign policy position.
Why would he moderate on it?
It is an objectively popular foreign policy position.
He never said he's moderating
on his foreign policy position.
Like, what's the expectation?
He's gonna be like,
hey guys, actually instead of Medicare for all,
money in your pocket, money out of politics,
I'm doing more money in politics, Medicare for some,
and maybe some money in your pocket.
Okay, that's what some money in your pocket most money to Israel. That's my new moderate platform
We're just going to destroy what made this platform and what made this campaign so popular to begin with
You know, we've decided
We've decided we're dialing it back for no reason. Yeah
money
Some money in your pocket Medicare for Israel
Medicare for some Medicare for Israel
Where you get this fake apology, in my opinion, is at the Democratic State Convention in Michigan.
The problem for the Democrats is that they are not a united party, and that is also true
on the state level.
So they get the Democrats together in the room in Michigan and they tell him, you really
need to apologize.
And he can't actually apologize.
What he says is, I'm sorry that you misunderstood what I was saying.
I heard very clear. You were the first to defend the attack on the Jewish preschool
You were the first that's so nasty
God, I'm so angry. I mean now you guys know that they did to Abdul what they did to me as well
They hit him with the Hassan the Hassan edit, okay?
He did not do that
He did not defend the attack against the synagogue that is just defamation
and all my fucking God.
First to say, hurt people, hurt people.
And it was only months later,
after you win the primary,
and you're in a very difficult fight,
and you're losing independence and women,
that you say, oh yeah,
and I'm sorry that you got that wrong.
I know what they're doing,
because now he'll go on all the interviews going forward.
And in the debate that he'll do with Mike Rogers,
if there's a debate,
when it's brought up by the moderator, I'm sure else I will say, I apologize for that.
Yeah, see, this is why apologies don't matter, by the way. This is why apologies also don't matter.
Apologies don't matter in this environment. I'm sorry. They do not matter in this media
environment at all. Okay. Yeah, we got the blue check marks attacking this. Look, look, look.
true American patriot Ronny Chapa, Mexican server in the south side of Chicago, doesn't
know me at all.
He's a Sompiker.
There's absolutely nothing to do with anything.
You clowns that keep pushing his BS is not only pathetic, it's just desperation because
you ain't got shit else.
When you got blue checkmarked guys like this, that means that this narrative is
not working.
Okay.
You got to remember that.
This shit ain't working, dude.
of the
This is the mistakes Dana Perino for Ainsley Earnhardt aka Scott Hannity's wife.
I mean, I think that's funny, but I just genuinely don't know if they would be.
I could see them getting mad about that.
These are self-mdm notifications and side-zone framing, so depreciatory, how do you say this
word?
As he said, his comments could be seen as just fine act.
No more apologies, no more steps back.
Depreciatory. You know what? Existing a long enough timeline and everyone, every clipper
turns into Austin ox. That's what it is. Okay. Okay, Adri. Adri was like, Oh, I'm, I'm clipping
everything that you're doing so that people don't see you out of context. And now it's
It's too good.
Did you see this new 9-11 clip?
9-11.
celebrate the 25th year. America deserved 9 11. We deserved it and we deserved all that
destruction. These people hate America. When will my
garage is condemned is true? You getting clipped out of context? Asking my co-hosts what
they do a four hot fireman came in this room right now.
Wait.
What?
It's not.
I'm talking to lick them all up as quickly as I can.
What else would I do?
I'm going to be eat or grab them and eat them.
All four of them?
Yeah.
Oh.
Face down.
Four of them took you crumble on the top.
Incredible.
Thank you.
Asking my co-hosts what they do a four hot fireman came in this room right
now.
All you got is ops now, I do.
The hand gestures ha ha ha muscle memory at its finest.
Notice how she said, co-hosts are not bridesmaid.
Well, well, well, if it wasn't the consequence of his own actions, wait, what?
Yo, Ben Shapiro has been on a fucking tear.
I, um, I replied to him earlier today, where he thought he could get away with
this like Islamophobic bullshit.
You know who might want to ban both dancing and also bars in New York.
And it's Kathy Huckle at a mosque wearing a hijab.
Right.
I said, I can't believe Ben Shapiro is mad that a politician is wearing
head covering a religious setting out of respect. Ben is an orthodox Jew. He has brought Trump
to the Lubavitcher, rebbeys grave. Trump wore the Kippah. Like, what are you doing, bro?
Did you forget you're Jewish? What the fuck are you talking about? It's so fucking
stupid community notes are so reliable oh my god this is awesome yeah breakfast
club people criticize you a lot they see criticize cripples and make millions
of dollars you may say when I was broke I advocated for the poor they say you're
jealous of the wealthy Hasan has never been broke I grew up affluent and I
didn't have to worry about making ends meet or having to take a job or
anything like that father was a board of a four billion dollar company mom is
a commercial landlord hired by his uncle out of college literally none of
this addresses my point. I like that throughout my history, throughout my history, okay, there
is, throughout my history, there is a moment between college and when I first started working
when I was broke. And I've explained it all over and over again. And what's really
interesting about this, what's really interesting about this is that they just refute, they just
omit that one part of the story. They omit that one part of the story. Did you just be like,
yeah, he's lying actually. I take care of my family. I'm very proud that I am fortunate enough
to be able to take care of my family. Neither my mom nor my dad work anymore. I take care
of them financially, and I am fortunate to be able to do so.
Doesn't really matter. These guys are fucking insane. And yes, I did grow up affluent.
I could have easily lied about it. Why would I? There's no reason to.
The author of that note is a Destiny fan. The pattern of their comics notes. Yeah.
I grew up affluent. By the time I got to college, my dad lost all of his money.
Also, what's really funny about this is that they also advance on the they expand on this line.
They say my dad's a billionaire
Okay
Or they say that my dad is literally a billionaire
Like they added the the value of the holding group that he was a
Coordinator at to make it seem like that's his money
Like okay, man
Yeah, if you're fucking CPA and you work for a black rock you're responsible for all of that money
Literally all their all this community knows are about Hassan my view. What is this?
What the fuck is this? I wrote about Gustavo Guardiola the DSH here caught living in a fancy house and contradictions of rich kid socialism
I wouldn't I would rather fucking die than read that article. I'm sorry even if it's in defense of Gustavo, which I doubt it is
Okay, I'm sorry I
I
This argument is so fucking stupid. This argument is so stupid
Socialism is an ideology
Okay, it's a it's an economic organization of society that you're advancing towards
okay
Your financial status is utterly immaterial
We want rich people to be socialists. We want fucking factory owners to be socialists
Okay, we want everyone to be socialists. What are you talking about? The idea that's why I get so mad
Whenever I hear whenever I fucking hear from dumb fuck leftists
Because I expect liberals and reactionaries of different varieties different seasoning to obviously engage in this kind of idiotic
argumentation but when I hear someone who's a self-avowed leftist a baby leftist usually who
advances this self-defeating agenda. It makes me so mad. Okay? We want everyone to
be socialists. Socialism is not a poverty cult. It's not a vow to poverty. Okay,
which is ironically what I was talking about in that video as well on the
Breakfast Club. We want everyone to be a socialist. Okay? We want rich people to
be a socialist. We want poor people to be a socialist. There is no like there
is there there is no contradiction here okay it's very stupid the establishment
deez our media have pivoted from dsa wins a personal tax raises dog whistles
symbolic house resolutions an obsession with a twitch streamer what would happen
if they devoted that same attention to the thousands of americans who die each
year because they can't afford health care nice
Alright, now DSA is fucking reducing me to just a twist simmer. Come on, DSA. If nobody
got me, DSA's got me. Okay, do a better job defending me. I'm kidding. That's crazy. DSA's
like, Oh, he's just a Twitterer. We don't know. I am but it's small being to stream
not borrow socialism is when nobody works in the government gives everybody $5 a month
and no iPhone and has nothing to do with broadening self-determination of being literal workers
party? Yes. I do own actually own earth. I defend you in mysterious ways. That's cool.
You just always keep them guessing.
You cannot be rich in a socialist.
Read the Bible.
Yeah
Champagne socialist doesn't make sense the concept wouldn't that mean you want wine for all sure
How does it feel that Sid Rosenberg is also banned from Fox News Sid Rosenberg
Welcome to the club Sid me and Sid did two
because a couple of weeks ago
i actually referred to man bomb dotty i called them a terrorist
and they banned me
they said you'll be back but next time
can you say like terrorist sympathizer
and i said no
i'm not gonna say terrorist sympathizer i'm not gonna make it nicer for him
I'm not going to the colors that this man takes on.
I I am in awe of okay.
He's such a beautiful shape and he's always such a beautiful color.
Our Twitch streamer.
Okay, good, better.
That's better.
It's really Thanos
He's got it all dude, I love this guy
Sids an ally. Yes, the foxes caption now says anti-Semite Hassan piker
Dems divided over. Oh, they put it in fucking air quotes
Dude, what are we doing? Do you want it? Is this what it is?
Are they are they like begging for a fucking legal battle? Is that what's going on at this point where they're like?
How far can we go until this also becomes a a matter of?
You know a matter of contention a court in a civil proceeding
Is that what is that what we're doing? Is that what we're doing like I?
Feel like they're just they're aching for a fucking lawsuit
By the way, since October 7, there have been numerous defensive lawsuits against anti-semitism
allegations, and there are certain districts which Fox News operates in, like New York
City, where calling an anti-Zionist an anti-Semite or calling anybody an anti-Semite actually
does fall under an act workable definition of slander and defamation because anti-semitism
carries an additional charge in a place like New York State. So under that jurisdiction,
which Fox News operates under, this could be a legal battle for them, a costly legal battle
for them. I know that I am a public person, technically, right? And I also understand
that this could be under the confines of political speech, but I don't know if you
guys want to entertain this. Just saying. A lot of establishment centers liberals are
just saying it. Yeah. Oh, yeah. I saw this. I'll be honest. Look, people on the left,
we always talk about like the Democrats hate us more than they hate the Republicans.
I didn't really think that they actually had that level of vitriol like it's, you
what man I I'll just fully commit I I I've been saying I hate them as much I will say that I hate
them more than MAGA yeah it feels right you know like with MAGA it feels like a genuine cognitive
limitation I wouldn't be talking about genuine cognitive limitations if I were you Baldi
I
Did Jenny do come to do limitation?
Yeah, hodge in order to be establishment you need to be established big dog all you've established is 15 sex
Pestiny orbiters that come into your chat to offer you a view
When you're you know defending him
You know what I mean like a hardcore MAGA person we're dealing with someone who is not
They're not. They're not. They're not working with a full box of crayons, you know?
That's how I feel about Hodge as well as Mago.
Whereas with with people like a son, it's just endless cynicism, dishonesty.
Insane double standards, narcissism, you know,
he knows what he's doing.
They know, they know that they're just like, this is all just fucking ridiculous.
And with Magga, it's like, you know, they're kind of they're kind of working with not not not a full deck of cards, you know.
I'm pretty sure D said this first.
Hutch is just towing the line.
His ideological dad drew out.
Yeah, it's got to be the saddest fucking state of affairs to be be a desperate orbiter to a sex pest
But yeah, here's the thing. Here's the thing
Uh going back to the fox news like calling me anti-semi shit
It is actionable
It is prosecutable. It is being prosecuted right now and and the people that are being falsely slandered as anti-semitists are winning
So I'd be very careful. There's a bunch of lawsuits all around the country right now
Where people are winning for being falsely accused of anti-semitism
Uh and like losing their jobs and things like that, you know what I mean? Our twitch streamer
I saw that already the only condemnation of you that I take seriously. What the fuck is this?
Slacks at this point. Oh, yeah, a woman's business. Yeah
Yeah, I'm looked at your body you're looking lies. I'm the CEO of fire and ice dude
I thought I do think I
No, I've lost mad weight because I mean I stopped I was stop lifting weights and then I was
was a vegan for like 18 months and then I was an alcoholic for 13 months after that.
So the comment, there was overlap but I basically lost all my muscle mass, testosterone dropped
way through the floor in my mid 30s and then I got a second cat.
And so now I see what, this is like how people try it before they bulk, before they like,
this is like the cut.
Quitting and joining tasks because Nick Mullin is more ethical than you.
There's not going to be any but what I'm saying is no, no.
He must be more ethical than me because he also he too indoors or I'm I'm Donny.
They shot a video together and no one has made a peep about that.
So clearly he must be.
Clearly he must be a far more ethical, far more above board,
far nicer individual than myself.
Hey, is this good?
What is this?
Sources telling CNN Army Secretary Dan Driscoll has submitted, oh shit.
The breaking news in our politics lead, a top civilian leader in the Department of Defense
is out.
Sources telling CNN.
The breaking news in our politics lead, a top civilian leader in the Department of
Defense is out.
Sources telling CNN Army Secretary Dan Driscoll has submitted his resignation to President
Trump.
The news first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
Kristen Holmes and our colleague Kevin Lipteck, with the start of the CNN, Kristen's now live
at the White House.
Kristen, people want to not recognize the name, but Dandriskel is a big deal for a lot
of different reasons.
Why is he resigning?
He had had months of friction.
We had been reporting that this could be a possibility for quite some time.
In fact, we actually had stories months ago about this underlying friction that hadn't
quite spilled over yet.
At that time, the friction was coming from the Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth
towards dandruff school but in the last several months it appears is what's
confusing to me about this whole process is um
uh... is this guy dandruff school stupid
does he not understand that we won super hard
in iran like why would he quit
this doesn't make any sense
if you're the army secretary and work
you know winning super super hard like not like not once not twice
but approximately three hundred times
Why would you quit? Is it because you got tired of winning? Is that what it is?
You were like, man, we're winning too hard. Mission accomplished. Like my job here is done.
Is that what's going on? I don't get it. Is he being anti-Semitic?
So that friction has been two-sided. This was something that was expected. I was
sold by one source. There was no surprise here that he submitted his resignation, although I
I will tell you that I talked to other members of the administration who said that they were
hoping that he would last a little bit longer, just as this continuation of this Iran war
is playing out right now.
We did get a statement just seconds ago from the White House.
I'm going to read it to you.
It says, Secretary Driscoll has been highly effective in advancing President Trump's
agenda to make America strong again at the Department of the Army by providing outstanding
leadership during historic military operations, restoring an emphasis on readiness and
and lethality, assisting with negotiations between Russia and Ukraine and more.
The United States Army is more powerful than ever thanks to his work alongside the Commander-Chief
and Secretary of War.
Since the publication of this article, retired colonels Robin S. Kurt Slickster, Tom Anderson
of all now acknowledged being SGE employees.
Oh, this is from yesterday's news, yeah.
the war hired a bunch of civilian PR people without telling anybody that they were doing
PR oftentimes just for Pete Hegze.
They did so only after the publication of this article. They did so after the Pentagon flatly
declined to comment on the issue last week ahead of the publication withholding their
SGE status. As reported by the Post, they were associated with the Senior Service
College Task Force. The Pentagon has not explained why it held basic details about
this issue for days, including following days of speculation about other SGEs on
social media. The Pentagon did not respond to additional questions posed by the post about
this matter.
Akim Jeffries, Laura Lumar is a stone cold racist pathological liar and a nut job. Oh,
the sex panther. Laura Lumar is a stone cold racist. A stone cold racist. A pathological
Liar and a nut job, Laura Loom.
That's right.
God, he's so fucking hot.
I use it's hard.
It's hard to pay attention to what he's saying.
I'm just so turned on every time I hear him.
He is so charismatic.
It's kind of crazy.
How do we get so lucky that we have a generational talent
like Hakeem manning the ship?
You know what I mean?
No.
Look who it is.
Look at that.
Look at the door.
Hello.
You can use your tail wagging.
Kyle.
Do you want to treat?
Oh.
Do you want to treat?
Kyle.
Come in.
Oh.
Oh, he got it.
He got it.
Can I come in?
Almost.
Hiya.
Come here.
Can I open the door?
There's a hole on the other side that she she could poke her nose through, but she can't.
She can't see the hole.
She's too dumb.
Ty, door's open.
Kyle!
Heh heh.
Heh.
Let's see if you figure it out.
Oh my god!
What?
I think that's a good one.
she's so polite now she's impolite
He's like oh I'm sad now. What should I give her a treat? Is that what you want? You want a treat?
Oh she's, she's like I'm aware of the way you behave. I'm aware of your cunning ways now.
You lost her trust beef liver she's fucking drooling.
Oh God.
It's crazy because she downs it.
She downs it in a second. Stop saying treat my dog is on my
ass right now and you just got one fuck off.
Your hand smells great now. No, actually, this doesn't even smell bad. She's like, yeah, I got my treat. I'm out.
What was I gonna say? Oh, yeah, this is gonna be the new meta. They're gonna be like Hassan abuses his dog by saying the t-word
Hassan abuses his dog by saying the t-word and then not immediately offering a t-word, you know what I mean?
Jared mozquez is legitimately stupid. What is this you have been a long supporter of Israel know when the question's that
My question though is, are there things that Israel is currently doing, that the Netanyahu
government is currently doing, whether it's in Palestine or Gaza or whatever their policies
are, that you do find fault with, that you are critical of?
Yeah, I think what's going on in some of the settlement areas is inappropriate.
I think what's going on with the settlers, I don't think the Israeli government is
doing enough to tamp down on that violence.
I think they need to do that because in order for them to talk about violence
somewhere else, they got to be able to handle the violence on their side. So I do not think
the Israeli government is doing a good enough job when it comes to settlers. But Jim, I want
to go back for a second, right? For me, it's just about double and triple standards, right?
There's a war with Ukraine and Russia. There's a million people dead in that war,
unfortunately. When Assad gassed his own people, mustered gas, 600,000 people were
killed. When protests came out in Iran, 50,000 people were killed just trying to protest, express
a freedom of speech. And we didn't see protests in the street for any of those people.
Well, I would say the reason why you-
Yo, it was wild when we fucking funded Assad. Also, there were a shit ton of protests during
Ukraine. What the fuck? I just don't even know. God, I can't. This argument is so dumb. How
will you not have the best talking points at this point? Like, how are you still flubbing
this? Yeah, breaking Trump administration's anti-Semitism laws through the US. Harvard
is dismissed. The judge said the government complained his devoid of any factual allegations
the universities failed to comply with the law. Yeah, there are a lot of... Finish the
Cleveland gets worse. I don't care. I fucking don't give a shit about Moscovitz. I'm gonna
be honest with you. I think he's so... I think he's so nasty. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs
The joint force is not going to be the joint force.
joint force is going to be, it is going to be ice.
Yeah, I don't think it's going to be the military.
That's a, that's a far too tall an order.
That's too tall of an order for them to be able to do that.
Um, Elsa, Elsa, of course, Jewish dark as well won't dump
pikers from 15 hours ago.
Why it matters.
Elsa's parents from the state parties, Jewish Crocs, an important early testimony in pivoting
from the primary candidate who electrified the party's progressive wing to a general
election, nominate the big one, Piker.
Elsa had initially condemned the attack. Then the next day, he released a formative video
which he called an evil act of displaced rage, but also said that hurt people, hurt
people, referring to the perpetrator. He asked people to imagine his family had
never died. Said that the violence is a cycle, which was correct.
He then also told, uh, the, the Jewish caucus, uh, I made a mistake.
I should have issued a statement, of course condemning it and it should have just been
that the full stop.
We condemn that terrorist attack.
What I was trying to do is offer context to the why it happened, but it wasn't the time
for the context.
But he didn't say, I'll say it keeps being asked to repeat it.
Piker, the in senior leftward shimmery keeps refusing as repeatedly by a reporter
Saturday about Piker.
I'll say I wouldn't engage if you want to make this raise about a shimmer in
California.
I just think you're missing the boat.
He said, he later said, uh, he was not interested in a conversation by the social
media person in California.
And Piker is an enormous fan base, but he also has a long history of inflammatory remarks.
Some widely condemned as anti-Semitic.
I like that we're not even, this is how, this is how the media cycle fucking turns into,
turns it on its head, right?
Like they can't say the comments were anti-Semitic, but they prod enough and then they get a
sufficient response, uh, and, and people come out and condemn it as anti-Semitic.
So then now they could just say, oh, widely condemned as anti-Semitic.
Where's the journalism?
Elsa has dealt with him and appeared alongside Piker.
Here's the one thing Elsa said.
Here's this one thing Elsa said.
Do you now condemn everything he stands for?
Elsa has said in April mimicking the routine of reporters and I'm like, in what fucking
world does this work that way?
He dismissed the questions again, and gotcha.
Yeah.
Hakeem Jeffries, Elsa responded, statement, all Americans deserve the right to advocate.
He did not call out piker by name.
I'll say it has been that he can ask to age critics by skeptics by reducing
piker to a mere Schumer without antagonizing piker of the followers who helped
and win the primary.
No, I don't think that's what's going on.
I don't know why these guys constantly do this.
And look, I don't have any inside information on this, but like he, just
like everybody else fucking understands that I'm not anti-semitic.
Even the people who are calling me anti-semitic deep down inside,
Or very openly understand that that's not the case. They're just using this as a as a way to to discipline another critic of Israel
Also does earn plotters for a thousand retail campaigners voting challenger as the plaker else is running may responding to Elsa's Saturday
Apology registered on X&E has six most apologize for his incredibly horrific remarks
Yeah, see that's what happens when you apologize like I hope that I hope that the the
community in Michigan that were deeply affected by what he said, which in my
opinion was not untrue, will hopefully, you know, will hopefully say like it's
good that he is understanding of our plight of our feelings. And yeah,
I think there are.
I'm not even kidding.
I think there are people.
His voter is a single issue voter in Michigan.
A man from Virginia said in a moment of grace, El Sade said, at the Jewish Caucus Gallery
in Birmingham, I made a mistake.
Michelle Zikowski-Sirlin of Comstock Township Attendant, the event, he said, El Sade, who
is Muslim, had made a stronger effort to reach out to Jewish Democrats.
Zikowski Sir Lin doesn't plan a vote for Al-Said in November because it was a relation with
Farlav Khamateyra Sambaygar, and what she sees is a lack of acknowledgement of Israel being
a Jewish state.
Okay, yeah, I think one is probably a little bit more impactful in her decision than the
other, right?
I'm reading in Dana Nessel Zikowski Sir Lin said, Wait, what?
Lamaze is a woman who wears an Israeli flag dress everywhere she goes in public, OMG, what?
Oof, yeah, it's her.
Yeah, someone tells me she was not voting for Abdel, I'll say it, but...
You know, that's one of the votes that you're just not going to get, you know?
That's not Dana Nessle. I know who Dana Nessle is. That's the other person.
Dog, if you're an anti-Semite, I'm an anti-Semite, and my grandma's cousin were gas-alpha, it doesn't matter.
You're invisible in the eyes of mainstream media.
Anti-Zionist Jews do not get... Anti-Zionist Jews are also as blacklisted as I am from mainstream outlets, okay?
As a matter of fact, if you go past a certain point, you don't even have to be an anti-Zionist.
If you're Jewish and you go past a certain point of Israel critique, you fall into the category of too dangerous to have on air.
God forbid we show the full spectrum of opinion in this community. God forbid that would be too dangerous for Americans to hear from.
Scroll down for photos. Was she wearing the Israel?
Israel. Oh my God, she was. Oh my God. I can't believe she's not voting for Abdu.
It's, wow, that's shocking to me.
Yeah, I wonder, I, I can't, I can't place my finger on it.
I, I can't seem to figure out what her single issue is.
I wonder, as a voter, tough to tell, tough to tell, why would you say that anti-semitism?
Yeah, I'm sure Bob will apologize to her directly.
She'd be like, I'm going to vote for you now.
You just hate fashion.
True.
This is true.
I do.
Congressman John James who is
also the Republican nominee for
governor in his state.
He joins us from Rockford,
Michigan.
Good morning to you,
Congressman.
Hey, Margaret.
Good morning.
Thank you so much for having me
on.
I'm really excited because I
excited because in a state like Michigan,
we have the most extreme ticket running
with Abdul Assyed and Jocelyn Benson campaigning
with people who said that we deserve 9-11.
I say never forget.
Wow. I want to ask you about-
She said, wow. Bro. Bro came in.
Bro came in and made,
wait, oh my God, he made it 20 seconds.
20 seconds, that's a new record.
20 seconds.
Wow, that's so that's so good. You got the zbs anger going wow
Apologies mr. James, but this was a brilliant use of your time frame one he speed ran it dude
And with people who said that we deserve 9-11 I said never forget
Wow, I want to ask you about some issues with your platform and the like but
But never forget, of course, I'm-
He's like, what you- I mean, that was going to be like the first 10 minutes of this conversation.
You just ruined it for me.
Sorry, did you just accuse Senate candidates of something to do with terrorism?
I'm not clear on what you just said.
Yeah, they're campaigning with extremists who say that America deserved 9-11.
And I think that coming up on the 25th anniversary of 9-11, these are statements that are way
out of bounds and should definitely be clarified.
Michigan is ground zero for this republic in this next election.
And we need to make sure that we stop socialism and that we save the state of Michigan
because we don't do it here.
It's going to go to the rest of the country.
Okay. I think you're talking about a supporter of a Senate candidate that that Senate candidate has
started to distance himself from and that influencer, Hassan Piker, has disavowed those past comments
he made. But let's put that aside because I don't want to get into that. I want to talk about you.
That's crazy. Dude, that was cool. I've never seen something like that. That was that was
unique man that was fucking unique what is this lunatic Hassan piker has no
place in our politics with representative Lawler Mike Lawler oh god I'm
not fucking listening to either of these idiots Hassan pikers being attacked by
the entire political machine for saying that the conflation of Jewish people
with Israel is dangerous because of how violently Israel behaving but this
could stoke anti-semitism this connection between Israel and Zionism
that is expressed over and over again through a lot of these Jewish institutions
is teaching people the idea that Jews are monolithic and this is a dangerous mode of propaganda
because people don't fuck with Israel any longer and if Jews in America keep
putting this idea out there that they are singularly invested in Israel
eventually someone's gonna come around and take action not against the state
of Israel mind you but against American Jews I don't know how people don't
Don't recognize how dangerous this predicament is, how dangerous this is for Jews.
You're making anti-Semitism worse.
But many, including people attacking you now, have made the same point.
Some American Jews in Congress who support Israel and support what you just said say
that a lot of the actions by you and your government are making Jews in the United States
unsafe.
Congresswoman Hailey Stevens, she's running for Senate in Michigan, said, Benjamin Netanyahu
has made us less safe. He has frankly put Jews in an uncomfortable position across the country.
You can't have the kind of policies that the government of Israel is engaged in and not expect
that there's going to be pushback and backlash. As Recline warned about this exact same thing,
anti-Zionism is rising as a response to what Israel is doing. It will simply not be possible
to treat it as a marginal viewpoint that can be shamed or shunned into invisibility.
Yes, anti-Semitism often cloaks itself in anti-Zionism, so don't do the anti-Semites' work for them.
If you keep telling people that if they oppose the Jewish state, they must hate Jewish people, eventually they will believe you.
And this isn't a new idea.
In 1944, before Israel was established, Jewish political philosopher Hannah Aren't warned
that if a nation billed as a Jewish state became entangled with contentious international struggles
and ignored the will of its Arab and Mediterranean neighbors,
Jewish people could be conflated with the consequences and actions of that state.
Nevertheless, here we are.
Israeli forces just killed a four-year-old.
They bombed a mosque and a water desalination plate.
Israeli settlers are besieging an Ohio man's home in the West Bank right now.
And instead of doing anything about that, the US political machine is instead going
after a guy who said, as many others have, that it's dangerous to conflate Jewish
push people with this violent behavior.
I'm done. So don't any reporter ask me again about Pisan Piker.
It's not what November is about.
And I'm still trying to figure out,
is it the reason he exercised and then looks back,
is why he has so many foulers.
You would think that a party that is supposed to represent
of left-ish, you know, left-of-center politics in the US
would be sort of very keen to align themselves
with by far the most popular streamer, left-wing streamer
in the country, you know, a man that streams for eight hours
a day, which is unbelievable, and regularly
gets sort of tens of thousands of people watching his streamer
any one time.
You would think that, especially a party that
has spoken so much about the importance of a broad church,
would be very keen to at least find some common ground
to try and tap into the clear kind of coalition
of potential voters.
We have to understand why this is the case.
The reason this is the case is because when you have
a broken political system,
a political system that is not fundamentally democratic,
that is completely captured by vested interests,
the role of the main establishment parties
is not to reflect the politics of the people,
it's to make the politics of the people.
And one way in which you do that
is you create a very, very narrow range
of political ideas that people could be exposed to
and political ideas that you can legitimately hold.
And for the Democrat side,
that means really, really narrowing the boundary
of what can be considered an acceptable left
or center-left politics.
And that inevitably involves neutralizing or delegitimizing
anyone who falls outside of that.
Yes, please.
Yes, Mr. President, thank you so much for doing this.
So first of all, on health care affordability,
which is a big issue for voters,
the main proposals from the identified
of Socialism in America is Medicare for all,
paid by the government, by the taxing,
and the higher powers.
How do you contrast that approach
with what you were highlighting today,
which has been where these private companies are
on the board general and positive Americans?
Well, this is much bigger, much better, much less expensive,
and it's something that works.
The other doesn't work.
And, you know, when you talk to Medicaid,
for usually that's the entire budget of the whole country.
So you'd have to quadruple taxes.
The other thing is I understand it.
You'll lose if you have private health care,
if you have private something.
Something where really a lot of people
are very, very happy with what they have privately.
And they lose all of that.
They lose everything they've had.
And there's, there'd be a tremendous backup.
But it's actually, in many cases,
bigger than the budget. I remember they tried it in Vermont and they tried it in a few places.
They went into it and they realized it costs more money than the entire amount of money
taken in. And this was by a liberal governor, very liberal, who wanted to do it. And I'm
all for anything, but what we've done today is we've broke down prices and you get
the level of prescription drugs and care, ultimately care, that you could never get
the other way. It just, it just happened to work.
U.S. Central Command says it struck two Iranian rocket launches on Iran's Iraq.
New Abdul Ghajit Shraab, he's both Muslim and lies about his height, I guess.
Charlemagne, the guy that's five, six, Abdul Ghajit claims to be five, eight.
Takedoman. What won't this guy lie about, dude? First, he lies about being a, being
awoke when he's very clearly an Islamist jihadist.
This is why calling yourself not a socialist won't work.
Do you think he's a socialist? He clearly is a socialist.
You look at his entire political program, it's fundamentally about handing out
political favors, university education spots, jobs to his favored ethnic groups.
And again, if you disagree with it, he'll call you names, he'll call you white supremacists.
This is not Bernie Sanders style socialism. This is good racial group bad racial group if you're
Yeah, they're saying he's a race socialist, which is a different kind of socialist
What the fuck is this Hollywood is a complete disaster despite the name is getting very little
work John and many others in the industry are suggesting with the federal tax incentives
to make it great again greater than ever before meetings are being set up with the leaders of
both parties in order to get this done it should be bipartisan especially since so much
money is being lost in California and other largely blue states. I'm going to suggest that
Republicans and Democrats get together and immediately craft legislation to say the movie
television entertainment business in America. Congress should approve immediately a federal
production incentive to create entertainment jobs in America. It can be done quickly,
accurately, efficiently, and importantly will benefit all of America. What we watch
on the silver screen should be made in what was once the movie in motion picture capital
of the world is get this done.
I mean, John Voight is probably the dumbest guy to get this accomplished with, but he's
not wrong.
I mean, the industry has left.
There's a lot of other states that have offered like tax benefits.
And largely, I think largely also it's because a lot of movies are shot in Canada now.
Atlanta gets a lot of production. Canada gets a lot of production. Vancouver, unfortunately,
Los Angeles has lost a lot of its business. And it's terrible because you see it in the
bones of the city. I gotta tell you this much. I went to my tailor the other day to pick
the suit up and I wanted to get a navy suit done and we were looking through we were looking
through different fabrics and we walked into a store that apparently used to be very crowded
like would get a lot of business but it didn't get it doesn't get that much business any
longer because um the fabric store no longer is is selling to local hollywood productions most
relatable story gonna get clip for sure very relatable man wow yeah not also it's ironic because
Because, Taylors are not- Taylors now have become rich people's shit, but it's not technically
rich people's shit, but it's fine, it doesn't matter.
Yeah, people wear suits are rare?
No, they're not.
They're just rare here, but it's actually not that rare for someone to go to a Taylor
amount I mean on the internet it is
and in this community it definitely is is Abdul doing a flood the zone strategy
Michigan's Democratic Senate nominee Abdul Elsa would join me tonight at 9 p.m.
eastern. Now we're gonna counting and you look weird just dressing business casually
pending the industry. As someone who works in a theater on the west coast a problem for
more than just a year for sure. And yes, chatters have never gotten close fitted for them.
And the Democrats don't matter. The real opposition is the media and the way to deal with them is
the flood to zone with shit. I mean, it's true. That's why I can't get my fucking word across
even though I am the media in some respects. So I'm doing my very best over here as a fucking
island. But yes, it would be valuable to be able to go on these outlets. And under different
circumstances, they would, under different circumstances, they would allow me to, but
this is, you know, they have a higher purpose here. They have a, finish the story. That's
it. The story is, the story is that the business is not, um, this is not booming
And places that used to move units are no longer moving units.
The island that were getting ready to deploy mines into the Strait of Hormuz, Sankom says.
Well, it describes the attack as quote, limited precise action.
Iran, responding by firing missiles at US targets in Jordan and said it launched drones
towards the UAE. The UAE says it intercepted a drone approaching from Iran over its territorial
waters.
Well, in an interview on Sunday, US President Donald Trump insisted that US economic pressure
against Iran will ultimately win the war.
We're doing a great job. The blockade has been unbelievable. The financial, the financial
hits that we're giving them, we're hitting them very hard, never, nobody's ever been
hit like this. And they're a failing nation right now. And at the right point, we'll either
win or they'll do something. But I don't mind winning, just winning the better. I don't
need a signature and a piece of paper.
We've got Elena Trina at the White House, and what we know about these latest strikes
both from the U.S. and in retaliation from Iran, and what is Donald Trump saying today?
Look, I think a key question as we look ahead after this exchange of fire, Becky, is one,
of course. This is the potential to really escalate the war in a way we haven't seen
in over a month. You mentioned it, but these are the first strikes that we've seen since.
I agree with you, but you have to accept that there are not that many people who will buy
a piece of clothing that costs, and necessarily cost more than a full-mall salary of an average man.
How much do you think tailoring costs?
More than two thousand.
I'm not talking about like a like a bespoke suit
Like just tailoring like having a tailor someone who mens your fucking old clothing or someone who fits your jackets to your size brother
Depending on the need it can range from $20 to $100 like alterations
What the fuck are you talking about?
Even in this day and age.
So fuck I got $20, I think I fucking sure for put it on keep moving true.
To give an example, the shadow of how my letterman Taylor and that's just a $300 jacket.
Apparently it's bad the more the victims have been lauded and bush. Well, some of us are not racists or sociopaths
Oh, yeah, they're getting mad at Abdul for deleting this like he deleted all those old tweets today
I'm more than 3,000 lives 6,000 injuries and infrastructure devastation a nursing perpetrated ignorant Lee in the name of my faith
Tomorrow all more than 1 million lives millions of injuries and infrastructure devastation in three countries perpetrated ignorant Lee in the name of my country
Clearly, this is what's going on.
He's struggling, you know, it's a tight black t-shirt although you look like you have a black t-shirt on but you have a jacket
But you know you have the background to go where he's like trying to it's like a little guy
I don't know if he's a little guy looks a little but he has kind of trying to do that gym bro thing
Because I guess that appeals to dude. I they need to get Laura off the airwaves man. I'm gonna be honest with you
I'm gonna be honest with you
She's too horny she I've never seen I've never seen someone so horny when talking about Abdul
I don't know what the play is here. I don't know why is it because she's just like legitimately is horned up
up. Is this like to agitate the watchers? To be like, no, you're our beautiful blonde
woman. Why are you thirsting after a Muslim man?
have you seen him? Abdul, yeah, he's a good looking guy. I just, I'm just like confused as to what's
going on with Laura Loomer. Why she can't like keep it in her pants? Why can't she keep it in her pants?
It's very strange. The podcast, Rose, I don't know what it, but it doesn't work. And I think
everyone in the party is so uncomfortable with it, you can feel it.
Yeah, I get a pass anyway. I'm from New York. Everything runs the size too small. So I think
I'll say it. Maybe you may not like it with me, but it's not a shtick. Like that's been
my favorite. This guy's clearly a phony and a fake. She's mad. She's like, don't say that about my
boyfriend. Don't say that about my boyfriend. That's her. Don't say that about my boyfriend
face. AOC was asked about you again. Nice.
I cannot believe this is still going on. Dude, what I think for the rest of my
life, this is for the rest of our lives, we all died. We're all in hell.
And for the rest of our lives, we have to wake up every morning and condemn
Hassan Piker. Okay. I do it every morning. I wake up and the first thing
that I say is I condemn Hassan Piker. I do 10 M Israel highs. Okay. Google trends. Who
is Hassan Piker? In the past year, it peaked on August 1st, and then it dipped again,
And then it's back out, baby.
1,600% up versus last year.
It's number one in Michigan.
No!
What is Twitch?
You should just do a Sompiker for trends. I mean, we know, we know that it's like peaking
again. Yeah. October 4th, Shocktober at 98 at 100 now. Wow. It's past. The Hassan Piker
Here is a dangerous anti-Semitic terrorist has now passed the point of Shocktober.
All time?
I mean, that's not even a question.
There's no reason here, past five years, yeah.
Shocktober is still the peak.
much worse. Yeah, I mean, of course, people are going to be searching Hasan Piker a lot
more. I can't believe Shocktober was your biggest controversy, of course, dude. The
NCNRC machine put out barely searches, barely reaches, Shocktober's crazy, really shows
most really people don't give a fuck. Yes, because shocktober was on the internet.
New Michelle Goldberg. How else I could dispatch is Tom Piker problem. Oh my God. Here we go. She called me a fucking idiot last time. So
Sherping from Miami? Yeah, you're Netanyahu. Sherping from Miami? Nice. No, I think he's
out. He's no longer in Miami. I think he had to leave.
Michelle Goldberg. How else could dispatch Zampiker problem? It's frustrating and unjust
that Alvarez's relationship with the leftist influence of Zampikers become a discourse
binasible. Donald Trump's relationship with the right winger. Laura Loomer is shooting
as old news. Loomer is by any rational measure the more influential figure. Administration officials
she targeted were purged from the National Security Council on Friday. She claimed credit for the
deportation of British rival, Milo Annapolis, who'd become her enemy. Loomer is also openly
bigoted in a way that outstrips the most offensive things Piker has ever said. Over the
weekend she called Angie Nixon the Democratic Senate nominee in Florida a ghetto bitch who
speaks Ibonics. But noting this unfairness, as many progressives are now doing, is not
going to make Elsie's Piker problem go away. We can and should denounce double
standards, but successful candidates must also navigate them. And right now,
I'll say the Democratic candidate for Senate admission is letting this one trip him up
Piker is now because he's the left-wing incarnation of a type that until recently mainly exists on the right the shock-shock
stomping on liberal taboo seems to energize him
But that means praising the Houthis in Yemen defending the Chinese occupation of Tibet or calling for Marx's Lenin's discipline of the Democratic Party
Until recently the only major American political citing Lenin were right-wing revolutionaries like Steve Bannon
The ban is not a revolutionary Michelle Goldberg. You're well read enough to know that he is a fascist or a counter-revolutionary
Pyger makes incendiary statements and then tries to shrug them off as provocations.
He's joked that he is the Rush Limbaugh for Zoomers.
The rise of Limbaugh and his ilk worked out quite well for Republicans helping them wrench the country to the right,
but it's far from clear that Democrats either can or should fall the same template.
Typical liberal instincts, once again, always want to fail. It's all good. Let's continue.
The Republican Party is more homogenous in the Democratic Party,
so there's less need to accommodate cultural differences within it.
There are more conservatives than leftists in America and in our system conservative rural areas of the country have more electoral power
Democrats will have a far harder time than republicans building power, which I didn't least sectarian message
This is not a certain least sectarian message. The policies are broadly universal the policies are all universal and they're also good for everybody
Okay
People don't have to like my style of commentary people don't have to even agree with me
They just have to agree with the policies and many of them already do so it's important for everyone to
Universally get on board with these universal programs
But of course the debate over piker isn't just about antics is about control of the party's future piker an avatar for the democratic
Party's insurgent left is hostile to other parts of the democratic coalition
He doesn't just want to make room for anti-zionism in the Democratic Party. He wants to make Zionism anathema. Yes
Yes, I do. She is not wrong. He once said that any Zionist tendencies to be true to the same was a rabid neo-nazism
And that no one who's ever expressed positive views about the state of Israel belongs in public office
My own feelings about the state of Israel have become decidedly negative
But it's easy for me to see why pikers rise panics some Jews or most American Jews the land of Israel is bound up by their faith
That alone doesn't give them the right to any particular piece of real estate. The Bible is not a land deed
Okay, respect respect Michelle
But many are deeply threatened by the way that they see a left-wing drive to drum Zionist out of public life
For them to victory of Elsa Ed who campaign with piker again. She does this thing that I think is
not
appropriate for
someone of her intellectual stature and
I think it's it's a
switcheroo
It is a switcheroo where she substitutes Zionist with Jewish
Okay
The left-wing drive, the drum-zine is out of public life, is the left-wing drive to demand
that the Democratic Party care about genocide and want to hold Israel accountable.
That is a perfectly normal desire from someone who is outside of the confines of the establishment.
Saying Bannon isn't revolutionary is calling Leninism a non-revolutionary ideology secret
left calm. Okay, calm down. Yeah, it's a sleight of hand.
To them, the Victor Revelle said, who campaigned with Piger during the Senate primary would
open the door to their own ostracism. It's a measure of Jewish anxiety that Michigan's
Jewish attorney general, Dana Nessel, speaking privately with Jewish Democrats this past
weekend, urged them to sacrifice their own comfort safety and security stand with
a party that some feel betrayed by. I hope they listen. To me, there's no question
that Trump and his villainous menagerie are infinitely worse than Piker, but telling people
to ignore their own perceived self-interest, the hard sell, and El Saad should try to make
it easier.
He's already taken one important step to reassure Jewish voters.
A few weeks ago, Jordan Acker, a Jewish Democrat who has known El Saad for years, told me
that for much of Michigan's Jewish community, the problem with El Saad was not his foreign
policy, but his response to the attack on Temple Israel synagogue near Detroit in
March.
Speaking to Jewish Democrats, Zwieg and El Saad offered a sincere apology and
moved the people who want to be moved, said Acker, who spoke to several people
who were there.
Also, that is also reportedly planning to hire Jewish outreach director, outreach director,
but Piker remains a sticking point. Again, this is not the Axios, it's no longer the
Republican party saying this. This is literally Michelle Goldberg. Michelle Goldberg is not
a random person. Michelle Goldberg is a very well read prolific New York Times opinion
editorial columnist. Okay. This is like, like Ezra Klein status for those of you who
are maybe oblivious. So for her to say stuff like this is in my opinion very
silly. It just you know I've read a lot of her columns. I actually like a lot of
her opinions. It you know I think there are some biases here that are hard to
overcome even if you are someone who is well read, you know, observant and
and also thoughtful, it just makes me sad to see, okay.
I'm not interested in a conversation
about social media person in California.
I'll say it to a reporter on Saturday,
it's a dodge since he's the one who made
Piper Salient by stomping with him in Michigan.
Oh my God.
It would be so much better
if he could show voters a poll about Piper
that he understands what they're worried about
in 2008.
Oh my God.
And then they go back to 2008, Barack Obama.
Campaign faced a crisis when comments
from his passenger on my right emerged,
including the clip of right damning America,
Obama turned what could have been, if he asked, going to one of the best speeches of his career,
one in which he tried to explain the anger of discipline of civil rights activists, the
white voters, and the anger of the disposite white working class, two black voters.
It was a massive piece of empathy, and at the time, it felt that it changed the trajectory
of his campaign.
I'm not sure if I'll say it is capable of something similar or weaving his visceral
grasp of many voters' fury and despair at the Israeli ethnic cleansing with the
recognition of the terror-American Jews feel in the face of rising anti-Semitism.
The problem with this is twofold.
One, we do not live in a media environment that will actually favor you for delivering an
apology.
Okay?
Two, and perhaps more important, I don't know to what extent Barack Obama agreed with
Jeremiah Wright.
Okay?
But I will say this.
Abdul to turn around and disavow comments that I have made or disavow me as a person would
go against his principles, his principles of not abiding by cancel culture and also on top
of that, his principles around separating Judaism from Zionism. Okay? That's the issue. Because
when you put that distance and you say, oh yeah, fuck, this is Songai, you're not really
going to gain a lot of favor with the people who already oppose you because they don't
oppose you because of my allegiance to Abdu'l. I'll say, they oppose Abdu'l because of
his criticism of Israel.
That's precisely the reason why that lady who wears the Israel dress everywhere around
Michigan apparently said that she was not going to vote for Abdul, not only because of his
refusal to put distance between us or sufficient distance rather, but also because Abdul does
not believe that ethno-states, including a Jewish ethno-state, has a right to exist as
an ethno-state, like they moved so quickly from, does Israel have a right to exist as
a Jewish state.
I want to know what Michelle Goldberg's comments look like, but I don't see them right now.
I wish I could see how people are reacting to it.
But if he was, it might be turning point in this race.
Obama and Trump should be the model for handling inflammatory associate.
Maybe someday Democrats will be able to get away with holding their own trolls close.
It will be a better country if they aspire to more.
Is it true that you will not play Grand Theft Auto 6 on stream of Abdul loses, yes.
hostess the soldier thing. Yes, I don't know why. I don't know why liberals highlight some
of their dumbest fucking moments historically as something to be positive about. This is
part of the reason why liberals always fucking lose. They have no decency for the most part.
Establishment Democrats have no decency. They have no backbone. They have no investment
in fighting. They constantly point to, they constantly point to like how they've distanced
themselves. Sister soldier with Bill Clinton, Jeremiah Wright with Barack Obama. Like why
is this, especially in this day and age, why is this the number one thing you hold up
as though it's a fucking positive man? It's so crazy to me. It goes back to this weird
brain rot that liberals have. It's a constant need to concede to oppositional framing. It's
a constant need to get Republicans to like you. Okay? Republicans do not like us. Republicans
despise us. They do not make a distinction between Michelle Goldberg and someone like myself.
They do not make a distinction between Abdul al-Sayed and someone like Hakim Jeffries. In their minds,
we are the enemy. In their minds, we are the opposition. And in some respects, that is a much more
honest and much more pragmatic outlook to have. Okay? Because they understand the stakes of this
game. They understand how to play politics. Liberals, on the other hand, do not want to play
the game of politics, but instead fantasize about a world that we do not live in. The West Wing world
where the best argument Trump saw were, if only I could just have a reasonable debate
with my interlocutor, then they would turn around and concede. Why would they do that?
They laugh at us all the time. They know we are always apologizing ahead of time, okay?
Okay? They know they're used to it. And as a matter of fact, they've grown comfortable
with this mentality. And this comfort yields weakness. Okay? This comfort for the opportunist
is a moment to pounce. We should take advantage of their comfort with their understanding of
how liberals operate. Because right now, broadly, they are so used to bullying the anti-Trump
coalition, and so used to whipping us around that the perfect
opportunity right now is to strike back. Okay. That's
precisely the reason why randomly every now and then you'll
see a left commentator go on Fox News or even Abdul go on
Fox News and push back and refuse to seed ground on
oppositional framing. And when they do that, the hosts are
shocked by it. Why are they shocked by it? Well, it's because they don't expect it, because they're so
comfortable, okay? They've grown fat and lazy because it doesn't take much for them to win.
In some respects, the media, the news cycle is continuing for far longer than numerous
school shootings at this point for that reason, because Abdul is not ceding to oppositional framing.
And neither am I. I'm not backing down. He's not backing down. He's putting distance,
apt distance, understandable distance. I am a streamer in California after all.
I am not in Michigan. I'm not stumping for Abdul. I'm covering the fucking news.
Just unfortunate that I happened to be the centerpiece of the news for literally the last
three weeks now. But liberals, please listen to what I have to say. I know you hate me, okay?
I know you hate me. I know you think I'm a far worse figure than Donald Trump. I know you think
in your mind that I don't want to defeat the Republicans, but I do, okay? But I do.
And I perhaps want that to happen far more than you fucking do so listen
They think you are a stupid and silly bitch
They think you are a coward if you are a liberal pundit
If you're a liberal analyst if you are a liberal media figure
Republicans crack jokes at your expense all the time. They think you suck
They hate you and not only do they hate you, but they also think you're weak
But once again
You don't have to be weak you don't have to constantly concede ahead of time you don't have to constantly apologize
You can fight back and when you do you will win we will win okay
Okay, so I'm not every lib is hutch who believes you're worse than the GOP you're right about libs except the point
I just mentioned
Yeah, I know I know most liberals don't fucking care about this and they're actually very angry
I'm talking about the pundits and the you know the consultant class for the most part
I'm not talking about like ever average liberals
They don't when changing their vote over a kid is minimal ties with her shimmer is this controversy just a mixed media manufactured high
hysteria bad framing in Islamophobia as a Michigan voter
I don't give two things about what a shock jock that I never heard of said. I only care about what
Abdullah says stands for. I'm proud to have voted for him. The primary have not read a single article
on the mainstream press or seen a single television news story about Mike Rogers.
And what he stands for, including his election denials and where's the coverage of Rogers in
the New York Times. This is a great article. I believe the show and empathy for both sides of
political divide is the way to unite. There isn't a Hassan Piker problem. There's a problem
of columnists like you taking his statements out of comics and pretending they're an issue,
but they're not. And as you admit, the rhetoric and actions on the right are orders of magnitude
worse. Piker speaks for a generation that's on the left and has been ignored, insulted
and belittled by central Democrats that have failed to prevent either of Trump's elections.
We should recognize that Democrats need to appeal to Piker fans if they're going to
have a future. There doesn't need to be a race to condemn him. Quite the opposite. Sink
of the Piker stuff. He's a podcaster. He has no power. You know who has power, Donald
Trump. You know who will continue to have power if third-way Democrats don't stop
feeding this narrative, Donald Trump. The so-called centrists need to make a decision because
general populace could not give two cents for a podcaster or his statements.
Yeah, it is generational. It is generational. And also obviously white, obviously.
I'm not going to lie, only plus six on the whites, that's got to be the women vote that's
carrying Abdul on that on that weighted adjusted uh uh plus six for uh for whites
and then as far as age goes 50 to 64 plus 16 oh my god dude oh my god the lead poison generation
all my god all my god gen Xers all my fucking god every time bro
it's like a blip
it is impossible not to notice
this fucking
insane generation
that is going to
literally
sign off our death warrant
okay
it is a death sentence that they're signing on to every single time
I don't understand it is the lead poison generation gen X all my fucking God 50 to 64. It's always a statistical anomaly. Okay, even the boomers are like, yeah, honestly, this is kind of fucked up. This Trump shit is crazy gen lead generation X gen led is literally like, no, I want what's worse for everyone.
How the fuck did this happen?
How did this happen? Why did this happen? I don't understand.
God, their brains are so fried. Anyway, here's AOC.
all of us talk about is how we're going to make their lives more affordable.
Thank you.
So if you moderate, you're going to be in with very much energy, I think it's up.
America's most formidable Cold War enemy led, yeah, all right, speaking of led bullets,
munitions, back to the Iran war.
29th really with the president and the Trump administration in recent weeks
wanting to shift this war from a military one to an economic one. As for
what the president is saying, we just heard that he spoke with Fox News today
and he has told Fox News that the United States will respond to the
retaliation from Iran on Jordan and the UAE. The president saying that we're
going to hit them hard of referring to the Iranians and that there will
be a response. But just to break down exactly what happened here, US officials said that
the US military had struck Iranian military targets to prevent the deployment of sea mines
in the street of her moons. We were told that essentially struck two Iranian launchers
on Iran's La Rock Island after IRG forces were observed preparing to launch rockets
carrying sea mines. Now, Tasman News Agency, which we know is affiliated with Iran's
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps reported that a drone conducted the strike and that
two people were killed and two others were wounded.
Iran said that they fired missiles toward U.S. military targets in Jordan and the UAE
in retaliation for those strikes, both Jordan and the UAE saying that they had intercepted
those missiles.
Something I think is notable here is clearly the goal of the U.S. with these strikes
was really to prevent them from further laying sea mines in the strait of her moose.
that remind you was just a couple of days ago, that the president declared that the
Strait of Hormuz had been free of mines. And he had said last week at the time that Iran
has been notified that any ship or boat placing new mines will be immediately and systematically
destroyed.
I will also note that the U.S. Central Command sent in a statement that this was limited
and precise action against the IRGC for their mind-laying operations and what they
were trying to do. It's unclear, though, what the president means in this new
Fox News he did saying essentially that there will be a response to retaliation from Iran.
Very much not in keeping with what the strategy from the U.S. has been in recent weeks.
A chance to see more escalation here, but very much unclear if that's actually what's
going to happen.
I do want to read from what we heard from U.S. Central Command.
They issued a statement on this saying that U.S. forces took limited precise action
against IRGC, mind-laying forces posing an imminent threat in the Strait of Ramuz.
In essence, Oran created the threat and the US military eliminated it to protect civilian
uh, mariners, commercial shipping and
35% off gift to subs is on focus up.
Let's go.
Piker Broadcasting Service, the People's Broadcasting Service sponsored by you the people, for you
the people, ladies and gentlemen, um, while there's no commerce taking place in the
Strait of Hormuz, commerce is still alive and well here at the Hassanabe broadcast.
We're at level two, 35% off five plus gifted subs.
It is September.
those oilers in. We already know there's plenty of you in here. There are thousands of you making
over a hundred thousand dollars, which means there are thousands of you potentially making over
a million dollars. Okay, get those oilers ready. Get those gift subs out and gift a subscription
to a lucky Hasanabi head. And at level 10, we carry the freaking flame.
Live in absurdity, think of the 10 gifted subs, oh, also Trump lied about the missiles
being intercepted and so does Sancom.
A missile from Iran managed to get past US air defenses in Moa Fakh, salty airbase and
hit a hangar.
Trump again claimed that all but one missile was intercepted, ABC said it was multiple
and that the missile that got through turned out to not be targeting anything important.
Reality and aircraft hangar at Alsalti was struck.
All right.
Also, a tanker has been struck three times while attempting to transit the Oman route
in the Strait of Hormuz, so that's not good either.
We're a level 7 hype trend, ladies and gentlemen, 35% off, 5% plus gifted subs.
And MQ9 was also downed, the RGC just downed their second MQ9 in the last 14 hours.
It is, I think, yeah, I think 100.
Eventually, we'll hit 100. This, of course, is marking the six-month anniversary
half-year anniversary of Operation Epic Fury, Operation Epstein's Fury, billions and billions
of dollars so far burning in the Strait of Hormuz, in the Gulf, all of your healthcare is being
deployed out there. Breaking, US Army launched almost 96 128 MIM 104F PAC-3 MSC surface air
missiles from his Patriot Pactir air defense batteries in Jordan tonight against Iranian ballistic
missiles. They launched three to four interceptors as each of the 32 Iranian ballistic missiles.
This would mean the US just expended roughly 10% of his remaining Pactir interceptor stockpile.
It is over.
So what I think is really interesting about this tit for tat that's taking place is that
America must have thought it was worthy to strike Iran, because America knows it doesn't have
enough missiles in its stockpiles, enough PAC-3s in its stockpiles to sufficiently defend its bases.
I suspect that given that Iran said it would readjust its tempo. What's a PAC-3? PAC-3s
These are Patriot missiles.
They are Interceptor missiles, oftentimes deployed to, in the direction of one ballistic
missile to ensure that it is intercepted.
And we have depleted our munitions.
So they're five to six million a pop, yes.
So what's interesting about this is that America clearly does not have enough, right?
We don't have enough.
We genuinely do not have enough Pact 3 missiles.
We've started Panic Shipping Pact 2s to our allies as well, which obviously have a lower
interception rate.
MSE is the hit-to-kill iteration going to be partially downgraded the airburst in
2028 with ACE
Their targeting capabilities are
Their their interception targeting capabilities are worse than pack three missiles even though they've been I think like retrofitted
They've upgraded the pack two missiles as well
It's a lot of money and we don't have a lot of them that remain
So what I suspect is
is that if the American blockade and the American secondary sanctions actually started causing
too much grief inside of Iran, if it became too much of a domestic issue, I suspect the
hardliners would start increasing the pressure campaign by taking control over the tempo
of and the pacing of the war once again and start peppering Jordan and maybe even
Israel.
Now, I don't know if they'll do this, but that's my suspicion.
Some of these attacks on carriers, on vessels that are transiting oil from the Omani coastline
and the southern coastline are getting attacked because Iran is still trying to maintain
militant posture to show the rest of the world that they are actually controlling the Shrediform
moves. Here is senior Pentagon officials becoming so indoctrinated by Israel that they now use
their most infamous expressions which catastrophically backfired on them in Gaza. Why it matters,
the plan which developed over the past week by U.S. Central Command and supported by
Secretary Pete Hegseth had not been approved by Trump ahead of this weekend's exchange fire
with Iran but he could green light it after the new escalation. The U.S. official said the idea
behind the plan is to reduce risk of Iranian attacks on oil tankers. U.S. Navy ships in
Air Force aircraft to mow the lawn as this person put it. Nice.
All right, let's hear from Tritoparcy. The, oh, also UKMTO confirmed the incident
approximately 17 nautical miles east of Kasab, Oman. According to UKMTO, a tanker transiting
the Tritahormos outbound was struck by three unknown projectiles, which is crazy.
Not one, not two, but three means that they have precise targeting capabilities.
The location and timing codes I would automatic identification system data for maritime traffic
show in the Saudi Arabian flag very large crude carrier VLCC sitter slowing dramatically
before coming to an apparent stop in the same area.
Are we actually running out of missiles?
Are they just saying is that we can pay the 1.5 billion for the military or trillion
for the military?
No, we are actually running out of missiles because it's not our guys that are saying they were running out of missiles
It's the CSIS that's literally counting the missiles
It's not
It's not a budget issue necessarily we already have so much we're gonna give so much money to the defense contractors
sometimes $500 million are given to a contractor and zero artillery shells are
produced in the process that's a real thing look it up and we still work with
these contractors anyway we still keep awarding them contracts regardless
awesome Iran's response to this US attack reinforces the
the terrorist secretion, it is sought to establish the war in response to what the U.S. described
as limited and precise strikes on Lurk Island. Iran said it hit U.S. base in Jordan, UAE,
and downed at Mark Q9. While reportedly continuing target ships using
Hormuz routes, it rejects. Trump is now threatening Iran again, saying we're going to hit them
hard. So far, this episode reinforced the broader pattern of the war.
Washington struggled to find military options that actually improved its position. When
the U.S. attacks, Iran seeks to hit back in a broader and more constitutional
way confronting Trump with a choice between climbing further up the escalation ladder
or absorbing Iran's response. That is the escalation trap Tehran has been trying to
create for Trump. At this juncture, Trump wants to avoid a wider conflict to keep things
relatively stable, heading into the midterms. Iran, by contrast, has every incentive to
deny him that stability and demonstrate that neither the status quo nor further US
attacks aimed at weakening his leverage over Hormuz will come without mounting costs.
So like I said, Donald Trump thinks that he can keep this as a holding pattern.
Trump thinks that the economic blockade and the secondary sanctions are actually doing
the job. And if they continue with this pressure campaign, then ultimately Iran will buckle
under the pressure. Iran will cave under the pressure and Iran will give in to America's
demands somehow. However, like I said, I assume that if Iran feels too much pressure, they
They could potentially accelerate.
Put the screws in.
It's quite stunning, really, César de Parse.
Only a week ago, Scott Besen said sanctions would make military action unnecessary.
Six days later, the U.S. bombed Iran again, and now Axios reveals that all along the
Pentagon was preparing for a periodic bombing of Iran to prevent it from suppressing
traffic in the street of Ormuz. It has not worked. It has not worked up until this moment.
This concept, this tit for tat has literally failed. Why are we doing the same thing over
and over again? Oh my God. It's so fucking dumb. You don't have to be a military analyst
or a misal artist or a situation monitor to recognize that for the past six months, this has been the plan and for the past six months, Iran has literally established primacy over the Strait of Hormuz.
What are we doing?
And in the process, the energy markets have suffered. There's tremendous volatility.
There's fertilizer shortage with a crisis in agriculture that is imminent.
And on top of that, the only thing that we have established is that we, one, cannot militarily
dominate a middling middle power. And two, we cannot protect our allies, our security partners,
Or even our own bases in our military asses in the region and last but not least
We don't have enough munitions to defend even the only ally that matters
Motherfucking Israel
All the while Israel is still in the corner going come on. Come on. Let's do it again
Actually, even they stopped chirping. Have you guys noticed that? I don't think it's because of the election by the way because
attacking Iran would be very favorable for Benjamin Netanyahu, and yet there
he's no longer demanding we attack Iran. Have you guys noticed that? Have you
noticed that Israel shut the fuck up? Like, when has Israel ever shut the fuck
up? When has Israel ever turned around and said, you know what, it's fine that
you're no longer killing Iranians. That's the number one thing that Israeli
society unites on killing iranians killing muslims right broadly killing
lebanese killing iranians killing pauses they love that shit okay so why are they
not demanding that america kill more iranians perhaps even they fucking
realized that we don't have sufficient defenses to protect israel
What does this tell us? First, the administration is apparently giving up on solving the issue
militarily, economically, or diplomatically. Instead, permanent warfare is needed to manage
the problem. Make no mistake, periodically, Obama country is the fighter for ever war,
says Shrida.
In fact, the U.S. officials even quoted by Axios, calling it mowing of the lawn.
This is the Israeli strategy of never making peace, never winning the war, but just keep
bombing the country surrounding it to ensure they never gain the capacity to deter Israel.
It's what Israel has been doing in Gaza and Lebanon for years.
the previous administrations, Israel tried to sell war with Iran to the U.S. and conceded
that military strikes would not knock out Iran's nuclear program but will require periodic
return to kinetic action to keep the program in check.
The U.S. rejected the plan precisely because it didn't want to be in a permanent state
of war with Iran.
Now Trump's Secretary of War is pushing it.
What are we doing?
So we lost and have no real plan?
That was six months ago.
Yes, we lost and yes, we have no real plan from six months ago.
What is this for what is worth if they know it's a Russian sub okay but we are usually
able to track those across oceans if you truly identify that it's a much more likely Israeli
dolphin to class nuclear tip sub those are the ones built to evade American early warning
systems.
There's an identify okay I don't know about all this.
check the bio law thoroughbred noticr yeah okay yeah that's uh that's a
little crazy no I do not believe Israel is threatening to nuke the United
States of America dog if they were a nuke someone it would be Iran like I
I don't think they're, I don't think they're threatening to nuke literally the only country on the planet that is still willing to
To cooperate with them and give them everything they want
Because it's run by a bunch of cackling hyenas
Who care more about israel's foreign policy than whatever the fuck is going on at home
Why would they kill the only people on the planet that care more about israeli foreign policy anybody else?
No, not india. No america
America is the number one pro-israel country on the planet. What are we talking about as far as our government goes? We are
The number one nobody comes close
Because they're crazy as fuck my dude, okay guys sure
Yes, some crank with a noticer in their bio claims that there are Israeli dolphin
in nuclear submarines. If they were going to New America, they'd use Jericho. If they
were going to New America and the East Coast, they would use Jericho. They wouldn't have
to use the dolphins. Dolphins are for the West Coast. If they really wanted to nuke every
part of America, their Jericho systems already reached most of America with the exception
of California. As Trita pointed out, their dolphin submarines, which are armed with
nuclear armaments which they got from Germany! Fuck you, Germany!
Can't reach any part of the continental United States.
Breaking, St. Common Outs is a Delta Black Hawk program where qualified Jordanian
citizens can temporarily store a helicopter in their home and receive
hangar fees up to $200 a month. The moves are expected to reduce loss in the region with
minimal expense. Yeah, someone said dolphin classes diesel has no
rage to do any of that. Wait, really? That's shocking. What good is a
fucking nuclear submarine if you can't even, you know, sail it around all the
way to wherever the fuck you want to wait what
I'm going to go to the next one.
Which I got that wrong too. I got that we're wrong too because you know, I have a personal policy of like, you know, whatever
You know the public statements of like the American government
Yes, something like that. You just kind of believe the opposite and more or the less, you know, in most cases you're gonna be right
Yeah, whatever the Atlanta council says is yeah rushers doing rushes doing the opposite
Yeah, right
But they were jumping up and down the Biden admin was jumping up and down saying yeah
is going to invade Ukraine and I'm like, okay, it's crazy because they will never let us live that
fucking hell down. And you can be wrong all the time. If you're wrong, uh, uh, in line with the
American government, they can be wrong in 99% of the time. If we're wrong 1% of the time,
they will never let us live it down. It's crazy. Yeah. Taking the oppositional position
of the American State Department or any government really, like most governments,
of course, they're lying all the fucking time. At least you own it with your respect. I did.
I did. And I changed. I changed my policy. I used to, what did I used to say?
I used to take pride in never assuming that foreign adversaries, adversaries in their
leadership, or even the American leadership, will behave in a totally irrational manner,
that there is still a logical through line behind their decision making, and I was wrong.
Okay, we live in a different world.
Donald Trump has proven that I'm wrong time and time again on that front.
It's just funny because Zelensky also didn't think that Russia would invade, but that's
besides the point.
You assumed realism when liberal international theory was right.
I mean, can you even call this liberal international theory?
Yeah, probably not.
So in retrospect, yeah.
I wonder if there's a political commentator in China who claimed the US wasn't dumb enough
to go to war with Iran and now still get shit for it.
That'd be really funny.
The Hassanabi of China.
It was like, guys, come on, America's not that fucking stupid.
They know Iran can lock down 21 nautical miles.
It's one of the most consequential choke points that Iran absolutely has the capabilities and
deterrence on who would be dumb enough to do that.
Come on, even Americans are not that fucking Israel brain.
Then he also said that Putin wouldn't do it because X, Y and Z would happen and it
would be bad for him and then all that should happen.
Yes no one cares about the additional parts that I said.
Yes I said Putin is bad, not mad.
If he were to sign off on a permanent military occupation of a country with like 40 million
people, it would be disastrous for both parties involved, it would be disastrous for Russia.
They would not be able to maintain a permanent military occupation for decades or whatever.
And I was wrong. Boy was I wrong. Okay. Boy was I wrong. I've been right this entire time.
Nobody ever talks about that.
It turns out Putin is both bad and mad.
It's the mad man.
The first flow of global commerce.
In a message carried by Iran's state broadcaster, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps called
the U.S. sanctions, quote, a strategic and deadly mistakes, referring to the actions,
not sanctions.
Joining us right now is CNN political and global affairs commentator Sabrina Singh.
It's good to see you Sabrina.
So we now have this new round of strikes, the first in a month, the first real escalation
if you will, on the military side.
The straight up form is still also not really open, but this has become what this entire
focus and fight is about now.
So where are we?
I think where we are right now is that you are seeing kinetic action after about
a month long pause.
We know that the Trump administration is pivoting more to economic pain rather than military
pain.
But I think you are going to see from time and again, as long as a full-scale war does
not reignite, because I don't think either side wants that, you are going to see these
tit-for-tat strikes.
The U.S. military, the Navy is going to respond, and it's a defensive strike when
they saw that these allegedly, the IRGC was going to lay mines in the Strait
of Hormuz, and then Iran retaliated.
But I don't think what you're going to see is either side wanting to return to a full-scale
war.
I want to lean on your experience of working in the Pentagon as the Deputy Press Secretary.
There's this new reporting from the Washington Post that military leaders are warning Secretary
Hegseth against extending Iran war operations.
Here's some of the reporting.
The warnings detailed for Hegseth by the heads of the Army, Navy and Air Force and
the four-star commanders overseeing U.S. operations throughout Europe, Asia and Latin
appear in the August 14th edition of the Secretary of Defense orders book these
people said and this is military leader back over a directive that troops
deployed in the Middle East remain through September but some others remain
into 2027 one person wait here's why Army Secretary Dan Driscoll resigned
Driscoll brought up concerns the administration surrounding Army
transformation readiness and Hexas blocking those efforts specifically by
firing the generals who were responsible according to a source familiar with Driscoll�s decision.
Mike Pryzner says, �Also, news broke last week of Hexeth considering a 2028 presidential
run and Driscoll will likely be working for Hexeth in that primary.�
Yeah, there's also, there's also the whole Pete Keg's breath is, is attempting or planning
on running for president, which I think is insane.
But again, it's, it shows the weakness of the Republican party outside of for Vance.
Sorry, did I say a Hegze?
I apologize for Vance.
Driscoll will be working for Vance.
Um, did I read that wrong?
I don't know what I read.
Okay. My brain is fried. Um,
what did I say?
I said, Hey, Zip. Okay. Uh,
I forgot what else I was going to say. You guys fucked me up by correcting me,
but it's good that you corrected me. Oh no,
Kegsbreath is gonna be running for president.
Yes, no, no, no, Kegs, guys.
No, no, no.
Kegsbreath is running for president, for sure.
Oh no, I'm right about that.
Driscoll is gonna be running against Kegsbreath
alongside, I mean, not alongside Vance,
but probably working for Vance.
Yeah.
Please stop, no.
No, no, no, that is true.
When you read out my chats, it makes my day
and I always tell my one friend.
That's funny.
Yeah, no, no, that's a given.
That is real, that's real.
Look, NBC News reported on it.
Pete Hexeth is talking about a possible
run for president in 2020 sources say, yeah.
Yeah, he did an event in Iowa.
So, I think it's because, listen, these guys are all sharks, right? We know that.
These guys are all sharks, and they smell blood in the water. They recognize the
weakness of the current administration post Trump, they recognize that once Trump is out
of the picture, really anyone could try and run for the seat for the top job.
And so they're all, you know, making their moves right now.
You got JD Vance, you got Marco Rubio and now Hexeth also has some ambition.
Olivia Rodrigo still is confirmed to be still a Hassanabi head and affiliates.
How is that possible?
My dear friend Olivia Rodrigo thinks I'm a great dad, oh because of Matt Leib?
That doesn't mean, that does not mean that she's a Hassanabi head still.
She might be, but I don't think she's publicly showing support.
That's cool though.
John Kiriakouko is talking about why he disappeared.
Might explain why he won't come on the broadcast.
It's gonna be $10 million for a deal like,
like a notice for a condition similar to what John has agreed to.
I wouldn't take it.
Maybe I'm stupid, but I mean,
if I were maybe I might do it cause I might be done,
but I'm, you know, I mean, I'm not done.
Well, you're your own man.
And listen, I get why John did it.
the federal government, they destroyed his life. I get it. You know, you came out, you came out
of prison, he couldn't get a job at McDonald's because he's a fella. I get it. I completely get
it. I understand. And I'm not mad at him. I feel sorry for him. Me too. I'm not mad at all.
I mean, honestly, I'm a little bit disgusted, which isn't the same thing.
No, what what I'm just in the same way that like, you know, when I step on a on my cat's poo because he doesn't go in the litter box all the time
I'm not mad at the cat. I'm not mad at the poo. I'm not mad at my foot. So what happened John?
John Kiriyaku got the bag and and he's gone. He's done
But I'm not mad at myself. I'm not mad. I'm just remember the CIA guy the former CIA guy who went to prison
He was going super viral on Tiktok. He went insanely viral on Tiktok. Anyway, I was trying
to get him on the stream and he was just like being weirdly evasive. His team was telling
us one thing and then he was publicly saying another and it's interesting because like
publicly he would then also show support as well and I don't know what the fuck happened
but I guess he disappeared or something. I can have dinner with anybody I want and
And I'm not asking Benjamin Netanyahu's permission to do it.
I'm pretty sure it's his team that hates you.
I don't know.
Yeah, one of your haters told him out of the show and he responded to that.
Am I really banned Corbin from coming on?
Somebody has to make the iron and steel this country with the people on the top are
disconnected from what we know on the ground. Oh, cause he's, he's cooking every time he
goes on, right? He was just on TYT. Yeah. He, he just won't come on, uh, my stream for
some fucking weird reason. I don't know why he likes Tucker. He likes Abdul.
That's it. No, what I told him is that the last time I talked to him, I've not
talked to him in a long time. The last thing I talked to him, as the problem that you have is
that you're surrounded by people who tell you what you want to hear and not the people who are
going to tell you what you need to hear and you need to stop burning bridges because one day when
Hollywood has used you up, which it will, no one's going to be there for you if you keep
doing that stuff. Anyway, so these are his like former podcast co-hosts I guess that are
bitter about his absence person familiar with this assessment saying that I suspect you got blacklisted by what
I got blacklisted by cnn and ms now when it was there like a like a podcast blacklist out there as well
There's a there's a secret podcast Illuminati
They get blacklisted by cia I got blacklisted by England the United Kingdom
major breaking three finds Dwayne Keffey D. Davis guilty of orchestrating murder of
two-part score. This is so pathetic. She has enlisted Miriam Adelson to speak with Mr.
Trump on her behalf. How much influence does this Israeli-American billionaire have in
our politics? The acting attorney general for civil rights at the Justice Department
serving under Attorney General Todd Blanche, Harmeet Dillon, has told people in her orbit
she may quit if she's not promoted to Deputy Attorney General, and would only stay if she
respects the alternative pick she has enlisted Mary Maddelson to speak with Mr. Trump on
her behalf.
This is another one of my ops by the way.
She's insane.
She's an insane person.
God, how the fuck do we get here, man?
Overall message was that the Iran operation is now too much for too long.
What do you think of this?
What does this mean?
Yeah, so what the S-Dob does is essentially give the Secretary a picture, a placemat of
what forces are available, what fighter aircraft, what warships are available to the Secretary
to be able to surge to different combat and command regions.
In this reporting, what we're seeing is that three combatant commanders for Asia, Europe
and Latin America and the service secretary of the Navy non-concurred with the secretary's
recommendation to extend forces in the Middle East.
And that's because of a few reasons.
One, the service is objecting to it because this impacts their training and readiness
for the force, for the Navy.
And the combatant commanders for Latin America, for Asia, for Europe have seen their
assets being pulled away from the region, like a carrier strike group from the Indo-Pacific,
a Marine unit, a Patriot battery.
And all of that means that they do not have enough assets to protect their area of responsibility,
which is what they're in charge of.
So that's why you saw these different leaders non-conquer.
What I was really surprised by was the Pentagon's statement saying that this happens constantly,
They're constantly non-concurrs from combatant commanders or service secretaries.
When I was at the Pentagon, we did have that happen.
We did have some non-concurrs happen, but when you have a service and three combatant
commanders in a meeting with the secretary non-concur, that is pretty rare.
What does it mean, though?
How does it impact Secretary Hegseth's decision making?
Well, the secretary could take their non-concurs and decide to say, okay, we're not going
to extend our troops for this amount of time.
We're going to bring people back within two months, three months.
I mean, of course you saw with the Lincoln being extended multiple times, you know,
nearly 200 days without seeing land, over 200 days without seeing land.
So the secretary could make adjustments to the force posture in the region.
But the reality is that this war is demanding so much capability, so much time, so many
assets that as a result other combatant commanders and the service, particularly the Navy, is really
feeling it when it comes to their readiness and their areas of responsibility that they
have to protect.
Yeah.
Sabrina, it's great to see you.
Thanks so much for that.
Please.
Thank you, President Trump.
Is the resumption of strikes in Iran part of a limited campaign?
Bro, am I crazy?
I feel like the president is washed.
He hasn't even condemned the Sompiger honestly, I don't even know if he cares about anti-Semitism
or not anymore.
It's been weeks dude.
It's been weeks.
He's so fucking washed.
He's already, it feels like he's already in the lame duck period.
We haven't even hit the fucking, we haven't even hit the midterms yet.
the
might want
The these people are incredibly dangerous
a bull
Who you know, I work with it CNN. I know a bull
His positions on
Israel and foreign policy are insane
They're not reasonable reactions to anything
But some Democrats are gonna say that we should condition mail to military aid that you know
Israel's gone too far in Gaza and in the West Bank and in Lebanon
We're gonna put some conditions on you. I guess a defensible position if you're a Democrat
That's not up those position
There are people who say we shouldn't be paying for any of the
military
You know, we shouldn't we shouldn't be in giving out to a now. I think that's
It's understandable, but I think it's indepensible because it's not charity.
We're building a strong defense sector here and Israel is judging a lot of Western interests
in that region.
But I can get why you would say no more A, they got to pay their own way.
That's not Abdul's position.
Abdul's position is a total and complete arms embargo against the state of Israel,
including dissents of weapons.
Look at his face.
This is terrifying.
Guys.
Guys, this is terrifying.
What's a little genocide?
What do you mean?
They just did a little genocide, bro.
They're just doing a fucking seven front war with our weapons.
They obviously need defense.
He's on the verge of crying.
I'm telling you, bro, if Democrats fought this hard for the working class, if it's pundits
fought this hard for the working class, there would never be another Republican elected
in office.
Do you understand?
Can you imagine a world where these guys get as animated about issues that are important
for the American working class as they do about defending Israel.
I said what I said.
If Democrats defended the working class as hard as they defend Israel, this would no
longer be an issue, we would never have another Republican get elected in the office.
He's like, what?
Abdul subscribes to the arms embargo for Israel?
A position that is increasingly more popular?
How what?
Immediately after, uh, sector armored driscoll's resignation and deputy
undersecretary, Army Dave Fitzgerald is expected to resign this week.
What?
Is this good?
chat is this good I can't tell anyway let's see what else you had to say that's an insane
position that says if Israel wants to pay for interceptors to stop a rocket coming from
Iran or coming from Hezbollah or coming from us, an interceptor, we should deny them the
right to buy the interceptors to knock down.
Okay.
What if Iran wanted some interceptors?
What if Russia wanted some interceptors?
Do we sell them interceptors?
No.
Who gives a fuck if Israel demands interceptors like they're willing to pay for it?
I don't care.
They did a genocide, the fuck do you mean?
They need to be held accountable, they need to be reigned in.
Arka's going in Israeli, children, women, men, babies.
That's an insane position.
And by the way, it is not an insane position at all as a matter of fact.
It might be the only way to restrain Israel as a matter of fact.
i didn't see you taking a position uh... uh... on the on uh... the israeli
genocide during the
duration of the genocide
uh... you didn't i didn't see you demanding that uh... hummus get an iron
dome
and here you say that
where was the uh... intense
calls for hummus to get iron down there's babies
all that's right you said dead gaza baby dead gaza baby at well you were
laughing that's that was your position
And it's me because that's you know, Barack Obama was a part of creating that iron dome of Barack Obama part of creating those interceptors.
Barack Obama thought that the Israeli people weren't such a tough neighbor.
They needed to be able to knock down rockets.
So you're talking you're smarter than Barack Obama.
Oh my God.
Oh my god, this is the worst. This is the worst argument I've ever heard bro. What the fuck? I cannot believe they gave this guy
$100 million Jeff Bezos gave this man $100 million Jeff Bezos like you are so smart
You are the best servant we have
Keep serving those hot takes
You have better ideas about foreign policy than Barack Obama, and you want to de-plug,
and defund, and take away Israel's path to the world's shoes.
ability to defend themselves.
In or return to full scale war, and how will you respond to Israel?
Democraticism mounts over a song for your comments.
It is kind of wild that our politics was critical of John Ossoff here.
APAC literally makes a press release about how they're going to support the
Republican candidate Michigan, but Democrats still don't feel the need to purge
their influence from the party.
This is the enemy calls come from inside the house.
Folks talking about some popular use of Joe Rogan to the left or something.
Corporate Dems sure do hate winning more than they hate to pretend Trump.
Wow.
When is Van Joe's coming on stream if he's a real malice?
Yeah, if he was a real malice he would.
I guess he's a fake malice after all.
Yeah, they're a failed nation.
They've got 350% inflation. They have no currency. They're not paying their soldiers.
Their leaders are largely dead. Their Navy is gone. Their Air Force is gone. Their surveillance equipment is almost entirely gone.
That doesn't mean we won't smack them. We'll see what happens.
Yeah, this is a classic.
This is old. This is all intentional. It's Hamas' plan. The problem is that their plan is essentially to spread this propaganda
throughout the internet by using...
Sorry guys. Alright, let's go to RASCAM. Get yourself together there, my friend.
The launching of missiles from desktop...
Get yourself together!
...plated urban areas, like the Gaza Strip.
It essentially...
They want... they want people to see what is happening.
I'm sorry.
That's alright, Ari. I want to get to this politically cynical move.
This is all in...
Why did he throw up in his mouth twice?
That's how much he loves Israel, bro.
No, he loves Israel so much that he was choking up thinking about how much its honor has
has been tarnished by these Hamasnik pro-Palestine contekers on TikTok.
JD is mad that Abdul brought up his family.
I always talk about my wife, my gran-
Wait, just keep families out of this though.
What the fuck do you mean?
The Republican strategy against Abdul has literally been to docks every person that has ever been around him.
Okay?
What the fuck do you mean?
His sister, his mom, like...
Hello?
Are you aware of what your party's doing, dumbass?
Also, it's not like he attacked your wife, he attacked you for being a racist asshole.
Yeah, JD Vance thanked the kid who said, normalize Indian hate, dude.
JD Vance defended, JD Vance defended the honor of the Doge kid who literally tweeted out,
normalize Indian hate.
Your wife is Indian, your kids are Indian, and you are such a hate monger that you
have to literally disavow them on a daily basis.
You are spineless.
This is also another reason why I said it's good to have backbone
Even if people don't agree with your position overall you never want to be like JD Vance. You never want to be apologizing
For your your your wife and your children
Nasty is disgusting. I'm fairly certain even Republicans that otherwise would like JD Vance see that kind of stuff and go off gross
Go a fucking spine JD
Yeah, the Heritage America stuff didn't even last a year, huh?
When you have people who say, my ethnic group deserves something and yours doesn't, that
ethnic group is good and this ethnic group is bad, it's how you erode the very foundations
of commonality, all the roads lead to creedal nationalism.
various people in my family. It's like, dude, if you want to attack me, like feel free to
attack me on the vice president of the United States. But like, I don't know who his wife
is. I'm sure she's a lovely person. Just keep families out of this stuff. And what, what
I find so just odd about the guy is anytime that else I had says something crazy or
something debatable or something we push back on, he says, well, if you don't like this,
you're a white supremacist. If you don't like Sharia law in the United States,
you're a white supremacist. He's always talking about my wife, my grandmother,
various people in my family. It's like, dude, if you want to attack me, like feel free to
attack me on the vice president of the United States. But like, I don't know who his wife
is. I'm sure she's a lovely person. Just keep families out of this stuff. And what
I find so just odd about the guy is anytime that else I had said something crazy or
something debatable or something we push back on, he says, well, if you don't like
this, you're a white supremacist. If you don't like Sharia law in the United
States, you're a.
I really hate his style.
I hate his demeanor.
He just sounds like such a pussy.
Like me, me, me, me, me, me, me.
We just, I don't know.
Can we have a normal conversation?
Erm, erm, actually.
Like shut the fuck up.
You are such a bitch, bro.
Oh my God.
At least Trump is caddy.
He has a, he has a pen shot for drama.
But at least there's something there. He can be telegenic. He used to be. He's not anymore. He's, you know, gotten too old. He's lost the step.
But like, J.D. Vance is the liberal groper. I mean, he literally is the liberal groper. He picked up the worst qualities.
He picked up the worst qualities of groperism, the constant need to agitate towards like a, like a white nationalist dystopia.
even though also just like Groypers, his family is very diverse.
Most of the time the Groypers themselves are diverse, and JD's situation, his family is.
And he also has the Ivy League twang, the annoying mealy-mouthed, like smug, elitist way of speaking,
where it's like, erm, erm.
I don't know if you guys know this, but Abdul
He's Muslim
Erm
And I hate it. He oh, do you know who else talks like this fucking Palmer lucky if you guys ever heard Palmer lucky speak?
They have the exact same speech pattern, bro. I don't know what it is
I don't know what it is about these fucking losers the the the Neo tech feudalist
Losers the way they communicate. I don't know why they all sound the same
Mohamad El Sayed is going to be on Caitlyn Collins in 10 minutes. How Palmer sounds?
And they're early 20s, right? Then they're early 30s. Just, just by.
Oh, forget, what are you talking about 20s? Look at this, look at this mainstream NPC.
Kids should be having, should be having kids when they're, when they're in their teens.
That's when they're, that's when they're supposed to have them. And you could argue
that maybe there's a reason to stretch it out a little bit. But if we're just talking about
physical ability and depth of well of energy, let's not be politically correct. Let's just admit
you're supposed to be having kids in your 16, 17, 18 and be done by the time in your 20s so that
you can close your eyes and tell me that's not JD Van speaking. Also, any guy that looks like
this should never say that you know you should be impregnated as a 16 year old. I just assume
you think that anyway, but you probably should still shy away from saying it out loud.
And your kids working on the farm by the time you're in your 40s. Yeah. I mean it's a, I mean,
I regret not having kids even at the age of 33. I regret not having them earlier because I'm
I'm like, geez, this one's been so much easier
when I was younger.
I've been with my wife since we were 15, though.
So it's a lot easier for me.
You would be like, oh, but Palmer,
how do you notice the right person?
I'm like, geez, we should've just obviously had kids
when we were 16.
It wouldn't work.
Connor pointing out something very interesting
about Canis Owens.
So many memories that make me smile now today's our anniversary with her husband by the way before God our family friends 831 19 the honorable George and can his farmer oh
My god she mourned in the wrong husband she mourned in the work husband. I'm still blocked by the way
Do you think guys like Palmer looking shitty vans are demographic for this over? Yes. Yes.
Yes. 100%. Yes. No, that is literally all these guys watch. I assume they just turn
on youtube and watch asmongold videos. Like this is this is exactly primo content is primo
content for jdvanspalmerlucky that kind of like dark enlightenment dipshit. Have you
seen this and is this real? I took this photo and we all had gay sex after. Jesus Christ
Dude. Again, conservatives, man, they're fucking insane.
They're insane.
Conservatives of cosplay as real men, but have never done anything physical in their entire lives.
Yeah.
I don't know why conservatives, they have.
Such a
psychosexual obsession.
We have the straight of hormones and extremely good, you know, we're taking over many, many
ships that got through last night, as you know.
Several military leaders have reportedly told Secretary Head Staff that a prolonged large
scale operation there, weakens our ability to confront threats elsewhere, including the
homeland.
Well, number one, we have nothing else in the world.
Number two, we're very respected.
Nobody else would be crazy enough to do it.
Number three, we have so much ammunition and munitions as they like to call it all over
the world that we can always take from if we want.
We have tremendous and unlimited amounts of mid-grade and older stuff.
not good. Probably not the best thing to tell people when they're asking you about our depleted
munitions stockpile of advanced weapons. What do you mean? We got so many bullets. Do you
know how many bullets we have? We will shoot at the Iranian. We will shoot at their midrange
ballistic munitions with our bullets, if necessary.
It's also very powerful, unlimited amounts.
We're only talking about what we call the elite, the elite stuff.
And even that word, very good shape, but we can always take from other sources.
But I don't think we're going to need it because nobody's going to mess with us.
Nobody.
Any moment the last witnesses are set to touch. Oh, I haven't touched the Lindsey Clancy stuff with a 10-foot pole
And I'm too afraid to say anything on it I feel like everyone it's another every
Every now and again. There's like a story
That breaks people's brains and now I think it's a Lindsey Clancy story
Part of it is because I don't think people understand like postpartum depression
Like that's a real thing which is very strange because like that's always been a real thing
It's been in movies like it's not
Like I thought it was common knowledge, right?
and
And it's very weird that people are like no it doesn't doesn't fucking matter bro. Just shut up
up. There's like, there's also, there's also all these other aspects of the story. Like,
there's things that just don't add up as far as like whether or not she did it
or if the husband was potentially involved.
But it's turned into another like Amber Heard situation, I think, where
There are a lot of people that look for like a polarizing story that they lean into.
And I don't, for the record, I don't know if there's enough evidence that the husband
is involved at all.
I'm just saying that there was suspicions of it.
But what I find very, what I find very strange is like, like what is the, the argument is
what?
Like what are the, what are the people saying that like she actually lied about having
postpartum depression?
All of chat right now.
Yeah.
Like is that what they're saying?
like, I truly don't understand what the argument is.
Dude, shut up about it.
We live in a health-broken environment.
The common person can't understand
postpartum depression, domestic issues, or disputes.
Don't let the professionals in helping professions
do the responsible commentary.
Don't.
I think it's because it's such a heinous crime
that people don't care even if it's
postpartum depression or not, which kind of doesn't make sense.
Her life is over anyway, like, isn't she completely paralyzed?
She killed her children and is completely paralyzed and, and don't talk about it.
Bro, she strangled the kids.
I'm not even, oh, they're saying her husband did it on TikTok.
Is that what it is?
There's, okay.
So there's people who are, there's some people who are saying the husband
might have done it.
And then there are some people who are saying that, or her defense is saying that she had postpartum depression and therefore she shouldn't be considered guilty.
And she's the only person who said, who came out and said she did it.
Postpartum psychosis, not depression, sorry.
It was psychosis not depression very different also there's a lot of evidence that doesn't
add up even the skeptics.
You are not doing anything wrong about how you're approaching this I don't know what
the fuck chat is freaking out about yeah I'm just asking questions I literally don't
have a position on this.
says she did it in cold blood defenses saying insanity girly pop nation says
husband cover a foul play yep that's what I got no but I've seen more commentary
from the right on the issue I've seen more commentary on the from the right
being like you need to shoot her in the head right now which you know again
Barry, Barry, Barry, Barry, heinous crime overall.
I just grew some, I know the details.
Monty, Madder, Beth Stake.
Alan Smith opened fire at his family dinner, killing eight of them in Billings, Montana.
The youngest being seven, the oldest being great-grandma in her 90s.
The family say the likely motivation was because his parents told him he had to move out.
He was 44. Christopher Carol Kovitz in Michigan last month
executed his entire family of eight before setting the house on fire and killing himself.
Why because he had just lost his job and he was facing a possible divorce after cheating on his wife
And I never hear the man is fear talk about this
I never hear them calling for men to lose their right to vote because they're clearly emotionally dysregulated
They do commit over 90% of violent crimes
In fact family annihilation is so common it happens every five to seven days in this country
And the number one reason it happens loss of control specifically an impending divorce
Hmm. No talk about taking away their rights to vote, huh? Then we have Lindsay Clancy a woman under yeah
I don't understand like the broader analysis on this being like this is why women deserve less is so strange
That I don't understand
Like regardless of what your position is on this uh on this individual court case
To to make broad generalizations about taking away women's right to vote is fucking insane
It's insane. It just doesn't make any sense.
Are you an angel defending you and promoting your interview with Jewish currents?
I cannot with this insanity. I've said this before but in my opinion,
Son of Hun is the person of the public guy who speaks the most like a Jewish
atheist on issues related to Jews and anti-Semites. You can listen to my
conversation with him on the nose here. Well, near attended is never gonna do that.
Seems like you might be right about the establishment not supporting Angie Nixon.
So do you think I want to talk about that rumor thing because do you think
that that she is specifically trying to bait you into a some type of like I
I mean, she's being incredibly racist in her critique of you.
I mean, this is Laura Loomer, after all.
But do you think that is a way of distracting from the Senate race, A?
And B, I want to just extend that to, like, where is the Democratic Party outside of
the state, the National Democratic Party?
I mean, look, there's a million-plus of more Republicans registered in Florida.
i get that i can understand why there may be
we need to deploy resources somewhere
but some stuff doesn't cost money
and uh... you know elevating your campaign
uh... doesn't necessarily cost money
and the benefits of your organizing
is going to pay dividends one way or another
uh... in the future
well what's your sense of that
so yes i a is being used as a as a distraction uh... actually movie is
excited that the lower rumor debacle is taking front seat and being a part of the news cycle
right now because it's moving away from her theft of $10 million.
And when it comes to the Democratic Party, there have been some people that are a part
of the National Party that have spoken out. Should it be more absolutely, I would love
for them to continue to elevate me to let people know that I am in fact in its brace
to tell a few folks that throw some dollars my way.
We don't have to raise as much money nearly as Ashley Moody,
but we do need to raise money
to stay competitive and to win.
And so I am having conversations
with people making phone calls
and really using my organizing chops
to agitate people to do the right thing.
is Abdul on yet? Yeah, we got to show support to Angie chat. She's so awesome. She's so
dope.
Seeing very clearly playing out of the last several weeks, the vice president's visit
seemed at times more personal.
we don't deserve any
starting with this
that's a warm welcome from lsyad
so if you're starting a trade war with canada is because you're the asshole i
think michigan is going to remind jadie vance why he should send his ass back
to ohio
at the end of this day
now when vice president vance landed in the state in his comments he went
even further
i am asking you
is to remember
that the same guy
very, very, very evil.
Literal terrorism is maybe not going to have your best interest at heart when he gets to
Washington, D.C.
There's something about Abdul El Sayed that is very, very evil and on the rise in the
United States of America.
But whatever you want to talk about, Abdul, keep my wife's name the hell out of your
mouth because she's way out of your league.
And my lead source tonight is the Democratic nominee for Senate in Michigan, Abdul El
Sayed.
you, sir, for being here. First off, do you want to respond to what the vice president
said today, saying that there is something that is, quote, very, very evil about you?
Well, let me tell you what's evil. Evil is the idea of starting wars when there's peace.
Evil is the idea of stripping away people's health care when they absolutely have no other
option. What's evil is to do that so that you can pass a tax cut for billionaires.
What's evil is putting a data center that people don't want in their backyard
despite them. What's evil is corrupting yourself because you want a little bit more power.
At the end of the day, this whole conversation, frankly, it's a distraction.
The distraction from Michiganders are really worried about. The worried that they can't afford their
gas because of this trade war with Canada or because of this hot war with Iran that they got
us into. They're worried that they can't see a doctor because they're about to lose their
Medicaid. They're worried that their kid is being priced out of playing baseball.
So, if the vice president would like to actually get on to governing, he's welcome to do that.
But to come to Michigan, from Ohio where he's from, to tell us that we ought to pay for
a vanity trade war that his president is spiking with Canada, well, that's a little bit beyond
the pale.
And I think he can go take himself back to Ohio where apparently they like politics
like that.
You know, I mean, as he was saying that, he was talking about different races, different
religions.
you slightly. But he was referencing what you said after the attack on the synagogue in Michigan
back in March. At the time you condemned the attack that said violence is a cycle and quote,
hurt people, hurt people. You actually apologized for those comments over the weekend.
Why now six months after your initial remarks?
Because I've had the opportunity to listen to folks, to learn how it hit them. My goal
wasn't to cause anybody pain at all. I grew up in the community in which Temple Israel sits. I got
to go to Bar and Bat Mitzvahs at Temple Israel. I'm grateful for the opportunity I got to spend
with my Jewish sisters and brothers and as I've traveled this state, I've heard that that comment
caused a lot of pain and it was not my intention to cause any pain at all. But I'm big enough
to apologize when I make mistakes. I understand that there is not what people wanted to hear
at the time. You've got a president and vice president right now that just double down every
single time they get caught in an error for which all the rest of us have to pay. You
think about the trade war with Canada and I just want to focus on this for a second
because we're already paying what $3,200 a year for the president's trade war and then
he just escalated it. It's looking like it's going to cost us $5,600 because he
can't seem to figure out how to make peace with Canadians who by the way are some
one of those peace-loving people you'll ever meet.
And they're not willing to apologize, they just double down.
And I think that's the difference between leaders
and people who pretended to be leaders
in the name of their own power.
Your opponent, Mike Rogers, was asked about
the trade war that's underway
and whether or not he supports the tariffs
that the president plans to impose on Canada.
And this is what the Republican candidate in this race
had to say today about President Trump's plan.
Is this the right thing for Michigan?
Some of this is.
What's going on here is the Canadians want 500,000 more Canadian-built cars pushed into
Michigan.
My argument is that should be absolutely unacceptable.
The UAW is not for that, by the way.
And my argument is, don't we want the tariffs that at least give our auto workers an
opportunity to build cars right here in Michigan?
I argue the answer is yes.
Do you disagree that those cars should be built in Michigan?
Those cars should definitely be built in Michigan,
but this isn't how you do it.
What we understand about these tariffs
is that they are like all things Donald Trump does,
infested, chaotic, and self-serving.
This is about-
Can you talk about how it impacts
the auto industry in a negative manner?
This is about winning a vanity trade war with a guy
who seems to have personally insulted the president.
We'll talk about the UAW is for,
the UAW is for me in this race.
A.W. understands that this is not how you do tariff policy. I'm actually for thoughtful
well-constructed tariffs that actually achieve an outcome, but this is not that. This is
a president fighting a trade war with a neighbor asking us to pay for it, both in our jobs
and in our monthly paychecks.
We get all of our aluminum from Canada. If it's 50% more expensive, then that makes
the cars more costly. That means less jobs, less cars coming off the production
campaigns that almost anybody who's run for us senate in the past five million
dollars for his congressional campaigns alone this isn't somebody who's serious
about actually addressing public policy here's the thing he's caught between
knowing full well that these tariffs are bad for michiganers and having to
appeal to daddy trump every single time he opens his mouth and guess who's
gonna pick every single time he's going to be picked trump over you he
is fine with michiganers having to pay five thousand six hundred dollars
Because of Trump's vanity trade war making an argument that he knows has nothing to do with the facts of this case
But can I ask you would chastise him otherwise if you agree that those cars should be made in Michigan?
I mean, that's what also the commerce secretary
But
Yeah, all cars and all components go back and forth over the board well constructed tariffs
Let's just step back for a second. I actually believe that USMCA that the era of free trade was cancer
By the way, an era free trade that was advanced while Mike Rogers was in Canada and was in
Congress.
And at that point he was very pro free trade.
So it's interesting that he's now decided to find religion on this issue.
But the way you would do this is that you would invest in the future of auto manufacturing.
You would make those investments in a very clear way.
You would have clear transparent tariffs around meeting certain goals for how you
would then start to export, how you'd start to produce.
And as you met those goals, you would start to bring those tariffs down.
They would be targeted for particular goods, and in this case, you'd be targeting the
automotive industry.
This is 50% blanket across the board.
And let's be clear, anybody who understands the automotive supply chain understands that
parts go back and forth and back and forth, and they're picking up tariff costs every
single time.
This is going to be devastating for auto workers.
Auto workers are going to lose their jobs if this persists.
The Trump administration knows it.
The UAW knows it.
The Big Three know it.
And it seems like Mike Rogers is the last to figure it out.
You know, on the data center's argument that has become so much bigger of a political issue
than I think people even anticipated a few months ago, and for voters, when the president
says that we should let data reign and that communities that oppose data centers being
constructed in their communities will be backwards and poor, what is your response
to that?
He hasn't spent time in real communities.
I mean, this is a guy who's never cared about local communities.
Think about his time as a quote unquote developer in New York.
And then you think about his time in the White House.
He's more interested in the ballroom and the drapes than he is in the
well-being of local communities.
I'd invite him to come and talk to local community members who had a huge
data center forced down their throat in Selene.
They didn't want this.
And it's not because they're quote unquote backwards.
It's because they understand what the implications of this might be for
their water supply and electricity.
In the direction of the Republicans every day he speaks.
DTE is one of the biggest contributors to our political system.
They've spent on 93 percent of state legislators.
In fact, Mike Rogers has taken more single contributions from DTE
than any other corporation, and that really is saying something.
DTE is the reason why we lose our power for five days in a row
when you have like a mid-level storm where the wind barely blows.
Yeah, people fucking hate DTE emissions.
They've massively increased the amount of outflow that is required
because of this data center and telling us that somehow that's not going to affect either
our utility rates or our reliability, nobody believes it.
So when he says let data rain, what he's saying is, let me just finish this point, what he's
saying is he's more interested in doing favors for the corporations that buy his campaigns
than he is interested in the well-being of Michiganders.
Well, I mean, but on this, you know, you have said that you would like a state
and local moratorium on data centers until there can be robust federal guardrails
put in place. Some people might hear that and say, okay, but we watch how Congress works.
They're not exactly quick on these things, and it's a question of how long that could
take. Another question is, if you are elected to the Senate and Donald Trump is still president,
how do you get that passed anywhere? How do you get a pass of presidential veto, these
robust guardrails, given we very clearly see where President Trump stands on this?
Well, I'll tell you that most of Congress is starting to pay attention to the fact that
the public hates these things.
The 70-30 issue, you just showed that.
Mike Rogers himself, he's got up to $2.6 million invested in companies that would stand to benefit
from data centers.
He was asked a question in one of the few times he's ever exposed himself to an actual
journalist about data centers, and then the next day he issued his call for a
state-level moratorium, except he's running for U.S. Senate.
But it was his way of trying to capitulate on an issue he knows is unpopular.
Oppose plus try not to force working voters.
Every single time they go into their commuter.
Oppose plus 31 in Michigan anymore.
But if they do, they're hearing about it.
I'm sure they're getting a lot of mail and a lot of calls from their constituents.
So I hope that this moves Congress.
Now I'm going to have to work with Donald Trump, at least for the first two years
in the U.S. Senate.
But I also think that if he's hearing pressure from the broader public, it's
going to push pressure on actually getting the kind of legislation that protects the
public from the worst of these things.
Yeah, and we saw when Bernie Sanders put out a bill on this, I don't think he got a single
co-sponsor on a national data center moratorium, but we'll see what happens obviously there
and if you are elected.
You talked about Vance being in Michigan today focusing on the issues, what's important
to Michigan.
By the way?
This campaign between you and my quadratures has also been very personal.
i mean you're calling him
still are calling him beta repeatedly uh... today he was saying
that you picked in high school and that's how you're acting i was a little
i'm glad i think that his stuff is over well today for what you say about
that now
we should have asked someone you know about a couple of times good
this is good stuff that
spouses political spouses people are running for office should be off
limits
no god that's such a
terrible way to put that question i'd rather not talk about spouses at all
The truth of the matter is that Donald Trump,
almost as soon as I was nominated,
tweeted a picture of me and my wife
relative to him and his wife,
trying to highlight the fact that my wife wears a hijab
as if to make an argument that that's somehow less American.
And they have this interesting dynamic.
Donald Trump says one thing,
i.e. data centers,
or tweets a picture of my wife,
and then JD Vance pretends like it would be impossible
for anybody ever to do something like that.
So I'd like them to actually face down their own hypocrisy.
The point that I've been making about his wife
is that he believes in a political philosophy that says
that some people are somehow more American than others.
He, in a speech about a week ago,
said that he wanted to have a conversation about me
with his papa, a person that I understand
has long since passed, may he rest in peace.
But why would you invoke your long since past grandfather
to make an argument about me
If you're not trying to take us back to a time
when people like me were less than normal,
but then it raises the question
about who else might not be normal in that kind of an America?
Who else might not be included
in the broad spectrum of who can be an American?
I believe in an America where any of us, me, his wife,
any of us with different color skin
or who pray different ways
can be just as American as JD and his papar.
But he's not making that argument.
He likes to dog whistle about these things,
but when you actually call him out on it,
He acts like he would never bring anything like that into our political conversations
despite he and his boss doing that every single day.
Abdullah El-Sid, thank you for joining us on this.
Wow.
No, it's not questions.
Let's go.
Okay.
This is really good.
The United States is striking Iran for the first time.
This is really good.
Okay.
I was waiting for this.
We might be moving past the Hassan cycle.
It could be because it's Caitlyn and she's, you know, Hasan Neutral in general.
I hope I'm not jinxing this, but this I think might have been the first Abdul El Sayed media
hit that he has done so far, where wall-to-wall there were no questions about his affiliation
with me and that's it.
He was able to stay on message, stick to the issues.
Your 15 minutes are up buddy incredible. I love it personally. I'm a fan
Oh my god status news, let's fucking go
Status news has learned that Weiss praised the story the 9-11
Abdul story
Praise the network
Praise the story during the network's editorial meeting Weiss even personally directed the headline be tweaked to specifically mentioned
NL side had deleted tweets referencing September 11th terrorist attacks.
Same with Mamdani.
They are going to unleash a fucking new torrent of Islamophobia in the upcoming 11 days.
Okay?
And possibly after 9-11 as well, they're going to continue doing it.
25th anniversary. Okay. And I'm telling you right now, it is, they are already going hard
as fuck. It's 910 is the Kirk aversary 911 is the is the anniversary. The upcoming week
is going to be very bad, media wise. It's not going to be good at all.
But who are these Islamophobic people? They're targeting though, like they have it deep down
inside buddy I'm gonna be honest with you it's a lot of people okay like a lot a
good crazy amount of people there's a really really large number of people who
straight up you would be you'd be shocked like I'm talking people who are
otherwise very smart very kind individuals well-read who just turn on a
fucking dime you hear them say something about Muslims you know what the
fuck. It's like Trisphobia. There are certain edge bigotries that are totally permissible
in polite society. It's not dog whistles. No, no, no. What I'm talking about is not dog
whistles. What I'm talking about is the type of people who are otherwise like fairly progressive
people, otherwise fairly kind people, well read educated people who just say some of
the most heinous shit out of nowhere.
Brother, you jinxed yourself.
The new cycle will ratchet up in the next week.
I'm sorry.
I'm from the future.
My neighbor told me Muslims don't have souls.
Otherwise, a fairly normal person.
It was crazy.
Yeah.
And it's also bipartisan.
Liberals also demonstrate a lot of Islamophobic tendencies as well.
Bro, what is that collar?
This is known as a spear collar.
It's from the 1950s and I have a bunch of them and I'm going to be wearing them.
I really like this look.
My father, when I first mentioned Zoran way back when, literally he's a Muslim so that
scares me for women's rights and I had never heard anything like that from him
before broke my heart yeah it's it's crazy and you'll see you'll see it is
wild because you'll Islamophobia and transphobia are the two types of
bigotries that are also demonstrated by like other minority populations as
well like you'll have someone who's bro you need a different suit wait why
you'll hear like you're here from my other minority populations too like
people who are otherwise like very woke awesome issues yes I saw computer hot
make those hot Muslim and I don't like kids I know it's insane
That's just a song derangers syndrome is insane. What is this JD CA CEO Haley Sofer, who has
withheld an endorsement on Ilza shares a response to his apology over the weekend calling it
a good first step. This apology is a good first step, but building trust with trust
with Jewish voters will take additional work. He has never should have committed the
Jewish safety and security that goes beyond rhetoric explicitly denouncing anti-Semites
such as a Sompiker, and investing bridging ties with the Jewish community, which have
been significantly strained, sickening to hear the head of the Jewish Democratic Council
repeated defamatory lie concocted by centrist mere mongers and their maga brethren that debases
the very meaning of anti-Semitism.
Yeah, doing this to me, doing this to me is so nuts.
I think exercises like this make people more hysterical because the more you, the more you
dig at this idea that I'm this like dangerous, rabid anti-Semite, the more you're positioning
yourself against broad society, okay?
Because I'm not an anti-Semite, and it's not even something that is ambiguous.
I'm not, I'm not ambiguous about my, my opinions on this issue where I just like really focus
on Israel, but never talk about Jews or anything like that.
So that's why it's like extra crazy, because there are plenty of people who aren't anti-Semitic,
but rarely ever make a note about how dangerous this is for Jewish safety in general.
Not that they're anti-Semitic or anything, they just don't talk about that part.
They don't talk about that element.
I do fucking all the time and have all the time.
And there are thousands of hours of me doing this commentary, which is precisely the reason
why I'm one of the worst people to yell about on this issue.
You look like a crazy person amongst some of your closest allies too.
a really good way to identify someone being a little bit rabid about the issue of Israel or not.
You need a hat and trench coat?
Solidarity Muslims of this country along with of course Muslims who are big and so reformed
positive because I can't even imagine how shady it must feel we're there to be this
relentless races onslaught that not even good liberals are willing to defend you from it's
making me insane just an observer of it and I can't even fathom how it must feel to endorse
bullshit every single day especially when 99% of focus on all media and politics is the
hurt feelings of people who do not even treat Muslims as human beings just maddening
is so unjust. Have any Jewish Zionist fathers been forced to hire a Muslim liaison? No, interesting.
Yeah, this is, I'll be honest, it is getting, I wasn't here post 9-11. I was in Turkey,
so I can't speak on this, but it does feel like it's worse than after 9-11. Like the open contempt
an open bigotry being demonstrated by so many people like so many thinkers, so many liberals
is pretty fucking wild but I don't know.
I feel like it can't be as bad as like right after 9-11 for sure.
And like I said, I wasn't here, or I can't speak on it, or rather, when I was, when I
would come to the United States, I was, you know, a kid in camp and shit.
So it didn't, like, I had no way of gauging how bad it was, because in some respects,
the Muslim population in this country has obviously grown in the last 25 years.
So more and more people are familiar like they know people who are Muslim, right?
As opposed to like post 9-11, in the immediate aftermath of 9-11, most people had no idea
what the fuck a Muslim even was.
And they just saw them as like this force of terror.
So that probably caused a lot of Muslim Americans to like hide their identity to the best
of their ability, many of which who couldn't do that anyway.
And if you were just like brown enough, you were probably suspected of doing terrorism.
So
I remember kids getting pulled out of school for being Muslim.
Yeah, Barry Wise personally directed this morning CBS News headline about Abdul El Sayed
to be tweaked to specifically mention deleted tweets, referencing September 11 terrorist attacks.
Is that a vest or is it a one-piece fabric block shirt?
Yeah, it's a one-piece.
It's a French cuff.
Barry Wise and now CBS News are incredibly race and Islamophobic.
This is not for New Yorkers near city elected.
A Muslim Mayor 9-11 is my very first Mayor.
My dad saw the first plane hit the building.
We know people who died.
He and I are not offended by the statement at all.
In fact, we agree.
Before they left New York, my parents also lost people to COVID.
There were refrigerator trucks to store those who passed away.
My sister came and visited me and she would wash her clothes every time she went out,
even though I told her there was no need.
Both were incredibly traumatic experiences for New Yorkers in the U.S.
This is not empathetic on our behalf.
It's just Islamophobic and racist.
Yeah.
Anyway, that's all I got for today folks.
That's seven hours and 39 minutes.
We didn't even make it to eight hours.
Am I even invested in the game?
Or am I basically giving up?
That's the question on everybody's minds.
OK.
And I'll be back tomorrow, as always.
And yeah, I love you all.
Half day Hossie washed.
And I will see you tomorrow. Peace.
a song.
Stunlock to the stunlock to the top it's just begun.
Cause there is again a sun is streaming.
A sun is streaming.
There is again a sun is streaming.
The sun is streaming
Maybe when a Chinese train
Telling Kaya Place
Sun and asmen chatter, loves
Giving greening's grace
Zoram winning and YC
Walked two back with the force
The Rogan of the left to me, a dumb himbo, still on course
The Charlie Kirk assassination, the fear and online show
Eight full fucking years of this, plenty more to go
Doing fun stuff tomorrow, throw PBS up on the screen
A man made her reaction brought to you by this life's dream
Cause there he is again, the sun is streaming
A son is streaming, there he is again
A son is streaming, a son is streaming
Kacked out of the DNC, I rail and march the gold
Combatting the propaganda, the shutdown people's throats
CBS Israeli News, a coup, a regime false
A full-blown fascist takeover and still the duty calls
Total radicalization coming out to sea
The system where he'll always fail, it's up to you and me
All these daily streams, whether short or whether long
Have held millions of people keep it moving right along
Cause there he is again, a son is streaming, a son is streaming
There he is again, a son is streaming, a son is streaming
But hey, what can you say, that's BBS for you?
But he'll play games real soon, just you wait
Say hey, what can you say, that's BBS for you?
But he'll move on real soon, just you wait
Ba da da, ba da da, ba da da da da da da
Hey, what can you say?
Hey, that's PBS for you
We'll pull your lawns real soon
Just you wait
Sha-da-da, sha-da-da, sha-da-da-da-da-da-da
Hey, what can you say?
Hey, that's PBS for you
We're held to death ice real soon
Just you wait
Hey, what can you say?
That's BBS for you
Brought up by viewers like you
Just you wait